Panama City News-Herald from Panama City, Florida on September 16, 1973 · Page 9
Get access to this page with a Free Trial
Click to view larger version

Panama City News-Herald from Panama City, Florida · Page 9

Publication:
Location:
Panama City, Florida
Issue Date:
Sunday, September 16, 1973
Page:
Page 9
Cancel
Start Free Trial

Page 9 article text (OCR)

NKWS-IIKK/\IJ). I'ananiii City, l'ra.,Suii(la.v,S<«|it»'mlMr lira PaR('9/\ NEW YORK - (NEA) More than 80 per cent of the nation's newspaper editors would rather go to jail than reveal confiudtial news souices. A recent poll of 345 editors indicated that 83 per cent are "prepared" or "prob- ablv prepared" to face jail if ordered by a grand jury to reveal protected sources. The same poll showed that editors arouna the country are almost equally divided on whether or not they favor a national shield law for reporters. A, strong 70 per cent of those polled feel that the "free press" clause of the First Amendment is absolute and requires no interpretation, while 65 per cent thought that a National Press Council to monitor the national media was unequivocally or probably a bad idea. These attitudes were revealed in a poll taken recently by Newspaper Enterprise Association of 560 newspapers who subscribe to NEA's aaily service. Of the editors polled, 345 — or 62 per cent - responded. Lawrence Sawyer, of the Terre Haute, (Ind.) star took issue with the majority on protecting confidential sources: No. Once in a blue moon this might be necessary, but cases I know about involved joining forces with unsavory groups in exchange for some dubious scoops." Many editors who were prepared to go to jail to protect sources, said that it would depend on the specific case. John A. Jones, of the Johnson, City (Tenn.) Press- Chronicle, answered less equivocally: "Yes. Without sources, we would depend Editors back source protection, split on national press shield law / M A V 1.1 Jiet 11.. 1 _. .rrl %f\tt\A oUe/xliitn nrtA iin^i^n^ Kictit* A Hn>.> In... »:»L.i . . . . i ^ i upon government PR men to [ill us in.' Experience has shown that they will not and can not give the press what it needs to adequately present the happenings of government — from the courthouse to the White House. " Responding to the "jail" question. Charles W. Utter of the Westerly (R. I.) Sun wrote: "Yes. Will YOU go with me?" "I'd like to say yes, but I wonder what I'd do, in fact, if the challenge arose," answered John 0. Hjelle, of the Bismarck (N.D.) Tribune. While the editors surveyed split 48 per cent to 45 per cent on whether or not they favor a "shield" law for reporters, WORLD ALMANAC the difference really turns on a question of means rather than principle. All but a handful of the editors feel'that reporters should be protected. Many Question whether a "shield is the best way to secure such protection. "Yes," wrote Leonard Schubert of the Marinette (Wis.) Eagle-Star, favoring the proposed "shield" legislation, "(but) I prefer the constitutional protection which seemed to function for years until the courts broke it down." Many editors who supported the shield specified that it should he absolute and unconditional — for instance, Sandra Thorson of the La Porte (Ind.) Herald-Argus, who supports Sen. Alan Cranston's (D- Calif.) bill guaranteeing journalists "absolute privilege." The majority of "shield" opponents feared that such a law might open the door for further congressional limitation of reporters' rights. Richard Day, of the Montrose (Colo.) Daily Press, argued: "Any law would delineate the areas covered by the 'shield,' thus creating specific 'non- shield' areas. The courts should handle the issue as it arises on an individual case basis. A new law might open the floodgates for other, restrictive legislation." A few opponents of the law feared it might lead to licensing of reporters and photographers, while a substantial minority opposed the idea on the grounds that "reporters are citizens like everybody else. If the li'irst Amendment does not offer sufficient protection in .specific cases, they should be prepared to go to jail to protect sources," wrote James Oliver of the Albert Lea (Minn.) Tribune. On whether the "free press" clause of the First The custom of clothing baby boys in blue began because of a belief that evil spirits which would harm a male child could be kept powerless by blue, which was thought to have divine powers, The World Almanac says. Girl babies were not given a "protective" color because they were considered inferior and evil spirits would not take interest in them. Amendment is absolute and requires no interpretation, opinions diverged sharply. "Yes. No law means NO LAW," wrote Robert Lewis, of the Troy (Ala.) Messenger. "No. I have not heard of a single item in the Bill of Rights which is absolute. We are being idealistic and selfish to think so," countered Stan Voit of the Natchez (Miss.) Democrat. Patrick Bushey, of the KIama,th Falls (Ore.) Herald and News, feared that an "absolute" interpretation would leave the door open to pornography. "Given an absolute choice, I'd take press freedom with pornography, but I feel we can have one without the other." But while 70 per cent of those polled feel that the First Amendment is explicit and should not be construed to limit press freedom, many of them added, "I'm afraid the Supreme Court doesn't agree with me." While only six per cent of the respondents felt that a National Press Council was a good idea, several editors agreed with Fred Brown, of the Sterling (Colo.) Journal- Advocatp that "self-regulation is infinitely preferable to government regulation." Others, like Garner Allen, of the Stuttgart (Ark.) Daily Leader, wondered: "Who then monitors the Council? God?" A large number of editors feared that the establishment of such a voluntary council would encourage governmental regulation of the press. To preclude such official or voluntary intervention, editors called for more critiques from trade magazines, for more competition to provide "monitoring", and for continuing reliance on reader criticism to assure fair coverage. TIGRE'S COOL — At least one dog in suburban Taylor, Mich., is ready for the next heat wave, even if his masters are not. Tigre, a heavy-coated, ^nnonth-old, 120-pound St. Bernard, has his own air-conditioned doghouse. Mr. and Mrs. Abe Jones said the extremely high temperatures in August caused illness in Tigre and they felt this wou\6 be cheaper than continual medical treatment. Jones helped install a 5,000 BTU unit in the 4 foot high, 4 foot by six foot doghouse. The Jones' home is not air conditioned, but they don't have to wear t.—t fur coat all summer. (UPI) Sale! Kenmore SMOOTH TOP Range with Ceramic Coolctop and Self-Cleaning Oven! 2 Days Only Regular $499.95 Beautiful 3()-incli electric range lias heating elements beneatli a ceramic cooktop for easy clean-up! Use the ceramic cooktop as uii extra worktable when you're not cooking. As an added convenience, the automatic oven is self-cleaning. With Lo-Temp oven control, fluorescent worklighl. Buy now and save! Use Sears Easy Payment Plan Searn Care Service pro- teclB iJic valiicof your Kciiinore Range. Wc Horvice what w«! sell, wlicrcvcr you live or niuy move in the U.S.A. What a Buy! 30-inch Kciiniorc Electric Range Look at the low, low price for this dependable elciUric range! One 8-in. and three 6-in. plug-in surface units. Lift-up porcclain-cnanuded cooktop for ca.sy cleaning. Surface and oven indicator lights. Uandy storage drawer for your pots and pans. regular $179.95 139 SHOP AT SEARS AND SAVE SatUfaction Quaranteed or Your Money Back SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. Anniversary Celebration DOWNTOWN PANAMA CITY 509 llarriHun Ave 763-6611 OPEN 9:30 Daily STARTS MONDAY 3 DAY SALE ALL OUR WHITE SHEETS Reduced for 3 days 20% OFF 3 DAYS ONLY! Colo 1 75 —"^•^^B^" • twin size, ^#^^1^^ I flat or fitted Reg. 2.19. Our white muslins are 50% cotton, 50% polyester for long wear. Fitted sheets have elasticized corners. Flats have 3-inch top hem; 1-inch bottom hem. Penn Prest, of course. Full size, reg. 2.79 Sale 2.23 Pkg. of 2 pillow cases, reg. 1.39 Sale 1.11 Sale 3'' Reg.3.99. Penneys percales are as practical as they are luxurious. 50% cotton, 50% polyester for long wear. Penn Prest for no ironing. Flat and fitted sheets are the same price. Pillow Cases Reg. 2.09 Sale J.67 FULL SIZE WOVEN BEDSPREADS $J99 each White and Solid Colors standard size bed pillow with Kodei'S polyester fiber filling and Penn-Prest ticking. Machine washable. Sdl6 6^'full size Reg. 7.99. Machine washable polyester with nylon binding. In an exciting assortment of patterns and colors. Vinyl zipper bag carry case. Twin size, reg. 5.99, Sale 4.79 SOLID THERNALS ALSO REDUCED 20% OFF ENTIRE STOCK OF REGULAR BLANKETS 3 DAYS ONLY JCPenney We know what youVe looking for. 437 HARRISON AVE. DOWNTOWN P.C.

Get full access with a Free Trial

Start Free Trial

What members have found on this page