Skip to main content
The largest online newspaper archive

Oakland Tribune from Oakland, California • Page 3

Publication:
Oakland Tribunei
Location:
Oakland, California
Issue Date:
Page:
3
Extracted Article Text (OCR)

OAKXAKD DAILY EVEITIKG TITIBIJSrE, FRIDAT. JDIiX 1885. evening the wife of def endaut resumed her story: DEAD NATIONS THE last, you were suffering from an nicer of the rectum? prosecution to suppiy a walking into another mn y.rd with t-o CASE THE PRINDLE 1 Beer. The produet of the Washington Brewery is monthly becoming more popular; its sales are increasing throughout the city The Klnrtof iriafflcians. Bosoo, ths King of Magicisns, is showing his marvelous tricks of prestidigitation at ths Oakland Theatre.

So wonderful are his performances that they raise a suspicion of occult art pr aecro-mancy At the same time Eoeco i ves away a large number of presents which are divided by lot among the audience, thus adding a pleasing element of chance to the entertainment. A Fiery Experiment. There will be a public exhibition of ths Climax Antomator Hand Grenade in tbe public square, between Tenth and Eleventh, Alice and Harrison streets, on Saturday afternoon, at 4 r. M. An Insolvent Commission ITler- I-- chant.

John T. Cochran, a San Francisco commission merchant, has1 filed his petition in His, debts' are $18,922 and his Mr. Peter Bow v. Birr. Ontario, Canada, writes that he was cured of rheumatism by the use of ST.

JACOBS OIL, the great pain-core, i In memory of lT. s. Vrant. Memorial services in honor of the memory of the illustrious patriot, U. S.

Grant, will be held by the Israelites of this city at their place of worship to-morrow. Rev. M. S. Levy will deliver the oration.

A Heceaslty for Health. It is a prime necessity of health that tneaction of the bowels should be kept regular. But the way to overcome a temporary fit of constipation, or to remedy chronic costtvenej-a, is not to deluxe the stomach and drench the bowels with purgative of painful and violent action. The 4iappy medium between aa inoperative and violent ca-tharthic is Hostetter's Stomach Bitters, which acts just sufficiently upon the bowel to relax th in, without pain, andi which being a wholesome tonic, as well as aperient, has the effect of strengthening them and the stomach, and CASE. Attorney-General iriMrahall stnd an Ohio District Attorney in Court.

The Prindle case was i it sirup ted this morning for 'half an hour the appear ance in Court of Attorney-Ueneral Marshall, Mr. Clark, the District Attorney of Dark county, Ohio, and B.IF. Pritchard, former resident of Ohio, Who is wanted there on a charge of selling valueless patent rights, i A writ of efttradition had been, issued by the Govsrndr, and on that writ of habeas corpus 'wa sued out. Defendant's counsel asked for A continuance of three weeks, and was seconded by Mr. Marshall, who stated that Mr.

Pritchard was nnder bonds, and only asked for a continuance of tLree weeks in order to produce evidence from Ohio that he had already been trjjed in 1881 and proven that his was a cae of mistaken identity. The 'District i Attorney from Ohio and his associate claimed that Pritchard 5 never had been tried; that be had skipped from Ohio tfyice, and they had agents looking for hint in Michigan and other States, and only just learned ivhere Pritchard was. On I he other hand, the Attorney-General laimed tint Pritchard nevtjr had bee.i i fugitive from justice; that since 1881, when he was dragged to Ojiio, he hat been living penly, in constant comnv inication with business men (jhat he had also retnrned to Kentucky, the neighbo ring State to Ohio, and thre married one- of the' most beautify.1 Society ladic of the Blue Crass region. His marriagi was a society event, published at length i all the papers of Kentucky. jThe -Distrii Attorney pf Dark county mads a strong appeal to get possession of Mr.

Pritchan body. His Honor, Jurtge (liibson, saW he concurred with the Attorney General. The law was intended to persecute peopl unjustly. If defendant coul-jl make a lag il showing that this wis a case of mistaken identity or perhaps something worst, as hinted, it would be wrjang to dra this prisoner after fuur year, hick to Of swjjt from bis business. 'The District Attorney of Dirk county need not remain here.

The people of California were a lawahidiog people and the requirements of the law would be observed. He would grant a continuance and Septeir. ber 10th was finally agreed bpon. It is rumored that a fo rner whom Pritchard was divorced, is at the bottom of the proceedings and has been following her fate- liega i p. Under the laws of Ohio, the selling of patent rights which are void lis one of most serious Prison oiffense.

Whilst Pritchard claims that he has betn (tried once, and that bis accusers acknowledged he was not the man they jwanted, the Ohio authorities deny that he ever stbod trial. The case is altogether a mrfet curious, one, it beiog shown for defendant be has always lived openly in the) United States, whilst the Dark county authorities aver that he is a fugitive. Prijlchard's present business is that ef selling a mechanical contrivance, which takes him all over the States. Mr. Robinson, representing the State of Oh' in the Pritchard cast, appeared before Judge Gibson this aftet noon and asked that an order be issued calling on the de fendant to appear in Court Monday and shew cause Why ins bond of 1,000 should not Jbe increased to Mr.

Robinson stated that the Ohio people were appre hensive that Pf itch are wojjtd not he forth coming nen wanted. 1 ARE THEY SOLD Iii-vesligation of a Humor Railroad of For some days past there has been a good deal of talk about a prospective sale of the Sau Pablo avenue aad Telegraph avenue lines of street cars. WJ V. Camron, of this city, had ijieeo in treaty with ths coin pany for the purchase of the lines for some time back, but recently S. mery in-farmed him that the lines were no longer in the market.

He was! given to under stand that the! South I'apitic Coast Hal road Company had outbid him, and that a sale had beeu effected. Mr. Cam ron; when questioned tp-day, was not willing to state what priia the street-car company had placed on their lines, as hi considered that was their private business, Secretary Coring, ot tbe street icar com pany, was found at his office. Mr. Loring had taken his coat ibut hs was hot anyhow.

1 hel reporter asked "Is it true, as stated, Mir. Loring, that the narrow-giuge company has bought your street car, lines: Mr. Loringr looked up with a quick. nervom gesture, as if he would brush the reporter awayJ and answered: the sale 13 not made not made. If triie there are negotiations, but the sale is not yet made.

"Where is Mr. Emery? "He is in thie city." J. S. Emery, the President of the com pany, not being immediately accessible. the reporter was compelled to rest content with such' information as he had got, for Mr.

Loring had nothing more to sav it was learned from another source that Senator James G. Fair was here last Snnday and looked over the roads. Sen ator Fair is believed bejthe backbone of the narrow-gauge company. The price asked by Mt. is $44MUUO.

on which sum he states the road pays six per cent, per annum. It is rumored, iand the rumor is given for what it is worth, that Senator Fair offered within of the price asked. It is certain than i a man repre senting those who are negotiating for the sale is engaged to-day; in (taking an inven-torv of the stock and Dronirtv of tha road and the gang of men engaged in repairing the roads have been laid off. INJUNCTION DISSOLVED. j- The City Scores a Point in the Boulevard Case.

Ths demurrer and motion to dissolve the injunction in the suit of Carroll Cook and wife against the Oakland city authorities, came up for argument to-day, before Judge Greene! Henry "Vz-ooman aud City Attorney John, supported the demurrer. and Cook and: Cook maiatained the legal ity of their complaint. The general scope of the argument was that the amount of inconvenience stated by the complaint to be sustained by the plaintiffs by reason- of 'the building of the boule vard is not sufficient to justify an injunc tion, although; it might be a cause for dam ages. udge lireene sustained the demur rer and ordered ths action This order aissolvee the injunction, but an ap- i i i i peai wiu proDaoiy oe lanen.o PERSONAL MENTION. ii City Clerk Fisher has returned from his Kern county ranch.

Hon. P. Aji Roach, Public Administra tor of San was in Oakland to day. I -Gi VV. Edwards and wife arrived from Auburn this Week and are stopping at the Centennial House.

-Mrs. Rosie Steiner and Mrs. Frederick Ochsner, of Sacramento, are visiting Mrs. bchuler in this city. OAKLAND BREVITIES.

Yesterday laborer at work at tha coal bunkers bn Long Wharf had his knee cap fractured by a. lump ot coal, wnicn slid down a chute. i The Oakland Observatory will be again thrown open! to the publio next week. fersons desiring to secure evenings at tbe Observatory must first register their names with the superintendent of Public In struction and an evening will be allotted them. Pictures for Him.

This morning's Jiecrnrd- Union baa this about Henry Vrooman: Yesterday a newsboy approached Senator Vrooman at the depot and tried to sell him a paper. "Oh," said the Senator, "I don't read a newspaper; I'm a Democrat, and can't read." "Got; just what yer want!" replied tbe astute youngster, fishing out of bis pile of literature an ancient copy of the Examiner. 1 Here's at Democratic paper. full er nice pictsra." The Senator aorren- dcred. xaie complains that Harvard baa a coach.

Perhaps if the Yale boys should take a horse car they could catch upwiuiumro, THE PRITCHARD Alluding to Dr. Buck's visit to her in the second week in January', Mrs. Prin dle said: I told my husband! Dr. Buck al ways aaid he would, and made me, and there was nothing said this 'time. the witness broke down.) It is too awful to tell, an i I cn't do it; I don't know how-to say it: I told him that morning I would tell him all I had to; 1 was going to tell him about the miscarriage, and he told me 1 1 tell htm about it this tiin, and he said, where was the last time I told my husband that Dr.

Buck always wanted to pet me first, and always did, but after making an application he went with me without saying a word; my husband says: 31y Uod! 'lhe damned viiiian, 1 will kill him and you, too; that wretch," he says. "to come to you that will take lug lite, will do it; do you mean what you say. mamma? Have you told Lr. wytneT I said I had; Dr. Buck cams in to see a sick boy in the house, and then came to see me; he put his hand on my breast and kissed it, and said he would have to see me occasionally as long as I my husband said; Wasthis after Dr.

WVthecame?" I said it was I asked him: Papa, did you know Dr. Buck caused me to have that first miscarriage in Alameda? He answered: "Was thit before you went with him? I said yes; he said: God will have his life and yours, too;" ht took out his; knife, and I said: Give it to me; he said: "Yes, I will give it you and him, too" then I shut myself in the c-hiset, because, I had the key oh the inside; I locked it, and he went but; I have never seen him since; the next I heard was of the shooting from reporter; I can't r-jineiiiber or act out what I did those times; he would follow me round and alt down or lay down and go out in the hall; I asked him; why he did not kill uie: he said he had a good mi ad to at times, qiitie couldn't it; he loved me to distraction; at the time 1 was telling my hushand tlrBsa transactions, I was living at Mrs. in East husband was overseer of the Fuse Works, at Melrose. i In answer to counsel, witness stated: I went to the Roberts House to live about three years ao. i Mr.

Fox askect.how she to go there. Counsel for the people objected. Mr. Fox stated he proposed to show that Dr. Buck engaged tha- rooms and took her there so as to ive her nearer to bis office, and that Mr.

Prindle did not know she had gone there, but had to, find out from Dr. Buck whera his wife was. There was no claim tht ths defendant objected to this. Tha object was to show the familiarity between the family and Dr. Buck.

Objection overruled. Witness answered in suhxtanct that Dr. Buck asked her in his ottrce if -r husband wen with her the night previous. Witness said "Yes." Dr. Buck replied: "He shall not do it aiiy more.

I have a greatmind to take you to the hotel myself." Dr. Buck then tocjk witness over to Mrs. Roberts' and engaged a nice sunny room for her. Mc Moore, for the prosecution, objected to the admission of this evidence as being vicious and irrelevant. i Mr.

Fox claimed the question and answer was proper, as the changa was made undar the professional advice of Dr. Buck, and that, tbe husband assented. He did not propose to show that the change was made for the purpose of cohabitation, The prosecution asked that part of the answer to be stricken out, as not responsive to the question. The Court thought that ths main issue was the mental condition of 'the defendant at the time of the killing. The objection was withdrawn, and the answer allowed to stand.

The witness continued, It was four hours' after I went thore, aod the same before my husbaud knew I was there. We were there seven or eight mohths, or nine months, perhaps. At a subsequent time Dr. Buck secured other rooms, for this was at Dr. Martin's, on Thirteenth street.

My husband also knew of that time. We lived there five or six months. CROSS-EXAMINATION. This closed the direct examination, and Mr. Moore entereiTuppn the cross-examination.

The. witness stated that she was at present living at Thirteenth and Broadway, at her niece's house. She had lived there fcinca last Friday. Prior t- that time, and cince the night Of the killing, she had been residiag -with Mr. Merritt's family at Melrose.

Since a few days after the homicide the witness stated that nhe had not been in communication with her husband, but had been under instructions from the prisoner's counsel not to, sea anybody unless on an order from them. The witness stated she would be 40 years old in August, and was born in Springfield, Massachusetts. The attorney then questioned the witness minutely as to her movements after taking up; her residence in this State, where she had resided, and whether she kept house or not. The witness, ia response to a question, stated that when she came here land for a long time afterwards her health had been good. HER TWO CHILDREN.

Her two first children were named Nora and Frankie. While in East Oakland Dr. Pinkerton bai attended her on one or two occasions. She statsd that she lived in one house in East Oakland Until Dr. Buck took her away.

This was stricken out on motion of Mr. Moore as not being respon sive to his question. The first houseshe lived in in Oakland she said was situated on Twelfth avenue. She did not know the number or who owned the property; her husband paid the rent. After moving from the bouse on I welfth avenue, iu Oakland, tne witnesi stated that she went to the Jioberts iiouie on Washington street, remaining there eight or nine months.

Oo the day she went to the House the witness stated that she did not know she was going to move. She just came into Oakland, and after taking the rooms staid there. She did not go back to the East Oakland House. i After leaving the Roberts House: about three years ago, the witness stated that she went East on a At that time she was in poor health. She was gone about six weeks.

On hr return she went te live at a Mrs. Larue's, on Thirteenth avenus, in East Oakland, and remained there about six months. She then changed her residence several times, still remaining in East Oakland. On leaving East Oakland she and her husband removed to this city, taking up their residence at Dr. Mar- tin ou i thirteenth street, and remained there until last October; then moved back to East Oakland, and the latter part of October went to live at Mrs.

Harden- berc's, whirs she remained up to the time of the tragedy. Dr. the witness stated, continued to treat hers np to last January, nhe could not say she had a physician all the time. She sent for one when she was sick. Here tha Court adjourned- Swedish Manners.

London Society. One great peculiarity of traveling in Sweden is the extreme quiet and lack of flurry. The Swedish are a taciturn and noiseless people. They do much by signs, ana never shout; a Swedish crowd makes singularly little sound, bwedes, even of the lowest class, never push nor jostle, it is tbe custom to do so much bowing and hat-liftim? that oner is obliged 'to move more, slowly than, in England to give time for all this cour tesy. When a train leaves a platform or a steamboat a pier, all the lookertf-on lift their hats to the departing passen gers aad bow to them; a compliment returned by the travelers.

If you address the poorest person in the streets you must lift your hat. A gentleman passing a lady on tbe stairs of a hotel must do the same. To enter a shop or a bank with one's bat on is terrible breach of good -manners; If yon enter or leave a coffee room you must bow to all the occupants. Passengers on board the little steamers which ply about Stockholm invariably raise their hats to the occupants of any other boat which passes near them. The very men in charge of the locks on the canal bow politely to the sailors aa the boats go through.

Imagine runglish bargi indulging in such I First Lady "Why do; yon keep that amaU boy about here? Second Lady "Why, bes my irst Lady "Well, he's very pert, Yon ought to set your hoaband to torn down that page occasionally, so that he can keep jus puce," I a a loMea revolvers, auu iuwhi u.u. The Court said that ne evidence should be offered for one and used for another. i Mr. Moore did net believe that eitner side had dons any such thing. -He did not believe that any questions had been offered to display vocal gymnastics or for any other outside purpose, and he wonld say it for the last time and woul 1 never say It again, that he protested that the prosecution had never done anything of tbe kind.

Mr. Fox discussed the elementary ques tion -of motive and malice -in criminal cases. 1 tie question at issue ana tuose put to the witness were to show malice. He maintained that the showing of malice could only be shown in rebuttal, and that the counsel had no right to attempt to by the witness, under the guise of cross- examination. Mr.

Fox added that in fine he objected that this was not cross examination; was irrelevant and immaterial. The Court acknowledged itself in doubt. and said it would take the matter under advisement. They could proceed in the meanwhile. Witness continued: Dr.

Wythe became my physician after Dr. Buck ceased to be; a i i i l.1 UlintC It was auoui hub oi rouiuuy when Dr. Wythe first visited me; I could not say. Counsel asked: Uid no Jir. ytne visit you on the Jo'h of January Mr.

Fox obj-cted that thw was omv another' form of the same question nw under al yisemt i.t. Mr. M.joie was willing to let it go with (he other question. He argued at length, and The Tribune has publistied so much the ar-'ument now going on that it is only necessary to state generally tint the defense are fighting vigorously against the introduction 'of tetinviuy showing that Dr. Buck called in other physicians, such as Dr.

Brown andl)r. Wythe voluntarily, and finally turned over his case to them, and that the rtefendant must have known, in crediting or discrediting his wife's "story, whether the actions of Dr. Buck were such as to make it possible for him to have acted as she said she did. Cognate to this was the question of the bill, and the fast of the bill being presented, and the action of Buck in turning over his patient to other physicians, and bringing them to consult with him, should bet admitted as a set of circumstances to contradict the set of cir cumstances narrated by his wife, and to show that any frenzy of mind, claimed as grounds ton irresponsibility, snouid not have existed- Mr. Moore finally withdrew the question, and stid Mrs Prindle had already admitted that Dr.

Wythe had been called in, and it was eminently proper and simple cross-examination to ask if he was not called in in January. He, would put the question in that wav. Mr. Fox again objected. The question was re-read, and the Court thought it a preliminary question.

After further discussion the Court sustained the objection. "Mr. Moore- asked if the taling of the Court extended so far, in that direction that they were precluded from asking when she changed her physicians, and at whose suggestion. Might it not show that if it was at Dr. Buck's suggestion, it would tend to prove that it should hive favorably affected defendant's mind? The Court thought it might, but considered such testimony scarcely legitimate, Witness continued she thought the first statement made to her husband was on Kaster Sunday, the 5th of April.

On being asked whether sin had no. told her husband, he replied, I don't know how that could be if I did not begin until the 5th of April." Counsel next asked if Dr. Wythe had not said to in the presence of her husband on the 2d of that-, he did not beHeva the story, that it was incredible, and that he did not believe that she was, so wicked, and that she, in response, laughed and said: "It's so." Counsel for defense objected. (The Prosecuting Aattorney said she had admitted talking to Dr. Whyte and her husband, and that this was perfectly legitimate cross-examination.

The Court said if that was not a conversation he did not Know what was. Mr. Hall said he would ask the question iu another form. THE WITNESS WEErsC Mr. Moore: you the 2d day of April, at the house of Geaeral Hardenberg, and in the presence of Dr, Wythe, make statements to your husband eoncerning your connections with Dr.

Buck?" I 1 don't see how that could be when I did not tell him anv thing to until the 5th. uiu you ever matte any ui-cioaures so your husband- in the presence of Dr. Wythe? The witness here became overcome, and began crying. Finally witness srid: "Dr. Wythe spoke to me about it in my husband's presence." Mr.

Moere insisted on an answer to his question. lhe witness Raid she thought she did, but she did net think she laughed. She said she didn't think she would fsel like laughing. At the time the disclosures were made to her husband, in Dr. Wythe's presence, they were at Mrs.

Hardenberg's. I stated to my husband that once after Dr. Buck ceased attending me he visited me at Mrs. Hardenberg's. I also told mv husband that on that occasion Dr.

Buck said he came to vis a sick boy in the house; the sick boy was a son of Ms. Hardenberg's; witness could not tell the date of the visit; she did not think she told her husband the date of the visit in question. A TEN MINUTES' BEST. The Court took a recess at 3:15 o'clock fur ten minutes. It was ten minutes to four o'clock before Court; reconvened and Mr.

Moore continued his examination of Mrs. Prindle. He further questioned her concerning' the visit of Dr. Buck after the latter had ceased attending her, with a view of discovering tlie date of the visit. The witness could not remember.

Mr. Moore then asked if after tbe witness had made her disclosures to her husband if she and her husband did not call at Dr. Buck's house and leave word for Dr. Buck to call. Mr.

Moore stated that he would follow it up by showing that about ths 4th of April Dr. Buck did call at Mrs. Harden berg's and saw Mrs. i Prindle; that her husband was in an adjoining room and within full hearing of all that transpired; that tbe interview was about a bill for services, and that nothing' about seduction was at that time referred to. Mr.

Fox insisted on his objection on the grounds that testimony regarding the bills bad been ruled out. He also claimed that the interview was not in the hearing of the husband who, he was in another room. The Court thought that if Dr. Buck's visit was at the instance of the defendant, it might be proper to admit it. Mr.

Fox asserted that there was noth ing in the question to show whether Dr, Buck visit was in response to the call left by Mrs. Prindle and the defendant to visit the bouse. Mr. Moore withdrew the question, and announced that the cross-examination was ended. BE-DIRECT.

Mr, Fox then began the re-direct exam ination by asking tbe witness if she under stood what was meant by the question re garding her going down to Mr. Merrifts. She said she did not think it meant you (referring to Mr. Fox) I had seen yon at Mr. Merritt's.

and at Mrs. Prindle's. In regard to the visit East, the witness stated that it was a Tear ago last October, and not October last, as she stated. Mr. Fox then asked at whose suggestion the trip was made.

The Stats objected and more argument on the admissibility Mr. Fox stated that he would show that the visit was made at ths instance of Dr. Buck and that Prindle borrowed the money for her to take that trip. Mr. Moore withdrew tha objection and the witness stated that it was at the suggestion of Pr.

Bock that tha trip was made: ha told my husband to send me East for my health. Counsel eoncsded thai bis next question was not direct re -examination, but asked leave to ask it as being Blatter in chief. There will be no session of tha case to morrow. ester ra After Tax Teisvsx went to press last I a Th miMti.in was obiectad to on the eround that itlwas not cross-examination. thk obLi of the question.

Mr. Moore stated that the object of the question was to shew the frenzy of the defendant on the day of, the or whetler there was any frenzy at all. They pr posed to show by the witness that in last Dr. Buck and Dr. Brown performed an operation Uipon her; tint her husband was cognizant of the operation ling performed, end of the nature, of it; that he kndw that it was of such aehar-acter that ci ition was impossible; that knowin? that coition -was impossible the husband could not have been wrought up te such a state of frenzy as ciaimed by the defense, and hat lie had not, from his knowledge of I lis wife's condition, any reason to believe stories of his wife.

s. Con-iderabli discussion ensued pro and con, and Mr. Vloore finally withdrew tl.e question, substituting oue similajr, but differently framed. After argument, the. question was withdrawn, and Mr.

Moore put the question in antithe 1 form. Q. Do you know Dr. Brown, of Oik-liknd A. I seen him, but was "jnever introduc id to him, and never spoke to hini.

The questi i was objected to and withdrawn. Mr. Moore asked next: Who if any other physicia is had ever beeu called in to assist? His ol ject was to show whether the defendant tiad any right to get into a state of frenzy or to- believe his wife's story. Ci mis 'I th-iUrfht they had a right to show tbat other physician were called in becaise it would be unuatural to suppose that ue physician would call in another to examine the body of the victim of his own lu Mr. Fox have not all got as active minds as you.

Brother Moore. Mr. Moore- -Most people have. Counsel cm tinned: No ordinary man guilty of such debauchery would call in another man examine the woman he had debauched. He amendec the question so as to ask whether, in lSS4, Dr.

Brown was not called in by Dr. Buck at General Hardenbergh': home, and, with Dr. Buck, performed an peration on an ulcer in the rectum in thepresence of the husband. Mr. Fox sairi that the further they got into the quest on the more immaterial and irrelevant the; became.

a It was now ionn, and the question of fixing the dat as to Mrs. Prindle's statement regarding her last connections with the deceased was agreed to be taken up after recta. At tern sou Proceedings. On the re: asembling of the Court the question last put to the witness by Mr. Moore: Wha I meant ask you is whether or rot in December, 1SS4, J)r.

Brown was called and if he did not act in consultation with Dr. Buck upon yaur case in Dr. ick's office, and is it not a fact that attliat time an operation was performed by Dr." Buck and Dr. Brown, for an ulcerat rectum, in your husbandV presence? wa; read. The objection raised by the prison r's counsel to the question which was ur de discussion when recess was taken, vss disposed of by Mr.

Moore withdrawing he (question. COKRECTION. Moore then asked the witness if she desired to make any correction iu her testimony given this morning, in regard to the date she last made any disclosures to husband She replied, my husband was talking about' memorial ana that he was geincr up to the memorial services that evening; that is the only reason why I remember the last day I spoke, to him; it was (about nine o'ci jk in the morning wheij I spoke to him; he didn't go out immeqiately, but went out iome time between I) and 1 o'clock. In answer to further the witness stated that the conversation on'y lasted a few moments and then he went out; when he returned I noticed a change in his appearance, iu the manner of wearing his bsard; I don't think he bad his beard shaved off; I cannot Bar whether he just had it trimmed or sot; we ate dinner that day about 3 o'clock; my husband ate at the same table with me; he came home about 1 o'clock, abost two hours before dinner; I think between 9 and ten o'clock be went out twice and came back. Mr.

Moore next questioned the witness concerning the statement she made to her husband that I she told her husband that the last titue that she had with DcJctor Buck was in The second week in January. The witness answered thai she so told her husband, and then Mr. ploore asked the if any other physicians beside Dr. Buck had attended her luring the December preceding the January 1 in question. Mr.

Fexected, and the Court sustained the fcbi-ection. THBf LAST COSFK.SSION. The witness stated that the last -time she made any disclosures was, she thought, shortly before one o'clock on the day of the shooting. I I only talked to my husband once tsat day about my relations with Dr. Buck; I saw him after he was shaven, but II cannot say whether .1 made any more diB closures to him at that time or not.

Shs could ot remember whether-it was in the morning or not that- her husband mace the remark about attending memorial sei vices. Nobody was present when he mads the remark about memorial services. iSli could not remember when it occurred other than at Mrs. Hardenberg's houxe. Mr.

Moore Since the adjournment of Cijurt whom save you talked to regarding your former 1 estimony My nie ce. LB BUCK'S BILL. Mr. Moon i then asked Dur'n? the time that Dr, Buck attended you what did yonr busbar know what Dr. Buck's charges were for medical attendance Mr.

Fox ot jected on the grounds that the question waf irrelevant, immsXerial, and incompetent, and not cross-examination. Mr. Mojre argued that this was legitimate cross-examination. The -relations between Dr. Buck and the Prindle family were so intimate that the Doctor was allowed to change her habitat without con sulting her hisband.

These relations were not those of ordinary friendship, but of the most sa 'red character. They would show that on one occasion, when Dr. Buck presented a I bill for services rendered, Mrs. Prinilal went to see, him, and told the doctor that he charge so This, Mr. ould tend to show something ought not tc Moors said, of the action of the defendant's mind, and -pas furthf ore '-permissible to show the relations of I the dead Doctor and the woman.

It wae singular. Mr. Moore thought, that if the relations were such as claimed betv een Dr. Buck and the woman. it was singular -that the physician should charge regulhr fees, and good round ones, too.

Mr. Fox llenied that the prosecution could 'take the defendant's witnesses in order to she motive and to crjos-examine them on poists whjch had not come out on direct examination. TKK COUBT'a BULING. The Court! thought it strange that there should be any objection. If the evidence was to show tin otive it would be inadmissible; but it was urged that it Was offered to Show ths degree of intimacy between the parties.

If) a man were deceived, by a friend, it was dUterent to Deing aeceived by a stranger. The looked on the relations between pnysician ana patient as one of lh4 most confidential in nature, similar to that between attorney and client. If Dr. Buck! bad given his services tree it mieht have tendered to prove his friend ship to either Mr. or Mrs.

Prindle. If he had charged the ordinary tees it would not disprove hist friendship. The Court supposed that Mr. Moore's views were that if Dr. Bock hsd charged his ordinary fees, it would tend to saow that tnis alleged inti macy had not existed.

His Honor thought it very difficult to sometimes find tbe cone of legitimate evidence. Mr. Moore thought the jury would like to bear and be instructed as to whether ths relations of ths deceased who was allowed to change ths habitat of tba defendant at will were those nf friandshin or not: whether be was act ing for friendship or ccin. Mr. Moors insisted that the question of ths bill entered lanralT into! the Question, aod that ths tes timony ought to be admitted.

Mr. Moors went rurtner, ana saia use ne uiougni thai tha qneetion of motivo should not bt discussed. It was not necessary fee tha it i and county i Dy reason of the superior strength and quality of its brew. Subscription Taken for All kinds of natter aod delivered or mailed to any pirt of city: a complete line latest standard works on hand. Pooket-cUitlons exchanged, i T4 R.

BURNS' Newi Dtpots, corner seventh and Broadway, and Ninth and Broad-way. I i New To-day. SPRING FEUEH At this Beaaon STt.2Si.T!. rTL -T 'K into almost OTwy ph uoian'a preacnptioa for thoaswbo dm! boildtn np. BR0VWS.

21 THE BE5T.T0H1C. For Weekneso, Xaaeftude. Leek ef t-nergy. it HAS ISO EQUAL, and the only Iron medicine that is not in) a lien. It Enriches the Blood, Invitrornte tbe Nyaten, It encores ids Iia-esrioa It does not blacken or injure the teeth, cause bead- ache or produce constipation otjitr Iron autiicuM ia Dr.

O. Bpnrr. a leadine Dhracjaa ot hpnmrfield. 04 wiya: "Brown's from Bitter" i a thomcfhlj ytxid medi. Cine.

I n. it. in mv TTmi an4 finil it 1 wu. exoeta all other forms of iron. In weakness or a low conuii oi tne system.

Brown's Iron Bitters is DsuallT a pontiTS necessity. It is sll thai Mtoiumed tor it. i Gennine has trade mark and crossed red Unas on wrapper. Take no ether. Made only by BHOWX llHEHirALrOn BALTIMORE.

BID. I Hakd Book asefol and attrartr-s. con-tainrac list prizes fiw r-cipes. informstion aboot coins, siren sway by ajl dealers in medidBSi. or vi iwiyt ia an.

mnsp w-v at dv il 'Park, Oakliinil. i A Deantitul norce. on a northwest corner on the best fen avenue in the Park. Is elevated ver 100 feet above tbe sea level, and. overlooks Oakland and the bay, audi fiir- view, health and neigh borhood canx be surpaMed.

The house la a hiuh cottage of 7 rooms and bath; papered throughout," laree moms snd high ceiljpfri The' lot is 140x200, orns- mented with lawns, rockeries. shrubs, flowers, fruit and shade trees. Tbe prop. erty must be sold, and is offered for $2,009 less than If you are well and hearty buy this and keep pq; and if troubled with asthma any lung complaint, buy aod get well, Uiiu early on E.WlW00DWARDBC0. 4G Eighth Street, Oakland, As the place must be sold at PLACER COCXTT, CAL.

THIS WE1T. KXOWS AKD POPTJLAB resort, situated in a beautiful valley upon the bead waters of the Anwlcat river, haa been refurnished throughout and will be opened for guests on aud after May 1885. Magnificent mountain snenery, excellent 6 ski uk and hunting; the liberal pal mnage heretofore extended by the- resident of Oakland is solicited for tbe present management; take C. P. R.

K. to 8oda Springs staMon; refer by permission to W. MlLLtli, W-i. lllSArOA.Oatlana A.aoress iWILL B. VIXETAKI, i Proprietor.

Soda Springs tDonner P. Plaaer County, 6al LOWPEICES, Is Fl 1 Heed Cos G1 Broadwayj FOR SALE One Nek Cooling Roctaway Very Fine. Finest Fair of Carriage Horses iln Alameda County. One Iair Truck Horses 2850 All to be seen at Dexter 12th i and Himson. The Eeliablb CITY! LOAN OFFIGE 1163 BROADWAY, JCewr Foartnth Street.

W. IT. HOURIET, Watclimaker Jewelc: Keeps a large Stock of "Watches, Clocks aod Jewelry. Special attention paid to Repair! tbe above. WORK SOLICITED and WARftAJOT: 1616 Tenth and Eleventh ii 4l Ear, CatarTi, Tnxoat and Luag Soecial Office aod BesideBee, 3St Orrr Saa Franc Honra.

lOteii. WHTED-i WOJIi TO SEVr by the day. ho can (lva reference; ai room 17, Oaiindo HuMi. between Uaa and i r. M.

H. WSSTERWASW. BF! firewery, com Filih ana i i r-rr ni I Jill! I I Kmrnii 1 Hidilai So i Mm Hotel, i I Lss i Eastern Preparations for the i I Grant Obsequies. Ths Flans of the President and tha Cabinet The Names this Pall Bearers. SPECIAL THE TRIBUNE Nkw Yobk, July 31.

Arrangements for Gen. Grant' so far as they re- late to completed. Hancock's are nearly A. Gsddings, of Washing. ton, wrote suggesting that a detail of 100 men from I each regiment that be present in served nnderf Grant procession.

The Sergeant-at-arms of the Senate, W. P. Cenpdy, tele-be Vice-President and a graphed committee from the Senate ould attend the obscquief, Colonel G. S.i Gillespe, U. S.

AM General George B. M. Havarty and Brevet Brigadier-General T. F. Rod.

of Bath, were appointed additional aids.j Colonel Roger Jones has been telegraphed to fire minute guns at Saratoga during the progress of the funeral train. Mt. McGregor, July 30th. Mrs. Grant, who has remained in the upper rooms of the pottage since the General's death, last evening descended to the parlor, where she viewed the remains of her husband after theyj had been composed in tba casket.

To-day she is as usual. Hera mind is distressed, but she is physically well. I THE FUNERAL CAR. i The funeral which is to receive Gen. Grant's byly upon its arrival at the Grand Central Station to conduct it to the City Hall and subsequently to the place of burial, is being! It will be a platform car, the wheels being entirely concealed by a drapery of heavy black fringe- and tassels.

This platform- carl will receive the casket. The catafalque will be draped with black broadcloth. i trimmed probably be with heavy fringe, and will three feet hfch. over the casket Above the catafalque and there, will be a black can opy, supported by four dark mahogany posts, elaborately carved and- carefully finished, i The cloth, paneled canopy will be of broad- with satin and lined with silk, and the whole' structure to be twenty feet high and the most imposing thing of seen in this country. It will be drawn By thirty black horses, each led by a colored groom.

ROUTE OF THE FUKEBAt. the funeral, as 'now fixed. The route ef will be from the City Hall up Broadway to Fourteenth street, through Fourteenth street to Fifth ia venue, up Fifth avenue to Fifty-seventh street, thence to! the Boule- vard, up thaq thoroughfare to Seventy second street, thiough Seventy-second street to the Riverside drive, up which the procession will; pass to the site of the tomb. The distance of the march is about six miles. MOXCMKNT SUBSCRIPTIONS.

The principal newspapers here announce their willingness to receive subscriptions for the (Irani Monument, toward which C.uuo were suoscriDed yesterday. It is proposed toliinit the time for subscribing, as to guard against a repetition of the Bartholdi Statue experience, invitations New" York, TO EX-CABINET 'MEMBERS. July 31st. The following invitation to ex-members cf his fathers Cabinet, was issued to-day by Col. Fred.

Grant. Ths undersigned respectfully invites all ex-members of his father Cabinet to at- tend the obsequies to be held on the 8th prox in New York. Gentlemen accept tag this invitation are respectfully re quested to ad4ise Gen, Hancock of theii present, and he will assign them appropriate places in the procession. Fred D. Grant.

Mt. McGrkjor, July 31st. Ex-Post- aster-General of Grant's Cabi net, arrived on the train this morning. PROCLAMATION! OF ARIIOSAS GOVERNOR. Prescott, A July 31st.

The fol lowing proclamation was issued yesterday by tJov. Office qv mi Governor, July 30, 1883. Arizona: With inexpressible sorrow the pedple of America contemplate the loss to the! Nation of the eminent citi- zn aud thai pre-eminent Bbldier, IT. Grant. With grateful love! throughout every State and Territory of the grand achievements and Union his noble character are reserved.

Pride in his great name nils every American heart, and the sentiment re sounds in all the nations of tbe earth. He is gone from among ue, and it is fitting aud in accord with the; universal desire, that public expression be given to the grief of a. mourning nation. Now, therefore, F. A.

iTritle, Governor of Arizona. do hereby proclaim Saturday, August 8th, the dayj named for the burial of Gen. Grant, aa a day of especial mourning; and sorrow throughout this Territory, and I earnestly recommend an request that on that day all business, public iand private, be suspended, and that all the people of Arizona unite; in demonstrations of sorrow and fitting obsequies to the illustrious dead. F. A.

Tbitle, Governor. The public buildings' throughout the city are being draped. Masonic! Mail, where Barrett Post meets, has been draped both inside and out, and memorial services will be hel I on August 8th, nnder the auspices of ths Post, assisted by the regular troops from WhiDDte Barracks and tha secret societies and pivilians of Prescott. Drowsiness In the Day-time. Unless caused by lack of sleep or from over-eating, is a symptom of disease.

If it be accompanied by general debility, head ache, loss of appetite, coated tongue and sallow ComDlSxlon, yon may; be sure that you are suBemng from biliousness and con sequent derangement of the stomach and bowels. Ur. iinerce 1 leasant Jrurgative Pellets" are sure cure for all ailments of this nature. jThey cleanse and purify the blood and relieve tne digestive organs. Grain Festival.

The Slavonic Hlyric Mutual Benevolent Association jvill hold their twenty -eighth annual festival at Stevens Psrk next Sun. day, August j. 2d. Forty Mineable prizes will be competed tor. Ursnd performance, commencing at it.

day and evening I A Wavlkinc Skeleton. Mr. E. Springer, of Mechanicsbur, Pa. writes; "I was afflicted with lung fever and abscess on lungs, and reduced to walking Skeleton.

Got a free trial bottle of Dr. King a New! Discovery for dnsumption, which did me so much good that bought a dollar bottle. After usinar three bottles. found myself once more a man, completely M. a 1 ft ft restored to neaiin, wim a nearty appetite and a srm in flesh of 4a fba." Call at KIHKLAN TROWBRIDGE'S Drug Store and get a free trial bottle of this certain cure for all Lung Jiseaesj.

lArge Dottles i.uu. Thb Pacing Ram ia Dromnt. undent. prusperoua ana perpetual, w- The Crisones Wife Under Cross-Examination. A- A.

Moored pointed Questions to Mrs. Prindle. An Ear.ter Sunday that Occurred in Mar Mis. Prindle Weeps To-day While Testifying. Sharp Discussions between Counsel on the Admissability of Evidence.

Her Cross-Examination eluded at A 31. Con- It will be remembered that when Mrs. Prindle was first brought into court to hive her testimony, at 1:30 on Wednesday afternoon, that the defendant was re moved frjim his seat beside counsel to the other side of the ccurt, where it was impossible for husband and wife to see each other. This was done after consultation, as the unhappy conple had not met since the shooting, and it was probably deemed lest facing her husband, Mrs. Prindle might find it impossible to' give her testimony.

Yesterday, hjowever, the defendant moved a little forward to the Sheriff's chair, from which, through the railings of the Clerk's desk, he could gt glimpses cf his unhappy wife, as she sat painfully telliog her stery, as related in yesterday's issue of The Tbibcne. STOPS HER EARS. Mrs. Fred, Prindle, the sister-in-law, whose affectionate solicitude for the unhappy woman is a subject of general remark, sat bravely all through the terrible Revelations yesterday though she heard little or none of them, for when the questions'' put necessarily indicated answers thatTmust be shocking, the young sister-in-law stopped both her ears with her fingers. During the morning, when counsel for defense thought that Mrs.

Prindle was fainting, she sprang to her side at once. The crowd this morning at ten o'clock was not bo great as that of yesterday, the specta tors probably.thiuking that the worst rev elations naOJaesa nnu niai. mere was little more for their depraved tastes to feed upon. Nevertheless, the railing near where the witness sits was crowded eight 'or ten deep with curious idlers. Tlie Mxtli Day.

Judge Gibson disposed of an hour's busi-Bess previous to the resumption of the tviI, and at 10 o'clock the jury were called and answered to their names. Mrs. Prindle cam? into Court, her sister-in-law taking a seat near the lawyers' table with her husband beside lier. Mr. Moore resumed the cross-examination of Mrs.

Prindle. Sue was as on the previous two days, and appeared composed though pale. that beside the places she mentioned she did not remember any others at which she had lived. On being questioned further she admitted having lived at Mrs. PrayX-on Webster street.

My husbani took mis there; I lived there two weeks; I went to live in'AIaineda, I think, as near as I can remember, five years and a half ago; Dr. Buck had been my medical adviier on two occasions when I was sick; 1 am not quite sure it was more than five-nd a half years ago; I had one room at Mrs. Ilardenbergh'e on the second floor; Itlie room adjacent to mine was not occu-' Ved; the rooms near mine were occupied "ntr' a -while; on Kaster Sunday, and up to May 24th, these rooms were occupied and K. Wells; there was a lady ttjere. too, for two weeks; I forget her uamer General Hardenbergh was sick at the tiale; the furniture in my room was a walnut be'd, Alarge mirror and a lounge; I occupied that room for I think a little over seven THAT SASfKR SUNDAY.

It was about 9 o'clock on Easter Sunday that iTcpinnaenced to make the-disclosures to roy husband; there was no one present besides myself and I said I wanted to spesk to him; after I commenced to "tell him he went out and did not return until about 9 o'clock at night Mr. Moore called the witness' attention to the transcript of her direct testimony wherein she said that her husband had -walked the floor on Eastei Sunday Sundaynd then said he was going out and did not know When he was coming back, llie witness stated she could not have 8a id that that occurred on Easter Sunday. Th a1 id hat De walked the floor at anoth' interview. A DISPUTE. jr Whitaiore, of counsel for the de-fencer disputed that the witness had stated that her husband walked the floor Easter Sunday.

Mr. Mojre read tha transcript of the testimony. Mr. Whitmore objected to Mr. Moore rea-Jin? the testimony.

But Mr. Moore inistd that it fixed the day on Easter Sunday, continued to read. Mr; Moore If it wasn't Easter Sunday when he went away and di Jn't come back until night, when was it? Objection was interposed by Mr. nit- inore. The objection was' overruled and the witness stated that on several occasions twt ha went awav when I went to tell The witness stated that she could not WWe the dates of any cbarsre except Easter Sanday and the last day (May24tb) when I made statements to my husband concern-in? myself and Dr.

Buck. The witnes couM-not state what day of the month that Eaater Sunday came on and in. She was of "the opinion that Easter faunday was in May. Mr. Moore then questioned her minutely, and ascertained that the Sunday she referred to as Easter Sunday, was- the Sunday of the day of tha homicide.

She then in response to another question, saia tnas the did not commence making the disclos-(ures on Easter Sunday. On Easter Sunday the witness stated that hnsband dined at the same table with fcer at Mrs. Hardsnburg's. She stated that he eoDld not say that her husband went to hie business daily dating the two months ever which extended her confession. She supposed he attended to his business regularly; he had a buggy and dreve down from Melrose wfcen necessary; he kept hie buggy la Mr.

Hardenburg'e stable; he remained away from hie work occasionally when necessary; she did not know that he remained away any more frequent after aba began to make the disclosures than formerly- ti Mr. Moore then asked tha witness to srWn besides her husband she had made -disclosures to. The question was objected to and sns- ttainsd. couldn't hxmiubir. Moors continued ackinz witness, if.

Ha teUing her husband about having madr in regard to herself to the AVaksfieids aod the Martina, the witness rttrt not iwmoanher about the Wakefield. -and If she did not remember what she said About the Martins. Mt. Moor Is it so, that, In December i promoting the the whole internal economy. irw removal or bile from the blood, increase! activity of the live-, nally dormant a cases of costivems.

and sjund durestion fol lows the' use of this beneficent medicine, as thorough and srenial in its effects as it is sa'e aod pure jn composition. Kheumatism, fever and ague, kidney troubles aod debility are remedied by it. i Scott's Emulsion of Pare Cod Liver Oil wlthypopbosphites. specially HiluahUfor Children. Pr.

J. R. Fkatskk, Hem-phis, says: "I regard Eeott's Emulsion as valuable medicine-for tha diseases of adults, f.r children teethinsr and I irklv children." rfrrF! J1IMXG STOCJPA HXPOK1. Baa FnAaoisco, July 31, 1886. MORircra ialss ssaDLAS ssbsioi.

530 ft 2 10.il 16 200 Cale. Re 50 MD ..1 85 125 Ophir. 1 20 200 80c 360 Peer .,..1 25 10 3 50 300 Cbollar 1 100 Point 1 10 lee Con Cal MOiC ..1 30 100 Potosi. 3oc N. 5J(35 600 Sav 75 1 0 Holmes 3 SO leu scorpion .1 Oc 400 Sierra 1 S6j6(l 30 200 Silver 25e 100 Union 200 Jus i.

150 Mexican 80c 250 Mono 1 2. TE9TSKSAT ATTBKNOOS tlUS RSSULAA SB8SION 100 2-3S 15 100 Mono 1 20 500 751 70 1060 .1 00855c 150 Bulwer 000 201 25 200 Overman SOc 100 Jeer. .1 05 700 Savage 1 85 1000 10c 050 Sierra If 1 40 150 Union 75c 250 Con Cal 85 100 .3 25 200 4t 280 ft 616 AW Holmes. 4 50 (t3 45 450 Mex shipping am Fraaclsco 30. 1885 Arrivals.

Thtr-sday. Ju'y 30. Schr Jennie Griffin. Bnvle. 24 hours from.

Point Keres; 5 his butter, ti Oage. anattuck and Cs. cnr Heeeee. tienaerson, 13 days from Port 361 lumoer, to Kenton Holmes and Co. Clearances.

i Thursday, July 30. Stmr Santa Rosa. Johnson. San Siesra: Rand. an.

ersina ana jo. St.ssr Oreiton. Pol-man. Astoria; OB1X Co. Bktne Discovery.

Meyer. Honolulu: Williams. TH mosd and Co. i Htm (cbr Surprise. Roberts.

Giiavmas: Ttorla ami UOB. 1 i I FRIDAY; July 3L Br stmr Barnard Castle. Smith. Kanaimo: xsunsuiuir Cfons Departures. I Th tritsoAY.

July 30. Stmr Santa Rosa. Johnson. San Diego. tmr santa truz.

tiaii, iximpoc. Stm Detttners, Rockport, Bktne Discovery, Meyer. Honolulu. Schr Lizzie Derby, Christopheraon, Navairo, Schr Nora Harkias, Harkins, Sclir Eppinger. Johnson.

New Haven. Schr Wing and Wing, Bendegard, Schr Bobolink. Aadndson. Schr Bill the Butcher, vanson, Bowen's Landing. xx xvuapp, r.oufien( 8chr Daisy Rowe, Peterson.

Cuffy's Cove Bchr 5usie KUose, Jobannsen, Westport. Schr Ida Fiorerce. Juchter, Cuffey's Cove, Schr John Frederick Htevenson. Timber Cove. Schr Fairy Queen, Erickson.

Santa Cruz. Friday, "July 3L. Stmr Oreson, Poleman, Astoria. Scor Esptnosa, Anderson, Boliuas, -Schr Jennie Grithn, Boyle, Poiot Reyes. Schr Congdon, Nelton, Bodega, Schr Lulu, Johnson, Stewart's Point.

Lavtest from Point Lottos P. M. Octbidk. Bound Is Br bark Oriente. schr Chtistina Steffens and siare rigger.

DEEDS AND MORTGAGES. Specially Reported, up to Soon Each Day, for j. runme, DEEDS. Friday. July 31.

WW Spencer to Hubert-Lots 29 and 30, White House Plot, Oakland township Susan Hays to James White 23x104.64, Eleventh. 185 from West, Oakland Henry and wife to Todd Lots 8 and 700 1125 67 diocr J. faraaise r-ara. UAKiana townsiiin Geo Stierlen to John Copp Seventh, 100 from weoster street, fi Mi. luu.

3k. JN 50. 20, 50 to Seventh. Oakland 7000 Erminia Dtrgie to Josef a reralta Undi vided of 24t acres on San Leandro creek, and 107.22 acres adjoiningGeo KinseU In Peralta Raucho. Brook lyn township Grant Rieser et alto John EverdingT- Undivided 140xt0, Second street, J0 iM from University avenue, and 55x100, Second.

250 from University avenue. Berkeley. 1900 John UiUilana and wife to Adam Giluland 32x115. Kirkham. 175 from Tenth.

2400 Estate Sarah Hastings to Mrs Har ford 7x155, ti xleirent street. 217.10 from San Jose avenue. Alameda. 105 It Mostrom to Olsen 100x100. on line street, Union City 250 MORTGAGES.

Friday, July 31. Little and wife to Peck Subdivision lot 5, blook 73. Watts Tract, Oakland. 150 Xhos Kelly and wife to German Havings and Loan Society 75x75, at NE corner Fifth and Castro streets, Oakland 2200 McDonald to Wm Uhislett Lots 1 and 4. block 21, Berkeley Villa Association, Berk'y 800 Antonio lvee to John xtooken 1 we tracts on avenne.

Haywards 600 Thomas to Strjbel A Nendeck 60xl? Castro, 360 NW from street. Haywards. 850 41 ti Byrne to.tierman Pavings and Loan Society Center Pine street, 157 from center Rose. 319 329 2 to Spruce street; also center Rose and Walnut streets, 476 to Center Pine street, Berkeley 3S0O ureen to Bame-K wxiau, at JSJS corner Oak street and Pacific avenue, Alameda 400 ueo weiu to nan rancinoo Haviegs Union -Lots 5. 8, 7.

22, 23. 24. Oakland iew Hd. Oakland Township 750 TTE HAVE JUST OPENED AND ARE CON stanuy receiving the very latest patterns in Ornaments for the Mantel, Ornaments for the Table, Wedding: Presents Birthday Presents, I Brie a Brae, JEtcEtc Also, a large variety of One and cheap colored GLASSWARE, Which ws are offering at vary low prices. A.

SWAIN CO 16 Post St, Baa Francisco, CaL The Oldest aod Only American Crockery Store toe utty. DR. IiORTEA'S iMEVJ HAr.ir.iAr; 218 POST S. F. The heat and bosS Imiilous Turkish.

Russian, Electric, aad Medicated Bath Bouse to too city. Opsn day aad night. eUnals beasts for 1, or twelve tusftiol.

Get access to Newspapers.com

  • The largest online newspaper archive
  • 300+ newspapers from the 1700's - 2000's
  • Millions of additional pages added every month

About Oakland Tribune Archive

Pages Available:
2,392,182
Years Available:
1874-2016