The Daily Herald from Arlington Heights, Illinois • Page 9

THE HERALD Monday, SapHmbar 29, 1975 Saction 2 suburban living LARGER RODS produce a smoortier movement and more tKickneii the hair. The imaller the rod, t(je tighter the cud. have come a bug way in past years. It's no longer a half-day, smelly process. Vince Lawrence of Men's Wodd of Barbering rolls up a customer.

The latest trend Men giving their hair color and curl treatment by KAREN THOMPSON The days when you peered into the cwner barber shop window to watch men having their ears lowered and their necks trimmed may be ending. Today, the mirrors are very likely to reflect styling combs, curlers and coloring bottles. Athletes are doing it. Cops the beat, bankers and hard hats are too, although most ot them tell. The questi(Hi of long hair or short is old hat as men opt for coloring, curl or body.

The basic wash and cut are now a matter of treatment and style. And each man has a different reason for choosHig a change in hair look. JOHN PFEIFER, proprietor of El Cid HairstySiig for Men iii Des Plaines, reports more and more men asking for body waving. enables a man to wear longer hair without style collapse and constant he said. gives thin or thinning hair more coverage and a more natural often suggest a body wave for men who are having trouble with their hair those who are spending an hour each morning blow brushing apd said Pfeifer.

look for an easier route. A body wave, available in various degrees, is often needed only for wave or a freer movement of the taches. in their twenties or thirties. Most of them wear a suit to work each day and they say just plain sick of the longer hair sticking out of their she said. now a cliche as hair consciousness is raised.

Other shops, however, report ages getting into the action. all Sales people at a maker of coloring products, figured that 48 per cent of the U.S. male population start to color their hair around 38 years of age, when the sideburns start to grey. a man and worried that some people might think I was a fag for doing it. But no one said anything in that vein.

After the first day, everyone just got used to he said. One newly-curled male gives his testimonial to easy care. a person on the go all the time, I have time to mess with my hair. After the perm, all I do is shower, towel my hair off and it dries while eating breakfast. Then a quick pick with a long-toothed comb or an Afro pick and set for the Body waving is a new alternative when long hair becomes unmanageable.

It adds texture to fine, lifeless hair and helps an oily condition. The perm lifts the hair off the scalp so it get greasy-looking as fast. MRS. RUFFULO said a lot of younger men are highlighting their hair at home on the sly with the spray-on bleaches. he continued, woman except my mother likes it and she is finally admitting that she will get used to AS FOR COLORING, when Archie Bunker dyes his hair on prime time television, you know a trend afoot.

Many men now can afford to spend money on their appearance. Perms cost about $25 and up depending on hair type and of curl desired. Coloring costs about $10 with additional services such as styling or cutting extra. No matter what men are doing to their hair, not likely to catch them sitting under a dryer with curlers in their hair. much more discreet than that.

INSTEAD OF deckling whetiier to color, or thicken left. thoHan or looqtlion hair, many hair care a whole new men are wondering whether to business. DOLORES RUFFULO of The Leather in Mount Prospect says that men who ask for the new looks the According to Vince Lawrence, owner of World of Barbering in Elk Grove Village, older gwitle- men come in for coloring. There is definite competition with younger men in our society, both socially and in business, and these men know Many men prefer the at-home treatment for reasons of both privacy and price. wife gives me permanents at honw that last for about two months and wily cost about reports one adventurous soul.

usually a bit queasy at first, but really fun to see tha change in their attitude and said Mrs. Ruffulo, take hair changes for granted, but for most men whole new concept and they are very are fairly typical. of them already have mus- The once popular phrase greying of the is What kind of reactions do they get? took some guts at said another male. consider myself In New York men are making appointments for the slicked-down styles a la Rudolph Valentino. Manicures, pedicures, bleach jobs, facials and even oi the elbows are part of the fare.

But not here yet. vA. V. Issue now before Supreme Court 'm Abortion focus on rights of parents, father m. by CHARLOTTE MOULTON WASHINGTON Nearly three years after its landmark abortion decision, the Suprone Court is being asked to deal with a backwash of legal issues centering on the rights of the pregnant, unwed parents and the prospective father.

These problems have spawned a growing number of state and federal lawsuits, and two frMn Massachusetts and Missouri will confront the justices when they begin their 1975-76 term in October. IN MASSACHUSETTS, where Dr. Kenneth C. Edelin is his manslaughter conviction for performing a legal abortiwi in Boston, the 1975 state law was attacked by a girl known only as A special three-judge federal court in Bost(xi found the law unconstitutional when applied to abortions in the first three months of pregnancy. The appeal reached the High Court in July.

At the time the suit was filed, was 16 and about eight months pregnant. The law required both consent before an unmarried daughter under 18 could obtain an abortion, although she could go to court if they withheld their consent. The girl did not want to inform her father, who had told her he would evict her and kiU her boyfriend if she ever became pregnant. aie was no longer seeing the boy, also 16. Dr.

Gerald Zupnick of New York performed an abortion after tiia federal panel ruled the law unconstitutional. JOINING MASSACHUSETTS in the appeal was Mrs. Jane Hunerwadel, mother of three daughters who represents parents of unmarried minor daughters. On the High docket last March is a challenge to complex 1974 abortion law brought by Planned Parenthood and two doctors. Pending appeal, the court blocked a decision by a three-judge federal panel in St.

Louis upholding the law in nearly every respect. The Supreme precedent shattering decision of Jan. 22, 1973, voided most state abwiion laws by forbidding any state to an abortion in the first six months of pregnancy but allowing state regulation of abortions after the first three months. The Missouri law prohibits saline induction abortions after the first three months and requires the written consent. If she is unmarried and under 18, she must have the consent of at least one parent as well as the fat regardless whether his whereabouts are known.

IN ADDITION, the law abolishes all parental rights if a live birth occurs and the child becomes abandoned ward of the state under the jurisdiction of the juvenile The Massachusetts case focused (m whether parents of an unmarried pregnant girl have any con- stftutional rights separate from hers. For instance, do they have a to and the Another issue is whether a minor can give intelligent consent to an abortion. Planned witnesses said most 16 and 17-year-olds are capable of doing so, while Massachusetts authorities insisted on 18 as the turning point. U.S. DISTRICT Judge Bailey Aldrich, who wrote the Boston opini(m, said an 18-year-old might be old enough to vote and buy liquor but had no when it comes to abortions.

Aldrich noted that in the rape of a minOT, Massachusetts law allows a 16-yearold to consent to intercourse but she consent to get rid of the product until she is two years In an acerbic thssent, Judge thony Julian said parents had been deprived of their legal rights because they knew nothing of either the abortion or tiie lawsuit. He said a guardian for should be appointed because the other parties had a financial interest in the case. One party to the suit is William Baird of Valley Stream, Long Island, a rights pioneer who figured prominently in a 1972 Supreme Court decision striking down another Massachusetts law forbidding distribution of contraceptives. The court reversed conviction partly on the ground the law treated married and unmarried women differently. (United Press International) I.