The Independent from London, Greater London, England • 55

Running the show: Dorothy Arzner photographed on one of her film sets in the 1930s SUNDAY 13 JUNE 2021 Film Marriage is certainly not bliss in the of Dorothy Arzner, who made movies as challenging, subversive and genuinely radical as any modern says Pamela Hutchinson Marital drama: Fredric March and Sylvia Sidney in Dorothy We Go to Marriage has long been happy ending of choice. Some of the most interesting studio though, are those that question whether saying really betokens a lifetime of wedded bliss, or the risk of disappointment and divorce. One of the best of these movies, made when marriage was far more of an expectation than it is today, is Dorothy crisply titled Merrily We Go to Hell, from 1932. It was a box hit, and its depiction of wedlock as a trap still has razor-sharp jaws. Joan, a doe-eyed debutante (played by the delicate Sylvia Sidney) falls head over heels for Jerry, an alcoholic newspaper hack (Fredric March).

Jerry thinks Joan is and he tells her so all the time, but in truth his heart belongs to the bottle, and his glamorous ex-girlfriend Claire (Adrienne Allen), a blonde actress. The casting is rather inspired. Sydney and March had worked together before and have just enough awkward chemistry to foster hopes for their burgeoning romance. As the alcoholic Jerry, March exploits his own capacity to portray a split personality, which had recently been unleashed in his Oscar-winning lead performance in Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1931) but here, as in his other performances for director Arzner, he turns in something a little more nuanced, unsettlingly so. has this uncanny ability to be both appealing and putting at the same time.

He embodies the ambiguity that is central to the says Dr Judith Mayne, professor emerita at Ohio University, who has written extensively on Arzner. something very vulnerable about him when In 1937, play another notorious, tragic boozer, when he took the role of Norman Maine in the original A Star Is Born movie, opposite Janet Gaynor. She was an independent, queer woman, who lived as openly as Hollywood allowed with her partner, the choreographer Marion Morgan, for four decades we go to is used as a toast in the but also describes how Joan loses her independence, intoxicated by love and intermittent charm. Portents of disaster litter the path to their nuptials: Jerry keeps a picture of Claire on the wall of his apartment and is driven to the engagement party dead drunk, asleep in the backseat. No wonder he muses aloud to a pal, I a right to take a swell girl and make her a implying the life of a wife is best avoided.

The wedding scene is sombre rather than joyful, with hesitant vows punctuated by a painful moment of cringe comedy: Jerry has lost the ring, so he improvises with a corkscrew, which naturally he is never without. The service is by Reverend Neal Dodd, an actor who was also an ordained minister he hundreds of couples on-screen, and twice as many in real life. Arzner had plenty to say about the life of women in the she made, and this was her tenth. She was an independent, queer woman, who lived as openly as Hollywood allowed with her partner, the choreographer Marion Morgan, for four decades. Stealthy critiques of marriage, and expectations of women, run right through her from Katharine Hepburn declaring herself in Christopher Strong (1933), to Rosalind mental deterioration in Wife (1936).

When Jerry is wooing Joan, he sings to her about toothsome morsels: gingerbread, creme de menthe and cake. After they tie the knot, his drunken clumsiness spoils the dinner she has laboured over, and she is forced to serve their guests canned chicken. A bad marriage can leave a sour taste in the mouth. For Mayne, Merrily is most ambivalent about marriage, right up to its uncomfortable last scene, which makes a mockery of the idea of a happy ending. think sometimes people are very eager to make newer sound a lot more radical and forward-looking than they says Mayne.

always worth going back into Hollywood history to really going on in terms of what did, frankly what Dorothy Arzner did, in relationship to the current conventions of Hollywood Without giving away a spoiler, the ending is both romantic and deeply tragic. It leaves all the questions about whether marriage has anything to women, and future, worryingly unresolved. Sip the tea: Dorothy Arzner and Joan Crawford on the set of Bride Wore in 1937 the ending purports to be a conventional restatement of happily ever after, you get the sense that Arzner quite buy it, so neither do says critic Helen author of Women Vs Hollywood. And if traditional married life is not the answer to a young dreams, then neither is breaking the rules. When Joan senses she has lost she proposes an open marriage lives, twin beds, and triple bromides in the that is just as hollow as her loveless relationship.

Even if she does get to go on a date with a very young Cary Grant, looking very dapper at the very start of his career. still feels a little shocking to see an open marriage in a big Hollywood says mind in As points out in her book, the early 1930s were the perfect time to talk about such things, before the enforcement of the Production Code limited what we could see, and what women could do, on screen. It was just a few years before censorship would put an end to movies drenched in booze that condone adultery with Cary Grant. Never mind with in the title. really took advantage of the pre-Code era to come out pretty strongly against says Mayne.

Arzner was defying convention simply by turning up to the set. She was one of the few women working as a director in Golden Age Hollywood and the reviews of the were often distracted by that fact. One critic praised the for containing of rather than the of fudge and cucumber sandwiches hitherto has marked the of Miss Arzner, the lone woman megaphone wielder. Often her pictures were entertaining, but usually they were self-consciously true that Arzner took a tack to many of her male peers, which worked to her advantage. Her are particularly strong at telling stories, and she was known to be a respectful and collaborative director.

characters feel far more vivid than some of their contemporaries as a says She was ingenious too. When silent star Clara Bow had an attack of nerves shooting her talkie, Arzner whipped up an early boom mic, using a rod, so the actress could speak her lines without worrying where the microphone was. For the time it was made Merrily We Go to Hell features a particularly mobile camera, one that allows us to sway with wobbly gaze when tipsy on cognac, or tracks the couple through their bitter arguments. In an early long shot we see the besotted Joan dancing down the stairs as joyful, and as vulnerable, as a little girl. Arzner knew she was good at what she did.

Merrily We Go to Hell was the last she made at Paramount. She left rather than accept a pay cut, and took her chances as a freelancer. She continued directing until she retired in 1943 for reasons unknown. Many have speculated, though, that sexism, homophobia and the constraints of the Production Code made Hollywood an increasingly hostile place for a woman who craved independence not just for herself, but for her indelible heroines. We Go to is out on Criterion Collection Blu-ray on Monday Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here Please include your address A One hell of a director: the queer pioneer of Hollywood.