A.J. Marsh vs. Cincinnati Leaf Tobacco Co.

aprille Member Photo

Clipped by aprille

A.J. Marsh vs. Cincinnati Leaf Tobacco Co. - -aim-marrted . ' , , teapt.n-i Iwrnu.-crat...
-aim-marrted . ' , , teapt.n-i Iwrnu.-crat .out.-i .out.-i ' Oa- ' hul- i AMENDED Petition Filed By A. J. Marsh la Salt Agaiast Certaia Diretiart af the f lariaaati Leaf Tahaera War hsote (aoipair. A few days ago Judge Jackaoa sustalaed a demurrer to th patltloa iti tb ull of A. J aarsti, a a to- to- k bolder of taa Ctnctnaatl laaf Tobacco Warebvuae Coaapaay, to re-coiar re-coiar re-coiar from lertain of th I Ire-tor, Ire-tor, Ire-tor, er former lHrectora, lara uan of naay, alleged to hat been uaed out of the cavpitel f ih corporation. The action of th Court wa baaed ujeun lo fWllur of tb petitioa lo make all the lHrsctora panlaa and to make certain nj-y nj-y nj-y allegation Tester- Tester- dy an ainended'petltion was filed by Mr. "h' ' h" h h believe he haa. confurmed to th require. ments of the Court's decision lie sets out. a In the former petition, tba assertion that , 11 H. M .ffman. Ua H Brook and Henry Peltman were th Executive ommltua of th Hoard of Directors from I Met to lav. and owited about one third of tb stork of i the coinpari) It ia alleged that from lsV to ; .,... . tu. Ih. d,,wwd. m b(rh , d , , , ' ..,, u,. ,.., ; fh, ,..., of th. cumpju,y lo ,B. aaaouat uJ laut n.kins the ito.lt ia the lMrk,t . Boo4 r4t, th, gurtng hf fpom 1WM ,u IAa, Exeetlvs Cummt.llrt rouU j oupose of nwariy all their atock to adv.nt... It la allied hy rm.repr-ntat.on. rm.repr-ntat.on. rm.repr-ntat.on. a. lo the con- con- Kau.nl o( ltw ,ru. ronjuun of the com- com- i lan. .-t.ndttion .-t.ndttion .-t.ndttion ilw Directors werlodace4 , . !-..,... !-..,... !-..,... rmmi..a aii ..r, tKe h.a ir, ard It of Mfctor , n:, Bult against tb three aLfm mrnUoned to recover tb aaaoaM of b tb, t n(cn wrori0fuiiy i bM tb.y refused to do So. becaua tbe: the three men meatioried were wealthy ana T of Influen-e Influen-e Influen-e tn the tobacco market and ' might. If surd, injure th company Also tliat It was desired to reorganise tba com- com- I pauiy. and ir th men were sued tbey had the ' puwer to prevent tbe rvwgan laat ton. and ( would do ao. Also that th company waa la ' debt ln a large amount to Hoffman and I Feitman for rail lean and they row id aot bo conveniently repaid at that tarn. Tat amount du Hoffman rs about tlfiO.OVM and Feitman STo.wsj. it i aasertea that toe and r en man ,a.tsaj ii i aasertea tnat tat trirrrtor admit the truth ubetanilaily of . the allege tkjna made, but wanted a suit brought by a t oca holder. Marsa A Rltccd. attorney.

Clipped from
  1. The Cincinnati Enquirer,
  2. 19 Apr 1900, Thu,
  3. Page 5

aprille Member Photo
  • A.J. Marsh vs. Cincinnati Leaf Tobacco Co.

    aprille – 09 Apr 2013

Want to comment on this Clipping? Sign up for a free account, or sign in