The Times from London, Greater London, England • Page 5

THE TIMES, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16,, 1897. 5 LAW REPORT, Sac 13. TISOOUXT ESEUCa'S S'ARKWKLL. tb. Lord Ether, the lata Muter sau, wi54 Mr umU to tU Br Bto caused Ird Chief JatUeV Court to Ztjtl to tU utroott etpectty.

II it generally under toed tit Ox May i Jrt ot the Bar ton da, to the fact that tr4 rbrt detlred to pottpon th etmaioB watO tb Lord Chief Justice wu eufficieaUy tftftmi. rron bU recent aecUeut to able to tit ia Court fi After judicial career ot more than ti tl oi whirh were rot la th Court ot Appeal, Jtu fitting ttet the members cf th Bar thould hr cpportaaity of showing by titlr prwww on thi vreatie th aSectlocate reTct uj esteem la which Lord jiijer )xU. Appointed ort Ice of the Court of Cowane Dui ia August, lete. be transferred is October, 18TC, to th Coort cf Appeal, and ia April, 1SS3, wreath of Sir Crorg Jeasel, he wa bsJ Matter of th KoU, wUch Utter petition tie held cattl tit tetiremeat career, aa the Attorney General uJJ. of contiauou and increasing racer.

A rareef each, length opon the Beach is without pr radeat, ta the reseat century at all events, unlets, indeed, it it rctJihla to make aa exception in the rase toei Slowell, bo bejrsn hit judicial career at the end ox tM lui reawrv wnea ta uctoter, appointed Judje of the Admiralty Coort (a Coort which, it matt he mentioned, waa not a Coort of Record until recent year, and which could ia former lira have opto prohibited by the Cmrmon Law Courts), and who drd net retire until February, 1S23. It a corKMjt fact that tbe next longest judicial flr Lord Eaber 't wa that of another Judge af the Admiralty Coort, Dr. Ltnhingtoa, tat ia that iVwrt for seailT S9 yeare, and before whom Lord Esber, whra at the. Bar, Lad a Try large practice.1 Euch Jadgct aa Lord Udoa, Daren Parte. Lord liUckhorn, ad Lord BramweU tencd for a icof time open the Inrh.

but none ot tbeta to lrf Lord Kihrr. it wa therefore not to be wondered at that the orcaMoa excited mtorett. From the hoar of 10 'dock, thoaich the proceeding! were oot ansoanced to coameare aul 11 o'clock, tbe Courv cerao 10 ui irluetr with meeehrra of the Bar. aad at tbe hour 11 aprached to full did tbe acaU reterred fcr the lUrMcome that the unatoal aprcttr'e wat tcca cf tarmbera ot the Joaior lUr, headed by Sir. Pollard, Uhiar poaarattoa of the jnrr box a prcceedmc which a(Kse aantemcct in Court.

The ririrate tKtry of tbe Court wat tiled with ladict, aod Lady Esher aad two other ladiet who were with her were accommodated with aeata at the leek cf the Ueactu The Queen 'a Cocael who weie earot iacloded the AttorDcy CroerU (Sir Richard Hebftcr), the Solieitereneral (Sir It. B. Fislay), Mr. Coacnt Ilardy. Cfben, Vr.

Mr naaanooet. Sir. Ilaldane. llr. Shirrta Will.

Sir, Buckley, Mr. klrCall, Mr. J. Catler, llr. GceJd.

ilr. L.I I I Kr. Cock. tHr. Cramp.

Sir. anhall, 31r. Abel Ttxvr.f, air. ISke, Jlr. lUiket, Mr.

Ure, klr. J. V. Fitxrerald. V.r.

Kcere. Mr. CaodT. llr, ftractm, Mr. WeJdtibcrn, and with thera Kir Walter Phillimcre.

who. thouch not a Queen 'i tVvswl, hold a patent: of preccoertce. The junior liar waa alto fully rrpretcnted. The Queen' Be xsembraDcer (Matter Georre rouoek), JBaater llutler, Kutu tVilherforee. the Muter of the Crown flutter llallor).

Mr. RrfijriTr UiSard, and Mr. Jotcph IHrit (the Attoeiate) were alto freaest. runetually to the moment of 11 the Lord aCUicf Jttttire of England entered the Court, accompanied by Lord Ether, who were a frock coat with a Cower ia tut button hole, and followed by the endenarntioeed JnJjrt The Matter oIUMKoUt, Mr mndi Jctsn. Lord Jntttc A.

1. Ftaith, Lord Justice Bisby, Lord Jnttica Chitty, Lord Juttiot Collio. Lord Jottice Vaneoaa tTilliamt. Mr. Juttice Mathew, Mr.

Jottice Bame. Mr. Jottice Kennedy, Mr. Jottice Ihfham, Mr. Jsttiee Darurx, Mr.

Justice North, Mr. Juttire Urim(. Mr. Juttice Ktkewich, Mr. Justice Bomtr, aivi Ur.

Juttice Byrne. JU the circuit! are now on. evtril Jodse were nece. earily abtent. and aereral eocmtel were away, installing manr of thorn vpon Lord Ether' old crcnit.

the tCoribem. Mr. Jottice Chacnell wa alto unable to be uncut, fcariag been called vpon Up take Mr. Baron Ttiiork a rlaee at the Chclmaford Atstre owing to the larW'a iOneat. Vrxm the rirht of the Lord Chief Jottice aat Lord Eer, and npoa hi left at the Matter of the BoD.

Their Lordihip taring taken their aeat, The ACTOit Gxsxbju. aJdreeead Lord' Ether a foUowt, all the xsember ot the Bar. My Lord Ether, Tour Lordthjp ha been gooi encrofh to be pceaent here to day in order that on behalf ot the profeation of which, you hare been for to many year a diitinfuiihed on) anient, might bid yon a few word of farewell. My Lord, recognixinff in yon another of thoa diatiBfoiahed adroeate wha trace no until part of their suooea to the fact that they joined the great Northern Circuit, I doubt not that yon owe come of your keen appreciation of clear and incisive argument to tne tact ua yon naa among your competitor ana mall audi men a Edward Junes, Sttphen Tempi, and tieorre MeUisa, ana tome of who were privileged to ynwetue in the old Court of Admiraltr remember wall tbe diatinguiald petition yon attained there when Dr. Xnihinrten wa its Jodce.

a Kotition which ha made mark on many yodxmenta delivered durfcc the last SO year. But, my Lord, interesting to you and to ut a mar be reference to tout Lordthin' career at the 2lar, it it upon your Lordihip' position aa a Judge that I desire for a few moments to dwell. When, xay Xord, in 1S68, you relinquished the high position of fcoiicitor CJaneril to become one of the Judge of the old Court of Common Fleas, there were ust a few bo thoocht that too had (omewhat abrurtlr tennhiated mhat might hare tern a great Parliamentary or 1 create career. 4 lut, my Liord, a Tew monuis wen oScient to txlntf all that in Undertaking tbe great rMocsibtlrties af a Judge yon were accepting tbe duties of an office which you were well qualified to fulfil. My Lord, many of remember the great commercial 2rr of prosperity and tha Guildhall sittings unshorn cf any of their ancient glery, and can rnsraher the trial of mairr csqkc in which your Lordship' busio LSOwteige ana acquaintance witn resmraii anair came oat in strong relief.

My Lord, your Lordship's translation to the Court of Appeal ia 1S7C, and yonr Lordship' ejection as Master of the Bolls, following te cf the quiekrt thinker who ha arer adorned the XfegUth Bench, are steps in your career which cut with xaurenal approval and approbation. I pause not to eoosider whether the 29 yean during which your Lord, ship has occupied jndicisl position is without rreeedent, but thi I say, without fear of criticism, that from the day when your Lordship frrt tat upon the Bench until the daj of jour retirement jour career hat brcacoe of eortmuout and increasing success, a our Lcrdhip made your Court a tribunal for! business men ia which mercantile nsage and mercantile custom were grasped and appreciated, and while, my Lard, you en deavusred to trine to bear to the case which yon had to decide all the leg if knowledge at your disposal, you never any legal technicalities to interfere with what yon believed to be substantial justice. My Lord, we at the Bar hare winced at times under the (torching criticism of onr arguments enticistc which led us to stsnd tout Lordship would have wished ut to stand up, against the interlocutory comments, for the noment per hap advert to the view which we were expressing on behalf of our client. Bnt your Lordship' ccament left no ting tehind, and on refUxtion we felt that your great object wa first to ascertain tbe ftcU, and then to endeavour to see that juttice should to dene. My Lord.

I have hot one more word to tav. There is one feeling to which expression crest be given, aad that is the eonviction which ha rested in tbe heart cf every member of the Bar of your constant and unswerving loyalty to our profession. Lord, though you weTe fsr above us, you still wished to be one of ta yoo respected onr want and our aspirations you lave shared our jcy snd our sorrows. My Lord, it is this feeling which made it impossible that yoo should to allowed to retire in tDence it it this feeling which wiS link yoo with in the future a it ha in the Tt it It thi feeling which will make yon carry with yon a wealth of good withe of far mors valua than any feUe words in which I have expressed them it is this feeling which makes it so difficult for me to say th word which can scarcely be uttered by friend I mean, fsrewell. (Loud cheer.) Loki Eihzk.

My dear Attorney General, and all ot you here, I have had tome difficulty in jroming to a determination at to the character in whjeh I wa to addres yoo. I am no longer a Judge, and I hardly, far a time, wa able to determine erhat lam. lam 3 one of you, as I think. I am a erjeant at law. I am a barrister of more than I ten year' (tending.

(Laughter.) I am capable of being appointed a County Coart Judge (laughter), or to sit a a Commissioner to held an Assize. (Laughter.) I am therefore now what litre always tried to be, and what I have always tred to make too feel that I wa during the whole tinve I a Judge namely, one yoo, and, only yocr equals, it true teas on we uencu, woeu I as in the position of an oScer on the quarter deck, I had snd was oUired to eive occasionally word of eoxouni hot the moment one leave the deck one i Bctkitg but a fellow officer, aad 1 hat been nothing 2 a fellow barrister with you always. It is ib that rhsocter therefor tint I desire to sneak to TOO to day. Kow, next came to my mind what should be the on wfcuh I should adopt Snail it be tbe tone ol sad nett a of a last dying tpeeeh aad confession, or thaU I asy that which I feel that I am a happy a a man 1 tare been a Jodge assisted by you all, by most of ivi muo sre Bern present, ty timott au tee proienion, lor mil mm. is the loo rest period ever known during which a Jodge ha tat on the Bench a a Jodge.

I believe so but I am jw tore. I have ceased to be a Jodge, and the that mirk sod your rreeee bre to dsy, and saying tlT taut, nave madotne not onrr nappy, tvt a fcireT a a man rsn rassiUv be. Von have mentioned the mode in which, or tie circumstance der which, I became a Judge. Well, all I will say to et yon is this I became a Judce because 1 had mad im my mind and will from the beginning that I beck. snd that there were not occasionally times when i thought that Iti what people call parsed over.whicU vvr really exist, a ther Is nothing to pas over, be icawewe are an equals but what I said to myself ram, uw caeca, out a wu wv vu, IadIwiawtUlitoplt I rseoasmead thtt to yo aQ.

There I Mother rlrewnv I stance, which 1 hop exUtt with maay of yon that whenever there ram a chek, or whenever then earn diflSculty, I bad one by soy side who assisted me with aa ret ton ana wtui wire cooneai. esxi woo i ana pctnetpal cans of my nee ia life. On thtt happy, occasion, then, let tpeak, net aadly, bnt wits joy, 1 rstire, not because I tniak I am totally enable now te rontiaue to act ai a Judge tUnghtcrV I thinr I could go on a little locrrr but 1 thought it right, considering th to which I tort ttttined, that there should be a period af absolute rt in order to prepare for the next stag. Now, ia considering what tha Attorney corral baa been good enough to say, I tvey consider it a if I were hi rUrat. lie na sau maay tamgt ot sdv wuru, ots eiient, 1 can only tty ham been as happily tid at could be saia lie naa sera rpaeaiua: subssiubsw.

can only that for one he hts not ccsvmced me, by what be hat said, thtt 'bat be ha aid i correct. i may say tcis ss to my own swum since waa nJadfe I feel ronddent that aTer obist one single eevatioa at any period of my judicial career hare I done aajthtot except try, from the beginning of each cae until it waa ended, to get at tha troth a ths matter. I have nettr allowed toy atUaticn to ba ratled to anything elie in Court. Thar listened to 1 lute listened to argument, and I have tried to lest tbcra and to consider them aa they went 00 and my great detire was, Crt of all, to come to a richt dttemtcatien at to what the truth of the rase In respect of which tbe parties were ia dispute. 1 tjvek, of course, of.

civil actions. I have never been an enetriT to the prellmintry mode of investigation porter of the meant by which tha parties ran bring themselves to tbe real issue. I think that thote means are comttlmei, and not seldom, abused that people will take objection and Question aod insist oa right which tre net wanted in tbe particular rase. But, however thst msy. be, when once the case ha come into Ceurt my drilr and ecort bare ln to get at what it the true 'state of thing and whether there has torn a pre per compliance with the preliminary step at that moment haa become entirely immaterial.

I never could bring myself: to think that a judicial tribunal ourht to allcw a Tenon's richt to be, over thrown because there had lecn rome mistakes made ia th preliminary steps or investigation by there who were aaiiscrs. uru, uim: get, as i cave Inea r. i i i. consider what was the law. I am speaking, as 1 have said, of civil actions and disputes between carties; The duty of the Judge is to Cod oot what is the rule waica pecpie ot canaour ana nocour and liiroea in the position of the two partic would apply in respect to the matter in hand.

That it the eotrmcn law of England, and there i no other law. It is not only the common law, but it we go to Equity it the ssme thins. The law of Enrland is not a science it is a practical application ol tbe rule of rigbt and wrong to th particular case before the Cotrrt. And tbe canon of lew is that that rale should be adopted and applied to the rase which reople of honour and candour and fair ness in such a transaction would apply each to the Now, if that be so. if ssy supposed rule of law is rut forward which would prevent tbe rule of right bring applied, the suirosed rule of law most be wront I and if it eve be alleged that the law will pre vtnt the truth being esttUished and oblige the Court to say that that is not true which is true if ever anv such rule ot law is attempted to be pot forward it mutt be wrong, and I have alwj snd so.

No, what the rules ot right and in the particular cue are must be determined in each particular ease; but nobody cf have read the report of decision of great Judge from the earliest timet in England without trying to uxl in tbore report tbe mode and manner in which tnose Jodces have stated the rule of conduct of the Court, and that is what is called authority. But no decision at least, in my of any Judge as to the rule ot law other than in an Aet of Parliament can compel any Court now to ray that they were prevented from deciding that to be true which was in rcainy true were is so sum imng ra sue law rule which say that the Court shall determine that to be true which tha Court believes and know to ba untrue. Now, those being the rolea of conduct which 1 have laid down for myself I have tried to carry those rules through. I have been assisted, a you must all know, by Judge sitting with whose aid has been to me. inestimable.

I been fortunate enough to retire, as I sty, with a mark, an unusual mark, given to me a mart wolca I ttunk ba never been jgircn to any Judge for mere legal conduct (ino the time ot Lord Ccke. I have received that mark from the Quern, and that mark can leave nothing for me to wish. I now have received from yoo thi kind greeting, and I have only one painful word, a tha Attorney General 'he said, to use from beginning to end. and that is to tar to all of yon, Good bye. His Lordship then bowed to the Bsr, and, having shaken hands with some of the Judge, retired amidst hearty hand clapping on the part of the Bar and other inuoort.

girl he could lore, he trJght.iMktj ber hkwif." (LaogBtrr.) The plaintiff west on to question Lady Ballon about various letter the had received. Mr. Coc (mWrieeinr) read letter fro the; plaintiff, to which sir John Batten tent a reply inform, mg him that ho wa to tend na more latter to member of hi family, a they were Intuiting. The plsmtiff then proceeded to make a rambling statement, tad the Loio Cmr Jcvrics explained to him that ha must go on with his examination. Lady notion went en to tar thst th plaintiff only spoke to ber danghter twice, and had never written to him.

Her daerhter handed any letter (he received rem Mm unopened to her ftther. Tha pUlntiff then wished to read a letter be nad written to Sir Frederick PoUoek.beeaose be thought the whole of the scatter wa contained to thi letter, aad he had mt copy cf it to Mis llotton. Mr. Cock did hot object, and passage from the letter in question were read. II to the effect that te had mad an attempt reconciliation wnica bad been unsneressful.

lie also emoted extract from a letter from hi father. It appeared from the wiretpondence that tbe plaintiff bad mi a a brut mat present to ueay Mutton a Moodttalnrd Kernel and a medical certificate to tha effect thtt be bad tried to commit suicide. It also appeared ha had tent to young Mr, llotton a coal icnge to a duel. In answer ta Itr. TJv ffotton tatd the plain tiff had received no eocouragrmcnt, and tbe had asked turn to cease (ending annoying letter.

Boweri, which be had continued to do over two year. Tbe lohd Jrsncr, I tnere any lounuatioo that yoo or ber father were coercing your daughter and that she bad any affection fcr thi man witness. rsoue wnttevrr, ray wri. The Loin Cnirr Jmrcx. It teems to me that conceit i at ths bottom of thi case.

(Laogbter.) Lord Monktwell wtt then calleil and wss asked to prod ore come letter be had written to Sir Frederick I'oilock. It wu ubmitted they were not evidence, and ther were not reed. He laid he taw Sir John Hutton and beard hit tceount of the pUintLff't persecution of his aangntcr. In reply CoCK, Lord Monktwell (aid ttat at the reqnest of Fir Frederick Pollock he wrote the introduction cf the titaintiff whom be did cot know. Mr.

woun ncrDury saia inai oir ouotk out sisio some statement with reference to tbe plaintiff, and, therefore, hi name had been for election at the London Fencing Club. Sir Frederick Pollock (aid that when the nlaintiff't nam came up for election for tbe London Fencing CInb be made a statement to tee committee witn rrgaru to him, and in consequence hit election wt postponed pending inquiries. He 'should not hare invited the plaintiff as a guet to the club under those circam stances. Ttm riamtiff then went into the witness box. and said that Lady Flatten callol on htm twice and bn believed that Lady Mutton and Mirs llotton were not at one witn Jobn llotton in tbe matter, otnerwtso ae wouia not nave broopbt tbis action; The Cnixr Jrsrnci.

Ton would have been very well advirod not to have brought this action. Mr. (joes (utmittcd tnere was no cate to go to in im wbd cnisr jcsticr said be wx or opinion that there wtt no evidence of special damage and that the occasion on which the words were snokrn was rrivilcd: lie thought, however, it might be proper to ask ti jary wnetner tne tatemeni wss tree. The iurr intimated that ther were tmanimotnlT of opinion that it wa true and that there had hern a persecution of Mist uutton. jcoirmeni wat tnereuDon riven rot the eklrnuant.

Tbe Lokd Cmir Justicb fto the nlaistiif I think it right to tay that I do not believe you were actuated by dishonourable motives in bringing this action, but more than that I cannot say. I fail to understand a gentleman who professes affectfcn for a lady bringing an scum en euis nature. SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE. COURT OP APPEAL. Btfort Lorai JcsTica A.

L. Earra, Loud JrsTici l.IOBT, OM LOB.U JUSTICB UJUBO.) Titer fault CTctr akd tti MAirrratrnmixo QOXTAXT (UMITED) V. SAlTeDXUS. This was aa appeal from an order made by Mr. Justice Day at The action wa brought by the plaintiff company to recover from the defendant call in respect of share which had been allotted to hbx.

The defendant bad applied for these there on receiving from the company a protpectu, in which they were called the Dunlop Truflault Cycle and Tube Manufacturing Company (Limited). Ac injunction having been obtained in the Chancery Division by the Dunlop Pneumatie Tyre Company restraining the tlaintiff eomnanv from nsinr the word DunloD as tart ot their name, the defendant complained that he had been deceived by the use of that word in tha protpectut, and he refused to keep the share, and demanded repayment ot the application money. Tbe plaintiff thereupon commenced thi action, and took and llr. Justice Day made order giving them leave to ign final judgment far the amount claimed. The defendant appealed, and asked the Court ot Appeal to give him unconditional leave to elefeod.

It wa pointed out on the pirt of the plaintis that there was on the face of the prospectus a statement printed in red ink to the effect that tbe company wat talt eOBtained, nd waa not in any connected wttb toe Utmlop I'Dfutnatie Tyre Comeany. Mr. W. D. Benton appeared for the defendant Mr.

J. TV. M'Carthv for the claintiffs. 17KD TSTlcs smith ssia was in nis opioion the appeal oupht to be allowed. The defendant rrrietrd a elsjm for calls on shares in the rlalntiff cororsnv on the pro end that be had been deceived by the use of the Lmnlcp srpeartns on a prospectu as part cf the rempeny't name, lie thought that ther was a question proper to tubmitted to a jury, and that Mr.

Justice Dty had been wrong in allowinr the plaintiffs to sign judgment. There would, thenfore, be leave to aeiena. Loud Jrsncn.lliaBr and Couxss conrorrtd. HIGH COURT OP JUSTICE. QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION.

(tlfore the Lojsd Cnirr Jcsncx and a SperM Jury.) rosTBia T. II ITT TUX In this action the plaintiff. Bene Martin Fortrit, a French naval oficer, claimed damage from Sir John Button for an alleged slander. The statement of claim alleged that on July 10, 1898, the defendant falsely and maliciously spoke and pouuhed of the plaintiff the following word to Lord Monktwell Fortrit baa been perreeetine my oaugoier who most unwelcome addresses for two year and it wu alleged that thereby the plaintiff had been injured in his reputation and had lost the hotpitallty of Kir Frederick Pollock and Air. Jccn ivorbury.

sir jonn iiuttoa in cis ueienre said tnst if the words were spoken at all ther were spoken without malice and oa a privileged cession. The plaintiff had obtained from Lord Monktwell and lorwaraea to me ceicnaant a letter introducing me plaintiff to the defendant, and the defendant spoke the worat complained oi in tiie course gi an explanation to Lord Xlonkraell whv he could not accent and act on the letter of Introduction. It was fcrtber contended that the statement of claim disclosed no cause cf action there' being' no (pedal damage shown, and that the worat in epiestion were true in tuntaoce ana isci. Tha rdajntiff snresred in Tierson and Mr. Cock Q.C., Mr.

B. G. Glenn, and Mr. Cecil Barringten were counsel for the defendant. Before the iurr was tworn the Lose CBiir JCSTICX aaxea ice piamiui woetaer ce wouia use so cave Mine to take advice before the case was opened in Court.

The plaintiff, however, declined and said nothing would satisfy him except an apology from Sir John Mutton. Mr. CoCK ttid thtt in the circumttaneei of the cate thi wa quite impossible. The ease therefore Ttroceeded. imperfectly understood, proceeded to open his case.

At far aa could be gatkered, it appeared that tbe plaintiff had anked Eir Frederick Pollock to ottaia an introduction fer bici to the Hutton family, and that Eir Frederick Pollock had asked Lord Monktwell to write a letter of introduction. Lord Monktwell did so. and afterwards was called cn by Kir John Dutton, who explained to him that he could not aet on th introduction riven, as the plaintiff had been for two rear persecuting his daughter. It also appeared that 8ir Frederick rolloeK naa peoposea we piainim tor election at tbe London rcneing cioo.dui, in consequence oi wnai besnt with rerard to thi matter, the plaintiff name was postponed pending ineruirirt.and the plaintiff alleged he had thereby" lost the hospitality of Sir F. PoUock.

The plaintiff proceeded to read a large number cf letters, ana went iuwj inrittun tv. Witness called wa Ladr Button, wife of the defendant. wa examined at greet length. Her evidence to the effect that the plaintiff pestered th family with letter, nd tent Bowers and other present to Ber oaugraer. cjkj bw ii" 4 It arTxared also that the tlain tiff wrote to on of the servant ia the boose to make inmiru abont tbe Uotton cnaer uie bum The Loed Cnirr Jrrncs (to plnintifn.

Toor nam cm the record i Form, ion (ignea The liaintlff (aid bit ntma wa Bene Martin Fortrit nanta of Martian Tbe Lobd CHir Jcaitci. Ibe jury will appreciate your use of that (Effort Mb. Jcsticb Kisxedt eiiti a petal Jury.) XJJtKS V. TBOOUT AND OTT1EE3. Ia thi action Iiarry Marks, a tailor, living at HemI riempstead, and a private in the Company of the 2nd volunteer Battalion of the Bedfordshire Bcgiment, claimed damagta from Frederick Progley, superintendent ot the Hertfordshire Police, stationed at Hercel llcmpctead, Arthur Cooper, a tergtant, and Thoma Lovelock and George Short, 'priratet in Company ot th 2nd Volunteer Battalion Bedforuthire Regiment, for assault, wrongful arrest, and false imprisonment The defendant Cooper, Short, and Lovelock in their defence denied the aatsolt and pleaded that at the time of the act complained ottheyane) the plaintiff were subject to military law and tbe plaintiff had been charged with larceny, aa offence punishable under the Army Act, and they kept the plaintiff in custody in the course of their military duty.

The defendant Frogley pleaded that in the course of bit doty a a police officer he took the plaintiff into custody and locked bun np cntil he could be taken oezore a magistrate. Mr. Tassell smeared for the plaintiff Mr. Lawson Walton, Q.C., and Mr. Muir were for the defendant Cooper, Lovloek, and Short and Mr.

Joseph Walton, Q.C., aod lir. Dsnckwerts represented the defendant Frogley. The eimrmatanoe which rare rise to this action were a follow i Early ia August, ltSlC, the: 2nd Volunteer lUtlalion of tha Bedfordshire. Megimatit, brigaded with Ueguiar zorcea, wa unatrgoing Its tranuog at Shorn elille. The camo broke up cn the 8th of Auenst Mark occupied a tent, with several and appeared for come reason or other to have made him till unpopular.

Early on the morning of the 8th 'of August aiaras naa ut leave nis tent ter fatigue duty, aal before he left' there wt om dispute about the lot of some articles belonging to the other men. He had packed up hit kit and declined to unpack it. On returning to his tent an hour or two later be found ut content oi His baggage scattered about the tent aod an excited crowd gaumed together outsiae. iio wss men xoia uas certain articles, ttrosoes, a towel, handkerchief. had been found in his kit, and he was accused of stealing them, lie wss hooted sud snouted at, aod the adjutant.

Captain Foote, en being told what had happened, ordered Marks to go with him, a the Guards were going down to the station aad the camp wat breaking up. When be arrived at tbe ttatiem be wa riven into tha charce1 of the defendant Cooper, who received order to take him to tlcmeiliempsteaa unaer escort ana were nana blm over to tbe mil cooper (elected Short and Lovelock a escort, and took the plaintiff to Ileeuel Betnpetotd and on arriving there marched him off to tha police, station and gave him into the custody ot Superintendent Frogley. Mark' rill and belt were then taken away from him, but be denied that any charge wat made against him. Superintendent Frogley then locked him up, and he wat kept in the cell from Eatorday to Monday morning, the reason given for this by Frogley being that on the Catorday there was a garden party at liatfleld in honour of Li Bong Chang, and all th local niari strates were attending it. bubscaoenUr be wa brcmcn before the Ilemel Hempstead magistrates and remanded on bail.

Ultimately a warrant wat taken out from Hytbe, and the plaintiff waa again arretted and cam mitted for trial at the Canterbury Quarter Seationt on tbe cnarge ol larceny, wnen ne wat acquitted, inere wa no (uggcttion now that the plaintiff had committed a crime. The plaintiff having given evidence in support of hit case, Mr.Lawsox WALTOX.Q.C.. contended, for the defen dant Cooper, Short, and Lovelock, that all they did with regard to tbe' plaistiS they did at the command of a rrulitsry superior, and that wa a command they wre bound to carry out. Though the military defendant ware volunteers, at ice time in question tney were bricaded with Regular force for their training, and were subject to military law. Captain Foote.the adjutant, ordered the plaintiff to be taken into custody in order that he might be handed over to the civil authority for the matter ta be ieauired into.

Captain Foote took that course, as ho was entitled to Go, unaer toe Army act, iooi, ana ne eurcctea. cooper to provide an escort ana to to uemei iicmpsxeaa ana were lo.iaxo mm uj uie pouce staiion, Mr. Dasckwebtb. for Superintendent frcclev. con tended that he was bound to take and retain the accused in custody cntil he coold be brought before a magistrate a ne rtatonaDiy suspectea nun oi caving commuici felony.

Evidence wst riven on behalf of the defendants. Cartain Foote detailed tbe rircumstanctt in which gave tbe order for the plaintiff to be taken under escort to iiercei uempneaa. Cross examined. Tbe pltintiff might have been tried bv Court martial, but it would have been Terr inconvenient, at toe camp baa troKen up. tie could not have banded tbe man over to the police at Sborncliffe at there wat not time.

Serretnt Coo per. one of the de fendtnt. (aid he received orders to take the plaintiff under eseort to Ilemel Hempstead, and there to hand him over to tbe police and prefer a charge of theft against him. lie telected as escort the two men on the left flank of the HmTiT. and thev hammed to be Short and Lovelock.

un arrival at ixixmoor siauoa viukh wu uiucb, rink, snd he dismissed all the company except those be reauired to march to the police tt alien. He left Marks in rasuidv fix frofiev. it, Mr. Jmmt YVat.tty O.C. He told Frozley he V.rV, than, bv order of the adtutant.

IXiu niniiud bv Air. rroKiev rcmaraeu about the matter having occurred at rihoricliffe, aad tbougct it ougnt to nave oeen aeait wiu mere. The other aefcndanU Lovelock and Short alio" gave avMAnea. The defendant Fredenek Frogley, snpermtenaent Af nolira at TTemel Hempstead, said that he knew nothing about the matter until brought uarxt to tne police staiiw uu Ki mklnr thines out of tent at Sborn cliffe, and that he tCooperlliad been ordered to bring him there. Witness replied that he ought to bare been left at Sborncliffe.

After be bad heard what the witnesses K. r.s Minanlt tha TnasHstrates clerk. He afterwards charged Marks with ttealing and took bun into cuitody, uunaing tnat lucre wmm nw rroi.nd for rotirlodine Mark had committed a felony. That wa on Saturday afternoon but there was no local justice at bom. He took bin aa ooa a ba could on the Monday mormnr before a xoagistrate.

Mm. Justtcx KrrsxDT, in snxoming up to tbe jay. asked them say what ixamage the pUinUff bac v. k.na Hoooer. lavreloek and Short, upon tbe assumption that Captaja Footo rv the order that be should be taken to the pclice staticn, and that toco, order vii not juninea in aw.

wegva latesdect Frogley thelaw bad been laid down by Bsron BmmweU ia the ease ot Hogg r. (S H. and iV a this mea with that is a reasonable groosd, and th coostallo ouxht to take the person charged into Custody. But if front circumstance it appears to be aa oaf oonded charge tha ecaaiabla it not only not hound to act upon it, but he is revponiiU for so doing. Tha quettton wu, Wa Frogley to takme; th ehtrgt exercising reason bl car to aacerUin th facto before Uking tha ptaiaun into custody Uid aooeeUy believe tbat there were ground of nupeetiug biaa of felony: jury aaseaaeu toe aaisegef at auv, cpa aue Itumrtion that tha srmt wu nnt hitliitd in law.

Tbry also found that fleperiutendent Frogley took reasonable care to aseertaia th; facte before taking tha plaintiff into cuitody, and that be honestly believed that there were ground foe upet ibj him of having committed a felony. They addd that they thought Frogley acted with unnecesary berth ace in not communicating with the plaintiff' parent. Mb. JciTirx Kbmidt gave Tadgment for the defendant Frogley. with eorU.

With regard to toe question aa to whether th reciainms; deXtudant were irgauy )utiicei in acting a they eUJ tbe case wit adjourned Tor further raaeiderxtioa. (Ctare Ma Jumcs Dabxcco uf a Counum Jurf.) OILtT T. WILtTJ ASt OTDX23. Thit wat an action for libel asointt tie printer and poUishers of the Sovlh London CknitU. Tbe defend ants pleaded that the libel wrt published without malice or negligence, and that a full apology wa afirr ard incertwl in the paper.4 Mr.

Candy, Q.C., and Mr. Arthur May were for the plaintiff Mr. F. Sbewa Copper appeared for the Before the tleadinrs were opened Mr. Catdt.

Q.C.. called hit Lordship' attention to paragraph 2 of the defence. Without reading the paragrtph in question counsel stated that: the practice was not quite settled; The Lord Chief Justice took one course and other Judge had. taken another. Mr.

Jmici Damcea, havinr' retired to consult the Lord Chief Juttice on ths point, returned into Court nd till tlfst in the rase referred to th pleading were not in the tame eon lit urn as hre. Mr. Cooper ald that from ths report fa TU Titut he thought they were. Mr. Mar: It was reported in Tie Timei of July 31, 1835.

The Jctjca I think thtt paragraph 3 should not be opened to the jury. It appeared from counsel' opening statement that the aetion arose oat of a report which appeared in the defendants' paper on January 23 sn.1 comment upon the report. On Docembrr 7 two Armenian going to a Salvation Army shelter in lrmbndiey were set upon uj ivfugu Bui lenoicuj mjuriHi. ice was brought before a mairsto and charjed with causing one of them, named Krikcrian, grievous bodily harm, and was remaoded on bail. Knkorisn then died, and at the inquest the coroner's jury exonerated Oxley, and returned a verdict of manslaughter other perrons.

Oxley, when brought before the magistrate again, was uisenargea witn tne statement tnere was nothinff uraicst him. The libels were in a report cf the inquest, stating that the jury found a vtrdict ot manslaughter against ths plsiutij, and in a note.whicb repeated the ttatement in the leport and added that the magistrate had discharged htm with Homing against mm. Thomas E. Crocker, solicitor, stated that he represented the Plaintiff at tha police court, where ho wu charged with rausiDg grievous bodily harm tnd was re manuea on iau. Altcrwards ne was djriiiLrred.

He was cover charge! with manslaughter. Witness was present at me ir.qorst on tne body or Tbe jury rxoDcrated Oxley, and returned a verdict of manslaughter against othir persons. Crofti examined. The paper was a weekly one. In nis erst letter be sited lor tbe name ot defendant solicitors.

He did not ask for an apology. ilr. uoorER. it not your custom the first 1 1 1 1. vi.

aii k. Tx that if a person Tna vj.ia.iiv in reaa a icuer wucu miwm 1 1 in whirh ha aakL if txmld ttdjt Brttitlfl I fTWUtdt fl tmjV JtSKmaKMrr. instance to ask for an anoloiry Mb. Justice Daeli.no. That depends on whether you are afraid they may offer one.

(Loubter.) The plaintiff Au E. Oxley, gave corroborative evidence. Cross examined. Before he beeame a earman be wa a (kin dresser. The JCDGr.

Every one is in Witness ecnthaainiri said that ths anolorv waa etot enough, a hi fellow workmen kept chailuighin about It. Mr. CoorEB. in addressinr the rurv for tha defenea. laid that the defendant had made an error in tbe report, hut they had published a full apology in the next issue.

Ah apology wat not. however, what the plaintiff wanted. air. jcser.n otaunton, mo eaiierr.saia uu ne preparea the report of the inquest from other papers, except tbe last three lines, in which occurred the statement that a verdict of manslaughter waa returned against tbe Those three lines were a summary made by tbe sub editor from the daily papers. Tha comment complained of wa written by ium also.

An apology wt toMequenuy puoiisaea. Mn. JosTicx in suramin: up to the farv, said that under a rperial Act of Parliament newspaper appointed Mr. Edward Hebbs. ebartered aeeouataat.

trustee of the estate, with committee of inspection. PBOniTK, DIT0BCSJC5D ADMIRaLtT DITlSlOS. Btfort Ot Tiwirr Hot, tU Pustpxtt.) cr nrx coon or jomr uxor otrrra c20xx rtKjM, ruscMzo pxczm. Mr. said that Br.

WTTVna aa marriad (a lSW. and lived OH matt with tiia arifa and family down to Angust 14, 1890, when be die awsaevu. ta wuaiaesa as mercaant ra we glass trade, and bad liii become bankrupt. Whew be left hi house he said good bye ta hi ehiViren, al the sane dsy his wife received tbe following post card from him Dear Milly, If 1 as net home by do not wait op for ma as I bar to xo into tha euuutiy oa busiaest. Yours, J.

Tbe next day tha son received U10 follow mg letter Leanng the Lcrnloa postmark IIt desr Pon. I feel that I cannot endure anv more worry, in fact 1 am nearly mad with worry. When you receive this I shall be gone, but be a good boy and eheeryour mother ami lock after tha Utile one. Trust in God and you will tnj things come right. I save only pas wia tnai is, wat yoo do not go to tbe expense of one penny for mcrcraiag for me, and that you wBl all live united together, ami do tbe best yoo can far your mother cannot write any more a I I art wild and resiles that 1 cannot contain myself.

I can't tell you low I feel. Good bye. God hie ad protect yoo all. Lot to yoo all. a okt uctuawa uurr, Elaekfriara bridre." J.

WilKCTS. Tbe wife thereupon communieated with the. police, and an application was also made to tha maristrate at the Marjitbone Police court, aod report of the application were inserted in aetrral newspapers. Advertisement were also inserted in 2 Me 1 jut, xae irar ry, 1 it Dili, and JVW CaXBt durinstb years lS'Jl 3. but no answer bad been reeeivol, nor bad the deceawd since been beard of.

By his will, dated March 11, 18o7, the deceased ppolated bis wile executrix and Mr. Crrer executor of his will. His life wa insured for 1,000 with tha London Life Association (Limited), who did not oppose tbe present application, although they stated that tney did not eoniider themselree ia any way bound or it. The PBEsrDEXT. after reading tbe affidavit, rave leave to (wear the deaia on or since August 14, LAW NOTICES, Xov.

18. KOtTE oriOEDS. Wemenrrrsa lt 13 Cajea dcoiao Uadatv Oo. v. ttolheltaad er Wareics lfa.tlT hearlV ttaramor and Co.

tha Usnk of IrsliaJv. XUana laaariatr Lori nsirenoa AucraevHiaasm iceuiaxv rrrntriAr. committes or the feivt rjotrscn. WimiiiL 30 Apvasls. IaU artia Dt v.

laia Emoar3iBiMr saa au.tr, v. aiaeer. rrftciiccotrsTor judicittjee. rjomrror appxal. Mon Hum or tu Kotxa.

low jcmci hit. aa Loan Jcsnrs Vacant ruuw la Coart Xa. lu 30 tram ti Cbaaraey PrXsiaa ITUtl laul Ka aa ArbitesticB teuaa MaHra. Adala KMcbart aad Co. and Manra.

Ooakftoa Uros. sad Arbkratioa AcC 1SS3. art baarO Ssandars T. Ilaro lt Koew IKafnrs t. lain I.

Isaeae ttoao Jurrica A. I Emm. Ioeo Jvmct Kiost. aad Luas Jewries riu.fss, hi Oert Ma. si 10 SO Av't rrom tbe ifnmtn't linae (t iaal JatL AttnraaT Utwnl v.

Tb lark BmnVl to. uiiLFtaa aar.ran aaari tfnewooa aaa uo. v. s.raal(ls. Awraal rrm tha Clisaearv Divlalon (1.1 LiaeLBata ConttauM Ail 1X3 te llM, sod la rs TLe Crewa Lsaia IjCTMHai7 Ca.

iLtd.) (in iiia.anjrj. man covxt or jrTicx. Dirntos. VM ir I It Hnn N'oRTM. aft 13 XI I trial tatih aitaawasl Uaarj and Co.

iLtLi TnUcisa UA 1.1. part brara tiasn aaa lu. I iTan siars. Ttix ujes, a ran Mara. AdJaarBsd SsaiaMiee.l: Vreemaa (liiaaad v.

evrak part baant Ka Keeiroa and Caatnker sad V. sad 1. Act, lf74 Ra Toaa baed (1 raar.tirt rtarravl Dar v. Kaliaod Ka Tsibot IBraati? la v. laiDotj il.fwuaa i (Inn v.

Eat Ra Usnencl Kjt IMIrtra t. Kaarlaki. at 13 39 CaiuM lor Trial (vita Uiauu). Uill v. Tan oar eiold Insv.

OeOlj. Cocbt IV. rfar a. Jrnnca Kxkxwich. At IS 33 Tor hidirroent.

Pacrt v. rr Aiilaan v. Jeoe. fjaasas tor trial (wuauat a ituwant Maddaes v. iOankaead Lao4oa aad Oiob Fan Vlaaaclal aad Mlaln Onrwrum ILuLi AdJowl naaM lto Dakin (lakla v.

iiaunr ua ueisbtoa saa nuns saa saa r. Act, mi rs HanlevlUlolo. UMrrL Col aT IJ. liarara tla. Jrrncs Komi Al X) CnM tar trial IwiLh raeaMSL BaUsbartli v.

IVrtv aad Co. IUd.1 Baias iru and anouer v. rwrr aaa lx lua rvrri tea vo. uu f. narBKata.

consenifiaian, ran osara. Cucav 11L llciura bla. JtiSTiea Brasa. at 13 33 Caaea for TriaL srHb witiMaaM. Pare v.

fobs aba J. Lmi aad aaos v. WUkuu. J. WfcaeajFS ia 'lsas aad Baa Wul DMKlMl omntL Hiram 0.1tl Raf.f i fwrta.

lirtisal Hiawt. lBa. CojiI No. Caiera Jla.Vsslt. al 19 33 taller sad lillar LiTsool Palace or VarlaCMa.

Court 5a. IX tXar Ma. Uaxxiss. y.C Alio J3 flm Urban Duavt OuU Mmv utn f. scrms.

taon iii uaura aar9UMci. At 13 a Wloatr v. CafJft, part baaed. tEJSCH DITTMOX. rcar VII Drrntios tL Oovst.

BaTore Ma. Jcsvica waiairn gawarallr. Urttr, ai pane tutu v. Cetbr.s Bsgss. ex parts Sesaa v.

Start tHaKb Cam ex part Ham v. Joaan raw, tx paria Faraa t. Pnvta KaaM. as parte sta v. sain wa.

as parra if elf Call, barta Bacott at Sasiatnr Aahaia. aa una taUa v. af Ttala Ur Jsvmsa. at parts Uaalnek v. Sanaa nrtBtwons, pane laoaaa stawiss, ss pane uasiai wnr KaaL' Loan Cnirr Jemcri Com.

Befne th Loan Carer Jewries or ienLlSD. It 10 S) at Kldlaaes Action. Kpaoial Jade. WalKn Urbae DtUriet Ceuneal v. tekaba.

part baard w.ns at Aw erutaaf ucMur aad stbers v. vatj ana boo W.Ik.. Tfl TM.alla. Ismdam eimafc, CnaanO. I'ot'lT 1T Bafora bla.

Jorm HiTIir. at 13 XI MltLEam rAetioaa fractal Jurtoa. Crirl and WU v. BanaH E. Bw naa aad i.

tlAd.) v. Farjnr wataraoaM tiaorra'a Boo nasrlnv t. ILsiLV rradrrleks v. North MatroixUUaa Tramaara Ca. OooST IV Hfor M.

Jcmcs KsaasnT. aet bator It ieaJanaa. wouUsa v. lisapa ana aaatbar Sam epwuaaa pUBUSOLD by THS T1MM VTO. VOL.

I. (SATUBDAT. OTKKBmil. IUTJ rTTITE FOURTH STJilBEE of LTTIKA.TTJSS' JL Tcnr zxast. bed.

a defence which, would not be open to ordinary people in a iioei action, uvy puutsaea vu iioei witrt 'rcaJie)trand wiltouTrfghgericB, and it they inserted a full apology, they were entitled to a verdict. It wa not mi rested that there wa any malice, but it would be difficult, though possible, tor them to ssy that there bad been no negligence in the publication of tbe libel, lire only damage, however, to the plaintiff of wmcn tnere was any eviocnce wa aim icuow wora men had chaffed him for not baring killed aa Armenian. Tbe jury found a verdict or tbe puustui lor 19. Mr. Cajcot asked for judgment.

Ilis LoarjuTar aasented. Mr. CoorKB said that, as tha defendants bad raid 5 into Court, thev were entitled to the costs of tha action. (This, payment' into Court wa tbe plea contained in pvtgraph 2 of tha defence. Mb.

Justice1 DAiiUSO said that nothing interested him less than a question of costs. lie understood that upon tbe verdict and judgment aa given tbe plaintiff would obtain costs. Be thought that fair, and ha would therefore leave the matter where it was. Mr. OiXr then formally airpted for fudrment for the defendant, but hi Lourvii'ir declined to accede to tha application.

At a later Denod in too day the learned JuDce sent for the counsel wbo had loco engaged in the case, and, addressing Mr. Candy, raid that be had rince discovered a case that be did cot know of before, lie wa going to put a question to the jury. Air. Uania iieiore your Lrfrasnip does tbat, might I say ttat you and the jury bare disposed of tha ease 7 Tbe JCI GI. I have given a direction that my judgment should not be recorded.

(To tha jury.) Gentlemen, there is no' suggestion of malice, so I suppose I mar take it. that you find that there wa no tualiea. Then do you nd that there wa grau negligence in putting too libels in tne paper, ana ao you tnd that tbe apology wa not a iuu one The jury were understood to reply to these eruestiona ia the affirmative. Mb. Jcsticb UaeliSO aaid that the caae to which he referred wa Best t.

Osborne and Co. (12 Tk4 TinKI Law Report, p. 419). In the case ot a libel action against an individual where there wis payment into Court, the defendant had only one condition in satisfy in order to obtain judgment. But in the ease ot a libel action against a newspaper there were, under Lord Campbell'! Act, several condition.

A they had not all been satisfied, he must give judgment for the plaintiff. He saw tbat the of not mentioning the amount of money paid into Court wa a great one. and be pretumea tost some iour wouia nave to whether this role (Rule 22, Order 22) applied to plea under Lord Campbell' Art, 6 and 7 c. 96. Mr.

CaspT. The ease of William v. Goose (1897, 1 Q.B., 473) shows that the rule it cot ullra rirtl. The Jrrxix. It dees not follow that the Court would hold tbat it applied to action where the defence given bv Lord ami, bell Act is pleaded.

Hut I feel bound to act a if it did apply. 1 must give judgment for the Slaintiff because the whale of tbe plea which i a efence under tbe Act ha not been proved. I say nothing about costs, leaving them to the ordinary rule. A stay of execution lor it aayt.waa granted with a view to an appeal. (Stliingt in Bankruptcy, lefare Ma.

KlGlSTSAB L1XKLATZ2). WRISTUABT. A ws rerentlv mesenteri ar Stuart, described as an ofScer in her Majesty' Navy, now serving in U.M.S. Doris, ttstioned. at Deronport.

The petitioning creditor wt Mr. George neath, the trustee undtr the bankruptcy of Measrs. liallatt and bankers. Cnon tbe application of Ulesxrt. Kootier and Whatelr, solicitors, lii U050CH now made tbe usual receiving order.

I3T BE ZLT0X. With reference to the matter of Henrr Robert nim. which is noticed in Ta Timet of to day, an order ha Deen maae lurur au lartaer croeeeaines nndee tha receiving order until the 19th and appointing aa application for the rescission ot the receiving order to pe neara on ua aaizw aay. XBtfore M. A.

H. Wildt, Official Eeetirer.) IS EI TOltSCHITX. A tneetinr of creditors waa haM Hu f.ilnn of Ferry Tomscbits. described as an emnrt carrying on buainee at S8, Leadrnhall street: E.C. It appears uutb uw urutur was eurector of ixiui Tusvaud's Exhibition (Limited).

The lisbJitie are retumea at tn.tzz, of which 3.943 are exDected to rankr, with asset The debtor ascribes hi insolvency to losses ia eoxtnexien with tha rt hi hi lion. and to other cause. An adjudication of wnkroptcy having already been made, the creditor decided to leave the matter in ths band of tne umoai Keeeiver aa trustee. IS KX SAJTDX31S. This wss a tint meeting of creditor under a receiving order made in the case ot Herbert Edwin Pander.

It appear that, previously to May last, tbe debtor carried on business as a wholesale provision merchant, at 22, Southwark ttreet, S.E., under the style of Bander and Co. Ia tbat month be called hit creditor together and offered them a eompociticn of 4. ia the pound, but, being unable to pay thi. he filed hi petition. Tbe liabilities are eatimated at about 10,000.

with aaset 5S0. The debtor attribute hi failure to liabilities on accommodation bill which he baa been called npoa to xoeet." Meatrt. Ward, Perk, tad M'Kty arsjeared or tbe Ho exedjaaJjOnarwict. J. TIZRJLTUIiX." DITZD by HV V.

TKAIT.L. I RICE SIXPKXCK. Rcxirtered a a Xtrrpapcr. jOSTiaiTS cf So. aAAjluit Attlll lil la iwasia tn nmsr riox.

Aiiosa jrr nooxa. Br rcorxssos icasajtt. KZTUWa ti BEowTrcrcrs ixttxea. the BAJtrrcrx IXCTCKBL kUAUSAStcX AJtCBlTsVlUJUl Ef T5QtA5TJ. rtVAxcz uyDix locu xt.

i IAKW1X A5D AITXK DAJlwTS' CEXXCX IX THX XIX. CtSTVXX. BTOBIXS or 'AXOT3 80903. THE COSi'OlSSECK. ixstrjr, BOCIAL.

WlTmi.TD. HISTOET Or DeXiUA. TSXATISX T5 tiXCTXTlCXTlOTl. 8TOKT 07 OUZ KStGLISH TOW3S. atrLTTABT KICHAJtS BAIXA tXITH COLD STXEAX aVAZIM VX THE CZttfEA CXA.

El WAiTIXC MUtcjUr osiont or DMtiAr rxACTTnoixsr handbook xxdicai. nam roa hot cunxTza. LrGAL EETIitD BXTOST fJOODETI OS Ffi rorxRTT or rtxADisQ alb Or OOOlyLLXJT)tjrm03tUSlOS9 AT SKA. ncnos: THC KlXva WITH TWO TACXS LVWXDCX THB afAXISO or A rXIO AXT nxiAXi kxxg rax. OAiixT or HESKY MramrTw THE TWO CATTAUS THJt BTTS BXDEJITTIOX A STAXIsa MAlD AW ATTtO Cf BO Hilt IA THE VJCAS or ULXGTn WAITS THE BETTLX BLACTs or TUX (TTWTOTXY TH SUrorjl OT MAKI.T A aUXCB OX LOXIroa WIia KOOEJt at coarxsA.

CHILD KET KXJX IOiXATDICrllZTTAlJri, gut rsiur rExxcirs unm AT THE BOOESTAU. CORBXSrOSOXSCZ SUQTAXO XTTLCTO LOBD TXXXTEOS. roExiGs ixrrxss THZ ljuid ititxs CrjULaXT. OCTTUAXT flfX KCTHESrOED XUDOCX SXZSOV. a b.

cArXtcAssux. woTxa. ujt or anv books ajd bxtbxsts. 1 O.taata and Co. (ll HUrT and othara BaUaaaabaT v.

Aaau starmiiau v. KieuMMt. jgaev aula at uaaa uf hm t.taa la aarahar frnttl tn il.T cjorsr vilL iMtor sea. jdrrn, rails, 10 JO ctn. aaaia Jbaa.

T. Jaw Baas aart bate aV TV. and H. Bharaa and aamhar v. T.

WUaca. kona. aad Ca. (Lai.) aua v. arariaui.

aaroo. aaa UttCBT DaLra.alIH MlrtrTUawt lotioni. Ccmmoa Jsrie. Dasaitr v. WooOaf and Oo.

part aaard Laranala aad 8 V. Jaeada rrjor v. ataltar rnuaer aonci racut la atad lo 13 aa dtnatad by tbeir aa: rKOBATE, srroEcx, axd admirai.tt crrui ox. Cocbt f. Bafar tha Biaar Hon.

Bra raaacn HJstnra. rissi pat, atllJU fncin jana. uaaas aoa taataar v. aaaawr sea lotbar Lnrk sad aaotaer v. Williams snd staars Cod v.

Oseda. iUiar. aadHavitt. Oiuar 11. Brr ala.

Jtnmca Coazu. Buna at 10 X) Admiraltr. Tsa (Wiiitw. ijomv aaa eaas aaa Ji eta' Venn II. Efer Mb.

Kaeumtsa Lj turiLAl 11 ean kCB sad Wa'IaoaL dboharra fc( H.II H. Bcacaaat At 1199 BvfUace. a imUia atMtlaaTinn Traiaan, JH ditta Von Grabvu. ditta Tnoar, dluo. At 12 Tonw hlia, aaa mto Tartar, ouaa.

ia tjaaaiDar Jtoook Lfnf. CKftTki. RUDHB1IL At 11 1 HAakraMC Motir. adjesmed itrilssneB. ai (jsrt.

vriw mum. Ia Cbaratars Boesi 36. Before ata. Smcrnua Ufitsbov At 11 Adjounwd stpUratlOB diUo A phclian ta pMitana As 11 39 rear ditto. Ai 12 i htm ditto.

At U39 Tbm ditto. At 2 Om aluo nf tam lauoa iif. CaxrASlsalWtBOiaaUrL Uaarap(e7 W.G. Baton Us. BtaisTaiB la Chambers.

At 10 50 Mulclvn luvua TrvnrlLer (Ltd. I. In Ctar.Oomrt I. 11 to 4 Watt Anatraltaii CrUtrVtl Tradia I'orporauoa (Lull, aubUs aaaaUaatiea cf LslIs Bsojv Ooedmss. Mr Edvtrd Lee.

Major GMrsl A. TaUoaB In taiamrwa avaa ta, a ilt (U4.L Hoc in tv. al II XI rai tuaadara ranaasant i aaa at Bauaia Q05TEXT3 of So. uasuu asiit.i iBs aruavuiAxuui or Tarn XOTXL. AMOSO MT BOOKS." BT US MaCLAXXX.

XXT1XWS lux or zowasx bouveuie mn. THX rOXTKT or BCX53. OlOEOE MEXXDITirB FOXaTX. AUT0U0GBA1HT Or A VXTXXUf. Goetur rxoM a MfnfistxaT book tub watxs or tub woxdboub fir.n ENGLISH BXXXOiCTIXKi.

HUTOLSX COXTXXroXAETX LX UlSXVtCU trOBIXR. rmLoeoPHT or lurowxxrxix LITE Of KXDTXIOX FOBTXa. XXOLUB CHCBCH HISTOXT. CHIXXSX CHAXACTXXIaTICS AXD THX CUT OT JATAH. EHAKXXrXAEX.

rUiTIJJM AX9 XXtUXAXT. XOMAXCX or THX IXttH STAOX a rsixxx or woxoowostb. UKJAie MAO xwrxxxT OX 1TJXX8 HTXTXX 1 EOXAX LAW. ncnoxt CAFTAIXB COTJ1AGZOC. LOCHI5TAX.

OXX or THX BXOtXX BXIOaDX," CXXXUCTB Br A HAIBTS BaXADrrl CLAPIfli DUVAL or XrXXTT FIVE LADT BOSALWD. lOZAOrlJtJUXTH BXOXXXAKlTHXTXXia or TOLLT GEOEflX MALOOLK A fltETT. Ol IRISH STOXIES TBX VALL or THX VAXXOV. CREX rOSDEXCX THX SOTXL HISTOXICaL AOCCBACT. roKxiax ixxri3 raAxcx EUMiA TxrcrxD BTATXft.

OBITTABT THX CCCHXSS Or TXCX HXXBT CEORflE TEXT EXT. JAKXS BTXXX BX. rrouumux xxT. T. x.

bxows. BOTE. BIELIOa BATHT sriaxxiA. un or BOO EX AXD xxnuxTfl. ITXRA.TTJBX.' iwrer lia 'Kuurraaa Hood.

1b Ctambrrm. kooa, C3, aa L2 KnalUh raWabinr Co. (Ltd.) nts v. EarJiib Publiallta LHUT Bmaa 67. ui 15 rptow Bra, v.

Wdrv, Haepar. aad Ce. (Ud Boobi S3, at It 3) Wsbe v. Hans, Yam. aad Cordan (Cover t.

WaM Isdiaa aad Brliiaa Uniaaa loa Co, Lui.1 elmcilL lut'tiesx Boai or TaansL Msmsos or srd roa. Befer lb Omctal. Kscsrrss. At Baakro cr buidiia, Cknv craet. luiea U.

nrat Owe. at 11 CaU. Sir W. staatia af retociMl ervdnora. AI 12 nanaaa.

A. Crat tai eu. 1 loom 73, taeoad Boor. At Lravar, T. first mattac At I Onna, aaa Lax.

iita aiisi muiar. a. u. em nmntL Rarcivva om aaraa fWneri I7n a wnina st 31, Canr atnat. W.C.

At 1 ob Atrnaa. Aastnliaa. aad ejar aral rinane Corseratiea (Ltd.a adjouraad aaprinosaat te teuie tM Ian ol rinMiwm LOKl BtAYOB'n COl'UT, GCIIDBAU, aa IS J) Canaa ttn.c Inrtd v. Tboraa Mane tha 90 Sin SavaioDSMal rvadlct (Ltd.) Haaktna t. sarv Orimtb Wtlliatas laaar yl v.

Bbort 1aaaoa Bdaaa JmtM v. Hsaapaca PUkinitoo v. BoanrvtaUa Bars. Mat aad Co. Owa Dor v.

UrWie TTaaaall CtcM and Tab v.O UmlL If aaatactwia CoaapaarlUd.) COCVTT or tASVOS EES3I0.V3. At tb BsaeioiK aocss. Ctevtaonll, at 10 il CruBisal caaaa aruia aseta ta Thaniia. The SIcxicirAuzAiiox or Loxrxw. The Veetrie of Hammersmith and St.

Fan era have resolved to join with other important perishee in a memorial to the Government praying them to introduce a Bill in the next Session of farlianMnt to provide for the creation of metropolitan municipalitiea of dignity and importance, and to confer upon them tbe right to undertake and perfonn municipal dutiet ia their respective sdmratstratrve area. PorrrET Show at thb Cbtxtal Paxacx. The show of poultry, pigeons, and rabbits, which is annually held at the Crystal Paltee, wat opened yeaterday. Thi year' which is described a the Diamond Jubilee Show, outrival all it predecessors. Br those beat competent to judge it sua so do we largest show of the kind ever held.

The available floor space of tbe ralace ba been severely taxed to provide room for tbe pen. There are in all upwards oi 7,000 eartrie, an increase of icor than 850 over last year' (how. Comparing the thow with that held 10 year ago. poultry snow an increase ot aoj eutrm, acta pigeons aa increaae of about 300. Rabbit, although ahowing decrease over last year, have riaea from 293 entries to 412.

Caries are not to be seta, indeed, none have been entered sine 1889. Ia tbe jmultry section, oo of tbe most remarkable feature is the scarcity of Spanish varieties, of which fanciers are rrerv vear takinr laaa notice. Tbi year were are only eagnt entne against 39 in the preceding show. Dorking, on th other band, have been growing in popularity aad make a very strong class. Mr.

C. rifkington, of Caveni, wa th moat successful exhibitor in thi class. Cochin form a heavy da, among the chief prue winners Dciug air. w. air.

uoodaU, and Mr. A. E. Ward, for Kvmoutii Bocka. Mrs.

R. de Courcey Feele and Mrs. Wilkinson were the moat successful. Mr. J.

A. Chaetham wa wall to the front ia the Leghorn eltase. Aa attractive show is made by ths Wyandotte. Mr. W.

A. Spencer. Mr. T. C.

Hear, and Mr. F. K. Spencer carrying oS moat of tbe premier honours. The classes for Bam burgh, Brahzaaa, Orpingtons, Roudanr, Minorca, and Gam were also well filled, aad produced keen competition.

Tbe bantam eiiAses are a popular as ever, aad nearly all the larger nreeas lepi rate tea xa ta anow are riproaawi aa miniature. Lady Alisgton, Meaart. T. II. and A.

Stretch, Mr. H. Aisacosgb were among the principal winner. A large number of daeks, geei. aad turkey are shown aod ia emality are wBiiwl tha average: The) turkey an stated to to th has yet exhibited at these thowt.

Kgaona ora jaB a reeora display aod exhibit no tign trflayjtoT hdi! MrB. laaac Mr.W Lnmb, Mr. other iiiitiw remaxoa opc una Q0SXZST3 oKSO. 1 1 IXADtXO AfiTTCTJC A TBACIC BPOCXML AMOXO MT BOO EX. XT AXSKXW LAX3.

xxvirvra TXXXTSOTS LlrE Hmtl XoaVaal WILLIAM BtOEXfS. GABOrXXX'a CXJaUfOXWXAZTH. THX DIAXT or XASTXX WTXXIAX CLXXCX OLEAXLVQ DT BCODHA If ELD. THX AXXOLDS. THX LOXOS 07 TH HISTOST OF CTTELLXCTTAL rjXTaTOrXEIT.

arixxjiAOxars zno asd dxaha. AMEBIC A ATD THX AaCEgJCAirS JXWISU VTJBB. mm ncnox THB AXTfAX THX IXTIalXLX fcUV. thx TOtufasrrox AxrrarxxTS cants. TATHXX AXD BOa VtAIatX THX COKXXX thx rxorLX or CLorrxuf A bass TXXMCf rXXTXTVA KEXOTAHl LXOAL LAW Of X0TQX CAXS.

KXSiCAL MAtTXSX Or aTXSICIXX JOHX HUXTXX. XAVAL LA IfAXIXX JXAXgAlXX. AT THX BOOEtTALL. gXITEtglTT LtTTXITrl OXTOXD. roxxiax Letteb uxitxd era rALaBAVX VOS WXQXLX BXOV XAUIJ OAXA XUTWrXXtITlX, THX LIBSAXr AASOCIATIOX.

XOTXS. BTBLfOOEAfHT THX X0XTH irX3T nOXTTXX. LI3T Or BOOKS. 1 Qoyrxsn ot so. it roxxt WHITE HOKXXS.

BT XCDTAXD XTTUXQ AxoxaMTBoou. bt Aconrrxx bthttt. xxview TXJXlBOXa LUX. THX W1XBXXT0XCX ATXXB. insroKT or raxxcH utxsatuxx.

araariv aimuaitv. W. BLACXWOOD AXD HI3 SOXS. rHILOBOFHT OT XXLIOIOX. BXCXXTAXDCOlOXaXCLOTEX.

LATCt TKBBXnV IIAM OX THX XXIXAat. afixox roxTs. KXXXTAXT TrxDXX THX KX9 CXXSCXXT BATTLXriXLXJS OX THXaXAXX AXT Or WAX. LXQ Ale XCUXO CASES LAW OX TOXTS XOCEXS oxxLxcnoxa. T.

IVES. what atAisix rxrtr. JKXOXX. IX XEDAXH TEXTS. HUGH WTXXX.

MAXIXTTA MAXXIAOB A WZXC OX rAMIOX rrArurro.va lccx tiib box or the czax THX DOBXISOTOX DEED XOX THX CXIXX AX THX CRTat IX AL SHEILA McLXOD THE TWI UOHT BUT 30TX3 Or A MVtlOlVOTXX. OBmJABT a GATaSCOS DXAX OT lXAXTAXr 8X2 FXTXX IX FAOX BJUOTJT. XOTXS. BIBUOaxATHT TSATAZZIAX. LIST OF XXW BOOXX.

in i es i i 8.