Col. Whitaker vs John Whitaker, Esq.

Well this means it's definitely not his cousin, John.

magnoliasouth Member Photo

Clipped by magnoliasouth

Col. Whitaker vs John Whitaker, Esq. - tt.. SvpcrviforU Office, ' July 1Q, 1 79 I...
tt.. SvpcrviforU Office, ' July 1Q, 1 79 I )R.Opf)3ALS will be received by JOHN WHITA- WHITA- KF.R, KCq;.-0f KCq;.-0f Halifax county; for the fnpplying the Retruit .of the Unittd tate.i,t Tarborongh, with provifiohs", nquVter-maimer, nquVter-maimer, nquVter-maimer, articles and medical wuiunce. The rations to be tufmnieu are 10 cumm f the following articles vii. ' " ; Oitepownd of Bread 'or Flour. One pound of Beef or j of a pound of por' -Half -Half a gi li of R 11 m,: Brandy or W liiflcy- liiflcy- - ""e quart ot Suit vo quarts' of Vinegar. "ne pomul ot .Candles. V per hundred rations. Two nonndt nf S;iH. CaiU win Jhc ndvanrrd a rhp nerfon who enters in- in- t( the tontraa, fining articles of agreement and a "wl, which mav fe feeu with Colonel Whitaker or WILLIAM POLK; Suparvifurtf. C,

Clipped from The North-Carolina Journal15 Aug 1796, MonPage 3

The North-Carolina Journal (Halifax, North Carolina)15 Aug 1796, MonPage 3
magnoliasouth Member Photo
  • Col. Whitaker vs John Whitaker, Esq. — Well this means it's definitely not his cousin, John.

    magnoliasouth – 07 May 2017

Want to comment on this Clipping? Sign up for a free account, or sign in