The Atlanta Constitution from Atlanta, Georgia • Page 2

rely. chiefly aBomtnavdl in" of ChiefJn Uc Slab and. Zocite Jostle. Bock el the so- pr bench. In their.

newYand. float the client. ft these lodges was based largely upon I the theory that aduiIlof the teotl. if moni of Jim Conley. the negro et wlt- sa.

and of C. B. Dalton. we. Improper.

The stories of Couley soil Dalton related to the all ed perversion of the defendant. The contention of the poaV 15 I fe MuwtllHbaM Coif. 28 baWa 350 Asparagus Tips I To 0e Gas Mushrsoms. 19 Pen Me Tier Prtae aa Pea. SOS Dlaiui PfMM 1 B.

le Marseeki jC 2Se CU flatavi Skriavy' 13H Bsekam Flak Cakes TH I0eHawalla. Sled Pl nppie2l fSf Hawallam Bl P1aca rlel7 lie RwaIJa Sid PI FIsepple1i. Bottle Olltff Ito 25. Battle OUve lie Vlr rl Olive on. bottle.

lie Arc tmlmam 13 Vie Today's Market Specials Dressed fans Ib IBo Portirhoui. Steak lb. 161 CASH GROCERY CO. 37 S. BROAD ST.

JiuUee. HUJU tklnapCu Ivan. pfcimTw t. In frfnffp aae nd to uie elrcnmetanee of the PBrtkDIar1D1I1' of whi he we. ac- ooaed Mi wa perfectly to intro.

to tobl conduct with women other titan the girl with whose mord rl a wa charged. Tbe opinion of the assenting Justices I brieny and ttrtelrpnt in th following paragraph of their decialona final headnote I The vidur supports th verdict. and there no abuse of' diserstion in refusing new trlavY It was also held refusal of rude. zs Roan the trl ustlce. to grant a new trial- ore ground.

of disorder to tie courtroom wa proper and furthermore that the supreme court iidnot otouneide oral expression ofth trial justice which might he rendered at the time of denial of motion for new i trial. This latter ruling related to the fomoua remark. of. Judge Roan In I which he declared liia- indedeton' to either the- guilt or innocence of Leo Frank. I fully expected the decision.

stat. ed Solicitor-General Hugh. IL. Dorsey. Prank had a fair trial and an Impar- one.

He was found KnHtyp and jeullty I believe him to be. Mad I not believed him guilty throughout the ease. I1 woftld never have prosecuted Him. I Freak to Be The solid will soon take the neo- I esaary action to- have Prank re ed. This will done at an early date.

1 have no desire to hasten gfsirs said Dorsey. I will vast no time however. I In view of the dissenting opinion of the two uprema Justices it la Relieved counsel for the defense will seek' a new i hearing before the supreme court A thorough survey of both opinions will I decide. tnthls ease thy will endeavor to have the case sent again to the supreme court. This would be their only hope.

Charges of technical failure would he the of their- second. presentation in event theyfoliow such course. To I Women's i-'i Winter Elegant Quality Desirable Styles Are Greatly Reduced Including. Hanan Shoes- Considering the unusual excellence of quality of Carlton's Shoes with the special offering and Hanans Shoes this February offering at these special prices is one deserving your test attention. Including both staple style and the smart novelties our price reductions are as listed below 650 Shoes 515 Sioo Shoes i 485 500 Shoes.

395 400 Shoe S3. 35 350 Shoes Similar Reductions in Girls' Boys' and Children's Shoes. Carlton Shoe Clothing Co. 36 Whitehall SEASON SALE. OF.

REFRIGERATORS 20 TO 25 DISCOUNT Our :1914 stock of refrigerators has just come in arid in order to. move a lot of them now and make use of the space they occupy we are offering a discount of 20 to 25 to those who will buy early. In addition to this we are offering our regular charge customers and to any others of approved credit the privilege of. not paying for their refrigerator before May 10. In other words you use box for three months before you pay for it and get it at' a special discount price.

We list below a few sizes of boxes giving ice capacity regular price and special price Stock No. Ice Capacity. Regularice. Special. No.

330. 75 lbs. No. 540100 lbs. No.

541. 150 lbs. No. 555. 200 lbs.

250 lbs. 10000. No 730. 75 lbs. 4500.

3600 740. 100 lbs. 5500. 4400 421. 60 lbs.

3500. 2800 55. 150 lbs. 4500. 3600 KING A WA CO.

trf 53 Peachtree Street 5000 3750 4400 5200 6000 8000 6500. 7500. pnrJy- tb wntlii. enter in the de Iimad instance. ar tit.

tory of orcA Ptjit it sfor tb apr i court Jd will sift the evidence of of the' three instances In which' their. clients 4 hung Inthe scales th origInal 1 the bearing 6 fore Jnds Moan I for a new trial and th bearing before the supreme 4xk an effort to find' technical points that wilt warrant its introduction to the gecernmiot supreme court. In this case it Is cald. allegations wm 1 made that Prank was deprived constitutional This isstated to be the only federal point which might- involve a case similarto to- that of Franks trial. The Frank case be tore the federal court would require months and months.

A. motion extraordinary soul4 be. road. on the gronndof newly-discovered evidence. Thiswould have to be carried before' the trial court over.

which. Judge Ben Hill presides sir. Judge Roans departure. In this In tan the case could only be forward. ed to the supreme court.

In which it met defeat Tuesday. 90 Strongest I think. that could he made la our behalf. Luther flogger said Tuesday afternoon. Is contained in the dissenting opinion of Chief Justice neb and Justice Beck.

By which It we. inferred. but tint confirmed. that the plan of action for the new light would a renewal of the argument before the supreme court. A re-argument of this natura would consume practically the same amount of time required for the original argument I decision.

Such a motion would necessarily hue to he on the basis that the court failed to. decide some material point presented In the 111 of 108 separate objections. In voicing their sentiment forVaDt log a new trial. Justices Fish and Beck said that the evidence ofConley as Dalton was inadmissible. In that it re lated mostly to Pranks alleged conduct with women other than Wary Phagan.

They held that are accused USOD cannot be expected to face lb court ac uations other. than those contained In the bill of indictment. Men untrain ed la" legal processes of reasoning as jurors for' Instance are liable to ho influenced greatly they held toy such irrelevant testimony rTney conclude thsOpinion rend that persons guUty of this. crime might lb. equally asrulty ut that.

The remlttur of the supremo court- the legal form of the decision will reach the superior court within a pe rlod not less than ten days. Prank can then be brought be Core Judge Hill forreaanieac ffQt less than twenty. days and. pot morethan sixty can expire-between sentence and execution. Jim CQDItrl by the decision of the supreme court.

is made a certainty for the wee of February 23. He will he arraigned. on charge of accessory after the fact. lie declared to reporters yesterday that he had felt confident all the while that the supreme court would affirm the lower tribunals verdict. i They've got the right man.

he de. tiered and he knows It. Dsrsys Stetumcmt. Soil el tor Hugh Doraey expressed no surprise at. the decision of the supreme Frank had a perfectly fair trial.

As near as Is possible to demonstrate a thing of that kind mathematically It. was proved guilty. From the very first suspicion pointed to him. The detectives suspected him from the very. first.

I was nut satisfied with mere suspicions anti wet Ito the ease from-every angle. I wanted to find the man whi. was guilty It made no difference to me who he Was. I I-cramp convinced of Pranks guilt and 1 ID convinced of It today. ii.

had the benefit of the bet legal talent money could buy. lie had position and Influential friends to serve him. The Jury thought him guilty anti said so the trial Judge thought he had been given a fair trial and refused to grant him a new one. The supreme court has now stated that th lower court did not ert. I am sorry for the family and friends of the man who have stood by him so loyally.

flesdeete. of ieii The be of the decision in the Frank cu. read as follows On the trial of on accused of th murder 4E a youn girl in a factory building of which we. suprintsndet where dr somtaat1at evidence Is relied upon large IT If act wholly. to prove the defendant' nil It Is not svfllclMit cams ov tiMW- trial Ui special aets of.

tia wf was permitted to rov tttew eight watobmaa' of iii asS body. A yen Ctrl wa killed is a pencil factory on Saturday afternoon which we also a public holiday. whsn the factory we net la operation. Tile evidence showed that she went to the office of the super- Istintleat or per. end no witness tsoti fled to hayl11" seen her all.

thereafter. There we. other evidence nom. which Ui Jury might Infer that th klllinc occurred in a room on the same floor where the office of th suprtntssdssi was situated. An employee of the factory.

who was pose slit Is the building testified that on that morutOc the ceased had sect to him the desired the witness to watch for hit II tho witness had bean doths the root of the Saturday- or Othor that he old welsh sttka doov when the girl went up to the om- of the accused that he heard her screemI that subsequently the accused- called to him. to wtt la re- mortal US body of the deceased. Court Did Not Err. lie also testified to certain signals given by Us aceusd to him while watch- ins. Held.

that It we. competent to by the wltsess how ha had been wt In roe the accused on parlous Saturdays and toexplain the system or such altered 01. Cal. employed by the aoonaed. and the ref- rnc thereto by the aoonaed.

a Th same witness testified that. after th girl had eon. to the office of ii. aceomi. had heard footsteps rot.

in the direction of the place whir. he trot Cat. the body. end after herin the scream and th signal from the sccur the latter told th witness that he want ed to be with a little girt and she Titus. him.

and he struck hoc and reseed he truck her too hat cud she felt end hit head Ze1nt omthig sod its did not know how badly 15 was hurt. Wit. nose then said that the added Of course you knew I sint hilt like ether men. Prom the condition of the body It might have hero red that the person who did th ktillg sought to hare a so. 151 relation natural or with the dseused and that th blow did not eanaa death but it was brought bout by choklns the deceased with a cord.

Held. that It was relevant to explain th sipi-ewis- ended to showing previous trances lion. of u. accused known to him sad to wttneam. which indicated that his conduct mtUf dipd from cf As a general rule sidsnce of ii commission of one mints la sot edmiesiti upon a triei for other where- th ole purpoe 1 to snow tt4 th defendant has been guilty of other trim anti yowl therefore be more Itabl to commit the How to Roast a Superb FERRIS TRADE MARK HAM The JM High Company Will Furnish You the Ham and Recipe I at same mien.

not a ereet rhll Infe homicide nod In nrard to watch- iaCDr rthlPnnt vtnuiaT VU laMrtotu vac bttof uaewlu at tksh place aad is ncardto companlalini aim we. adnuadble 5. throwinr the Jurr to tied. that th murder I aa the criminal. Tarasrapb I.

Under tin- facts of. the tbGriud oeearred. aad tendlnr to show the Identity rf eaae It wu lynInot to shOW as to cUr- unetac Indicating a tnosfleu of guilt that the defendant who ha interest is ttlD out the' perpetrator of. in hoBtitid or- be rummlRlc which he was ubsequsntiy indicted and Motives for that purpose erg had Interviewed one peraon sunpected rstoed an Interview to tics Indicating that thede ondant wa Cent. of the wltneaa liOnel- re or the defendants huh.

when such mltted to rive the details of experiments on which his tontlmnny la bloat. Health Bo o.mey. Pnsraph I. The details of a leontro- verar between the former president and i secretary of the tat board of health in their official relation S-a. foreign to any Issue Involved In tile trial of lb.

The I testimony was provoked by question' pro- pounded by counsel to. the defeat who dl- reeled examination of Lie witnesses. Tho testimony did not tend to obscure ay Isroe In the case or prejudice th defendant and the reception It. vf4nce td the excerpt from th minutes dTitiiw tt board of health dealing with Inch controversy Se no round for new trial. Where It wan material to Chow el what time the girt who wa killed arrived at th lotion at which the homlcld.

occurred ad after this point the contentious of till state Sod the wd differed as II II in retard to the toilet at which eh left the street car on which at. cam from hr home end th defendant evidence to Show the she.iie-l time at which the ear WeI due toarrive St certain point where It wu claimed PI' behalf of the state that the left It. and th tint. It would re quire for the ear To-so from that point to notb at whichthe claimed that th. girl alighted an well II the ttlmony of certain yltecRes.

that the car is question reached the first point at the time fixed by the schedule specifying It I one of them testified on examination that we never arrive In advance of schedule time and where the defendant also Introduced other evidence us to schedules- or lb. street Cars on another route 4ft the effect to acco the defendant' presence. St otter places at. aucb Umea Curing day. It St.

competent for the solicitor general to thoroughly sIft the nrltneimeft Introduced by the ftprta4 on cross Anti also to Introduce evidence In rebuttal tend In" to show. In addition to the Met that the testimony of a witnean for- th cud was Inexact In regard to the schedule that in fact the car on the line traveled by the girl In going from her jIlts I. the factory frequently arrived St the point above men tlond Beyer minutes in advance Or schedule time lrapcachlient of Wltnreses. a Ifln DT respect the cross-examination or th evident. Introduced In rebuttal was not strictly within th proper vane.

of w-h evidence. It soc not of such a. character an to require a reversal. 7. Th testimony referred to In the seventh division or the opinion was relevant.

and property received by the court. 8. A wllneM testified to matters material to the defense. She was asked if her ages had not I Increased the pareBtof the accused's wife and If a tier had not born mad to I by tbe thu accused and anneri In the negative Upon laying the proper foundation for impeachment. It wa competent to Introduce her own affidavit ant tile testimony of another witness to- how that she list wad.

Tatrrnent. contradictory of her testimony stated above. On the trial of one for the Tour of tennis. where the testimony tended to show that tO. garments of th victim of the homicide were torn I hr or.

tan. had suffered violence. and the defendant introduced a witness to 0' tabUb hi. good character. It waa competent on fl to ask such wit ness if he hot not heard of certain lctvl OUt acts of th defendant with other fe- mate.

10. Likewise under the circumstances referred to the re note where the II. ondant introduced evidence of his rood character the prosecution I reply by ottering proof his' general tad character for lasclvlouaness. 11. Where the court Instructs lb.

Jury under degree and trensth of circumstantial I evidence essential a- conviction. In the language of the statute it la. generally not ground I-e a new trial that he declines to tics it written vaguest Abstractly Ioborat ing this rrlleiin of evidence. Regarding' Disorder In inert. a The request et wit to ground a SO 61 and 62 of the motion for a new trial re not BO accurate or appropriate as ret.

application of the principle involved as to render the failure to In them cause for a new trial. In a. pointed out Is th twelfth division of the opinion the request to charge to therein set out Invaded the to of the and was properly refused. t. Where a defendant pats STe chart- Tea-Dollar Order.

Groc fT Speciala. Guaranteed Freflh Country EGGS do No. It Pall Pore lot lard II Fall ewpoead White Bait Boa pound. e. 10 Veins Syrup 440 lb.

Sack Beat. Floor Vegetable end Poultry at Who Prlcra Sewell Commission Co. US-IS Whitehall 1M thestar Cash Grocery Grmvy Item. pe md. Loin sell Porterhouse 9 Steak pound I al 72 nest Rib Roast pound XOC Lamb 1 A Leg.

pound JOC Lamb 1 hops pound I All Pork SanBte. pound All other mealp St reduced 25 5C Tfo. 2 Corn. 1 ea y2 lie. lie-ad Rttt.

pound KTT Besot I Cacti IIJC White Peaa I sV art IOc Lisa lIes. lOc 1 i alt. Pea 1 ea lOC 20e Stuffed Oliver I Kb bottle IOC Walter Baker teron. 3 la. en 9B Woeetee Vase.

kettle lUC California L. Pa-ache. Irish Potalon. peek New Strlns Hewn. hlivis Hpa4 lIelluew.

TunSpt Uk Pean HnUli Fl. Crfcrr. Te atea Csuilflewr Carre 7 E. Mitchell St ten1 tie JIIUBILSBJOSI mr videan tislisi to skew that his eJiarswterta respect a trait to- la the to bad. fallacy to examine th Tibttthg to i.alti- nate- r-oead fee arg LUtewls.

esos- el fm the tat may discuss any feature or the defendants statement I the which had been mad. by a counsel for the accused to the etrcBUMtasjeesj of celebrated cries- 101 ease. oncoming In California- and of htieoBceenon tbe right of to surlier cal to Ukewla dlaeoa the fact that 1 In regard to It. Os on yes rained of-a. tel.

gTflK from th to the TSsdief trtet attorney In See Francisco there yes BO error Is sJlowtng the solicitor rnrml to prooeod with 555 ea an that subject. without ch telegram or letter. Nw did It furnish canoe far granting a new trial that the pres4dlns Judg8 Old nn charge to the effect that tbe facts of the cam above mentioned and other celebrated rears referred by the solicitor general In Is argument should Bars no Influence noon the Jury In making their verdict and that they should try this case upon Its own facts and the evidence Introduced therein. It not inc that Say ruUn was Invoked Is regard to the uncut of ease. other titan that be mentioned or that UT written qae was mod.

Invoking a charge of the Indicated. Medical Witnesses. is. Whether or not the- argument of the solicitor general sekIot to deduct an Inference teem the examination on behalf of the- accused Of certain medical witnesses and. from their testimony that they mote have been summoned because of being torn- ll physicians and yell to me of the members of the jury.

was mortal or I well-founded under the colloquy1 which ws I had by counsel among themselves and with th court and the statements solicitor ten' ra or stop him from making uh srument will not. under the fat of tilt cast rul a reversal. Th. alleged disorder la the court room during the progress of the trial won not. of such character as to invpurn tli fsJrneM of the trial.

or furrlsh sufficient rounds for teverirg a judgment refusing a new trial. a The court was authorized tent the evidence to fled that certain cheerier or applause outside of the court room re rred to In the sixteenth division of tho pinion. was not heard by th jury and that they did not have knowledge of th nme until after the verdict We. returned 7. Where a verdict to received In open out a roll the lot-I' demanded.

end while the poll is being taken loud cheering from persons or the outside If heard. and which Is continued until aft. the poll 1' concluded and where Iron the- evidence the court Is thorld to find that ft. jury was son Influenced to render other than true answers the questions propounded the circumstances of the cheerio. on IS.

utside Is not sufficient ground to require a new trial. Judge Rosa's Remark 1' On conflicting evidence tile to. on th harlot ofthe motlootor new trial. it Ing as trior. ltd not err in holding that the jurors whose Impartiality was attacked were competent.

lb. When the order overruling a motion or Inc trial contains nothing to In rilcate tnat the Judge we. dln atlsrled with the verdict. to that he failed to exercise the tierrello required of him by law. the supreme court will not.

In determining whether the judge has exercised such discretion consider prjU remarks made by hire Trendtng the ot the motion. 20. The evidence supports the end there was no abuse of discretion I. un a new trial. No Ground to.

Revemal. To the main opinion of lbs tour lattices upholding the lower court. there occurs th following comment on that ground of th motion for a now trio. which rlted Judge Roans remarks at the tliae he denied that motion In the lower court' The bill of exceptions recites that the lodge orally stated that the lure had found the defendant guilty that he. th Judge.

hod thought bout this dc than BAT other ho hail ever tried. thal ho was not certain of the defendantsguilt tht with all the thought Pr to. put or- Jti was not tn ughJy convinced whether Frank was guilty or Innocent but that he did not hay. to be convinced- that the Jury was convinced that there was no room to I ubt that that he felt It hlR duty to order that the motion or a onto trial be lated tn remarks node by tJuJrtBT is dTID the new trial Iodict ed Judicial disapproval of the Verdict. We do not think HO.

The Jury found the used guilty. Tile court was called upon to determine ether under the record the defendant should be greeted a now trial. lie refused It. and the rule In such cone in that even If the court should consider a case weak. t.

If overrules the motion for a new trial one ground of which Is that the verdict Is contrary to law and evidence his lesal Judgment expressed in overruling the mtloD will control and If there la sufficient evidence to rapport th" Xf h5 court not otre beimisl of the Judges oral expression so to his plmlon- Brmy T. State fit Ga 7 4 far. Ft. ad. Wtes.

fey. Co. v. Stein. h.auese- Go.

11) KrUssM Deffioits to field. Tbe lee paragraph of the main opinion Is as- set The record ftn this case Is voluminous. We have Attempted to group the various luifletest. or scow Se as to bunt the Pyle. toe wlthlsi tabis grounds.

Some of the points are deemed of minor Importance not amounting to error and some of them won son referred to in the briefs and therefore no sphdflc reference Is mod. to thorn. We hens given careful no1dratlo. to the done. sad we belle.

that the same Is sufficient to uphold the. rdlct and. as no snbetantlal woe was committed in the trial of the case th discretion of the court to refusing a new trial will Sot be disturbed. Judgment affirmed. All th jutle eorcur.

except Fish. C. 1. and Beck. 1.

db sentior. The main body of the opinion commented as follows on th second alleged In the motion for new trial that the court had erred In permitting Solicitor General orsty In his argument to comment IC the failure or Mr Frank to vlstt her husband right alter he waa accused of the murder Exception was 510 taken to the cout permitting th solicitor general in his ar mn to comment upon the failure or counsel for the defendant Jo exsjnlne cer tain m-ltn W9 ottered Cy the eialn and aso to comment upon the failure of tf wife or the accused to visit him In jail. Whet he. been id ov rrullppr another ground covers the lret of these cum- plalnts. Au to tin.

latter tile cued to his statement had referred to the failure of his wit. to visit him soon alter hit. incarceration Sod had given an explanation of it sad the solicitor had a right to com meet OB the statement. Two Jo mm. Paragraph to of tie male opinion re.

ferred to bias alleged against the two jurors. Johonninir sod Ilonsieo The 3d Around the mottitn fur a Ott trial Is Because tbt Jurcr A. H. Hon- pint tat not a fair sod iroluortInI Jurnr. hilt prejudiced against the defendant I was selected as a Juror.

end previously thereto had expressed decided opinion La to the guilt or. the defendant nod when selected as a Juror we biased against the The xnovant submitted evidence tending to show that previous to the trial. hi particular juror had made certain expressions to different people. Indicating a strong Sloe and prejudice ant the uwl The Juror denied under oath it made any statement in substance hat lie wa. hi.

i and prejudiced against to. accused and on the other-hand positively affirmed that ye. uaprejodloed et ta tea6f- that ia mind ye. perfectly lapeoed the trial. The rmle- Is riser th Impartiality of a Juror etn nnao W7 a motion or a new trial.

be come a trior a to th oaoa med. ad Judgment wTn not It. dlIarbd uisa i appeared that there ha. been as abva discretion. Wall v.

Stats 1" On the corueU evidence there abuse of discretion In tic. Another Juror. Mr. lohnIog was at tacked. but under th eonrucU.

evidence ye think the moot did not abuxe his discretion IS holding that he was set PJ diced or bia d. v- Prelurally without reception. Udter Donor waa upb ld on every poled by. Ux upm court. PROBE WILL BE MArJE OF GRAFT CHARGES MADE BY SAM CRANE A general prob of tire chars in U- tilted ajcainsL thu two turukyo named In Attorney Sam Cranes accusations has been BulVlod by the apodal hord of poll re commissioners appointed' at th Um Crimes startllnp charges were male last Tuesday night.

A riiletu prullo will be made of the department and Kraft eborl tw. This a vcommt nded by Commis callers Vernoy and rtarnPi Commis- aior Johnun however. eunted to this motion o1violn that only Crantis- es ho taken up. I am in favor of a complore and thoroutfn invfsiisMtioT1 iid COSI. mlaione Vernoy and Garner.

A r-'i 0110.1 nPlio of the board will ho ht at au earl date to pro- mut. Llii I MIKiitlull James J. Hill Not raid. Wasninxiuii. Vhruary IT.

James 1 Mill toll t. Jn Ail of I the house commerce committee he did. feel gs should be. i apprehensive or th administrations trust legislation program. Costs Less Bakes Better CALUMET BAKING POWDER ECONOMY t' ne thins a looking for in these days of high living cost Calumet wares a -wonderful saving in your baking.

But it does more. It ItiDsll1ewbolesome foodtasty food uniformly raised food. Calumet is made right to sell right to bake right. Ask a million of women who use it or ask your grocer. RECEIVED RICHEST AWARDS Wselda Puce Feed Lepoeitioa hiea It.

JOHNSON CO. Atlanta New York Paris Fields of Beautiful Cottons From Which It Seems Every Atlanta WomanCouldPickHerSpringDresses The new eottonsare here. And now begin the days of planning selecting and making the new dresses. This year such days will be filled with much pleasure. So many new weaves such exquisite colorings such impressive newness on all sides.

New spring cottons it sounds trite and commonplace to tell the plain truth about them that the display is the most varied. the most satisfying we have invited you to see. But that is just what it is. Cottons have never been treated as these spun to the thickness of gossamer at one time rough and heavy at another. brocaded as sumptuously as regal silks or spreading out as a surface whereon have dropped the flowers of nature and then besides these are the snowt1aky.

crepes. It offers much very much. to those who would have started. on the spring things much in novelties much tn the year-in-and-year-out stripes. Read some of the interesting things The new dress ginghams at.

Kimono crepes 27 in. wide. galateas. 27 inches wide. 150 Colored striped figures 28 in.

wide. Cotton mulls in colors 27 in. A new Grecian messaline in colors 27 inches wide age New cloth in colors 28 in. Ratine crepes. in colors 32 inches wide 290 Ratines.

in colors striped 28 inches wide age Brocaded new cloth. in colors. 28 inches wide 3SC Brocaded crepe mulls 28 inches wide. 3SC and 50 trench tissues flowered 28 inches wide soc. Brocaded French mulls 36 in.

wide6sc Brocaded crepes. all colors 28 inches wide joe and 650 Plain crepes. many shades 32 inches wide 6sc Ramie linens 48 in. wide col- ors 6s and 750 French crepes colors 40 inches wide 750 French ratines many novelties 45 inches wide. 100.

125 and 150 Flowered crepes 38 inches widexoo si Jolinsoll Co-a lH i lf 1' Jate4.ru 1etl7f 1 at1D oplnlotof Chief Justjo. Iah at. rtleeBecItotthe he beDc I. nD4JlDatI attleto the The sentiment i I thetheO 7 il Im De D. Impro a th detJUan II of.

th I 2 sprap 1710 a' 19. S4e Caa Jeae ice c. Pnoodol' S4e1 Prlaeae 1eaJolf 01. Ue 11 Battle cJo lie Ge. II.

Ce 8. Ha III. PlaeappIefl. 21e 17e Ra.III. P1aplell OIlY.

1 V1 ys Port rlioui. I GROCERYCO I f1Id1 t. IY Wat En LDmPkiDfW ID1PnatapItI and 11 u. elrcuB ta. IW IlItQh aaaedo perf y.

du Y1de lea 1MI nll 1a. women ti. ii. lDul' lJ 4. Th tl JIIStl.

is brieflyand the Pn. tIa. decta1 DJI Tlde the i 01 ahWHIot 1D1 lI. Wo Roitb lf to. 41dl1OtcoaalcJI np eelone I lal zred I.

oe ka aD 111JiID cUdoto 0 Fr. IY pe ecIOutat Solicitor Gonertl I trl1aDd. Ual-o. toundcCUllty. glLil ty bell.

I Ut I 01lcIt01m tlI l1teD. I he rly Done Im te I J1Ox'f dle8enUg ellved D. oPnI I etJ to. tho e. I bl of liD eDt I I Ftn 4 OQ i St les izced dese ing st redut ons liS 15 Cioo 335 Ii i95 .0 0 SALEOF HE RIG ERA rORS 2000 2500 DISC lNT th l' eg 1 a l' disco We Ice Regular ce.

5500. fit' No 560250 I No t- Nat421. 1r- 4590. 1 HARDWARE I. l' d.

ui wOOll4 U. of the 1 do. 4" 8Im11ar the a of ule Georgia i IL blue hat41s4ef U1lft or otn th. 1Det. cue in the the tr1af etono1j1dB aD f.

DW ea4th. ID thaurm to the rnment. 1. uo. mad of stated mlghtIDVolve Imll Fran1 of ldeD This would h.

b. the" trlaleourt 0. BeD' 1 I. in- beforwrd urt 8 Dr th. 01 eedoy I.

llltl utlceBecl I ut he Dew 1 bet. orthl 8Il a bill vol lng of ld re- latedmoUy th. brpeote fe1u ourtc untraln. onlng th. IrreJtttImODJ Qdllo.

the OlfliLfl rea" uaU pllt7Q. ofth u1uemoourt will pe- I tJrouc. hi. before torteleateaceiOC thaq. 4 IlDdllot retb.

eXo. I I 10rth. Febru. I terday I bll. I I I lh ht I be.

kDo. I lItt I Solicitor of. ourt I be' ver a from. every tY 1 to natnlitI orJ jllr 8 iv fu' rJ Il gt ate4tha lo e. famllyd ak ODt' the ell fU 7 be II dDt tnU ovl I.

1 10 f. tbaApociai test. toe" 50 ala. ef the' oa car'- Ut. oftJ bod cll II f.

04. hor. wit. h. the the II IOT" II Dtlo hull" cb I a 01 01 ati wbe.

1. mool. bod ud tcb I. II It 010. Surd to' ft lai" am ail.

IOTo4 The lOa u. tbs tbe h. I. tu the ccu thi It ro' ck 10. 10.

aoaI. II eo. kD. oYr m. th.

u. a I the bt I 1 unnatural. With the bl. a lot okln. UO 11 the ox nollion abc tron tI.

kno. witn. I.c" In u1 10. that 0 oth. r1 oId tJI.

0. lbs too rl t. X4a u. ro 11a 1. O.

11t U' IhJcIt to Olbdrea front the oJe tile d. e' which bile 4. i Im. iS. pi.

g. be t. tb oM to. pUcoa that pl-- eo. neotIonth which the d.

Sn. tho ndI IcIn u.ho cODocIo. he4 tor the h. Ie for nll uy ur t. 1 r3rc aw.

It ed" iD" II trnDl by tln. In iodin. IS. one b. had nipiused Wh.

the ttlmo of Itn I. comt b. my be r. it lrImnt eo. rapb 4 0.

II ho roc. 01. it D. ol oour. e.

the on the dr f1o and D. Ived th. 1IIc. 11 she c. tb.

Oded II to' ti. 0' POIDtO ntbrr whleb. the wlt ti. 0. u.

ti. vld o'- :1.b up 1. aoucb tbe day. 11 0 ltn roo I I f. UTlO bT' ID rth I gv a vral Ulotlme Im Wlm.

US. CUT It. ndn ulro Tile 0 VDt Ivd ItD om 0 Sh.11 d.c' hi rf 0 tho poD ou letlcn 11 te to. III. D.

out. wltn. 00 1 w. 0 n. the In Llk.

re- I d1 do nht I I his. nr lvlo. u. I oD th oDod for. D.

I 1 I. Ht 2 ccu 0" Of" pr dt tt1 III provl. I IJ" IIen4. frm Ordero Dlhoro G. 24Y2c pU No.

Me po" 12" 18 Flour nit. i 154 I I 22 7112 I 15 ut. 15 ci 171hc I. f71f2c leer 10 ad c' eat re4 prl. Poal.

ns 0.7 huller F. Dn t. 0 5 7c dH I 1 IOc e. LIOc 15 11 1 0 19c ana- oter I 0 II 15c 24 N. ItrI H.

at 1. FICeIetTToa rrsi. 6 IlEMitcli ll 1 tal. wI 1 orth 41. pta1ef ybieh a u.

Call' his 011 11 IIb to Of the d. th. I rood bJ I bt I tt I. b' 3' tbf bratd to Mrol ou nil. t.

CUI vld Dvold ka1 WIt umDf ItD aln th. IIItA Ib d' un he i. trial. Im urn to. rurr" UD D.

S. ppl Ye- 0 lII tnth the Itnoe l. tire Wb. oll of hlth bolD rom 1 ovid. to und nc1 ouDd lr.

the ID of. tho 1lon fo tln bo Ii to jud. II dltInd enr" I. cld 1 0. uppo n.

Fm. oceure tho lbs n. Ju. Ro" ot I Jud I I Jud. er drndnt gull 11 this ease he thoroughi 0 fI hi n.

ovrruled It I. tht sits the Ju found an. c. I. reoaidnr c.

ne ov. uDd vlOo hI 1. tha verdict thi 1lI became lad. to. I.

i ot I-E. I. opl. I In. ap po th.

I rt1 10. 1. a UI the n. tr. 111 the uaU" n.

iltI bod the nDd n. DorS t. u-t dri ptlOD 1. tlo" the ner1 I t''f I 0 10. Jest ound th.

h' raU t. hod. emn ProJadI. iD reo f. b' al unra Henaoo Ii3 cu fh.

rug nH ff.n I not. Imn" I I defendant In vor of th. I 001. nd u. on' i thath1a I it InUlal 118 1Iat i.

the lItT 51 I th. I. b. 1110 0' G. tt no I as Lb urt.

tlon SoUoItr D. upheld probe-of inaLi tUtedain wo I In I Inl I police apPointed. the nn tUn Tu. I 1 to. ue a urnmnded CO" mo th utll Cran I I conpl I thoro Un I or.

ill It 1 111 ao Wa1jo tu" ruft' 7. J. tolI fl com mitt. Ott I I one you are th cost mor food. tasty uniformly to to one of the millions US or tIoa.

Cl ca. se4eEtie. Much 1812. Wt i I JOHNS ON oman Could Pick Her pring Dresses suchexquisite I it 1 them-that th i s. I These-spun thi kness goSsamer sump.

things things- nYzc 50C m. I7YzC zc Col red wid 6sc mullsin In. wldezsc SO i 2SC ew wide. 2SC Rat ne 3. 6sc tines.

in. 75 French ew In obnso DuBoseCo 0 lated. Will the mnUng opitloo C. prim. new ni hattie- for admission of wit.

uses. alleged con- 2811. 1 3G. IS. SCna W.he.e..e----- f.

See as Prewea esa tea Pews24e iy ekes. see 5e fle Bawai1ea5ldPlepplel7. Olives Tiesia Oil 1 llenslb Bs. flicting pinle bewesses Dissented by MW tkne fti ed Lumphin. wee thkt Plan.

partle- dar Ca. the particular. murdet whith he was duO. hi. murder.

be wee thelrdecilion' wa of ii a triaL" that th tiat now was--proper did of the ssto tial eoe. guilty solicitor wIll I In this Ca. 0" i Ifl Wo in i I Fine Wint 1 I Bcio- I is I 515 a. 95 I' ooShoea 1- 4icL05 I 1 I Ourl9l4stockofre- ei I f1iI i- of2O to25 c- 11h l's I 1 I box 5 5000375O Ii i I 540. .100 5500.

541150 555200 I Not I No. I INo i I No. 4. I No 55150 IKtNG eacee 11 lilt the preme. di- lecUy wesild maaou I It a delve handed dews I esday.

ar. the his. i Ii I. expected that th. defense si the I 5 I trIslhe before ludgi to the Ith in ie I td b.

rights. This i. i Reps 1. Opiaiew. madf Chlefjustlce a a th i Conicy uct person i aL- I ii In I urors.

i rThyconctuds rlme aa ullt. an ot a AYS cm ir. between Cciuys trial week i 5 tbelower de- I I ear It Is rry I I 4 I im mc i if 1 od 3- thcughthlm aid I tile ourt wh 55 young ci I eh lly lO5fli. C. the be.

isa prove iS a- dsmeaesed tartar met- emCeed 01 the inirsing eftsr diesves7 i. a yiews wad thersof isl lam ocoorre it th. ie 5 othm tic. al U. r.

U. wacaio as to Sattisin U. I aeces. tbal I 0 fir. Lb wa1 sii I hi t.

hoe II I ot WI I ob choki I Lb. oihi5rnLmatm bl. tr 001 I. the Cds. ii.

th I I ii jjhcf ff okarsed b.s- aesisl aad risst is be Isa sa trial sat dmiedbie bsem It mU 155 5 sse to sae tea dstssdascs lt of el 1kw mae II. ons cbaZCSd. it 054. It. Tile 101 aaconctd Lb.

sc vtdae et the Wltofll. Chews mauhlimot. 5 hich II Was scuihe s. cud also ldctes antbr wit- 1L o- nrnberied In Tisesi other luprnss trasachIOnS 4th wose. wSlab Lbs 55si took part.

comrIs 1 chili before i bs 155 eg by tbs nest Im. cilia radUos yes. te ea resd to rs5ftsr. us pkt Cpu. Oh.

enoitre 1 ts. sccemd a Ce Indk-aUne hi. design or schemes fPSarl I. his at In nensddo. with sldeec Ia uilt II IOC rator eke a ad takn part Is it.

tpI-tment of tie- re tIT. th i. Deep. iiuc0 tel end lIt. tie- 0 v.

tile ntervIew usa i tnVtlVes. ill- I nph a. Wir I sl0 hl a I I I. uses Case. rh.

tmmfl 0 trJudlcIthe nd ront ealth ontrover 57 w. hat tin 0 I ynil hlch lift root ot. Iii :000 he to StriVe 0 here e1l 0 hu I a ec liii II t. SIn swelae ertain I bce Ill. re allilflfltlflfl A nis o3 to enact.

000 III ala Air at Ii. SI. It 0 i lfl0o i. ilirod ur.v17 ns Sit. tlmOn srrle ti asset art n5 in ti- l.

till It 10 retect 0 Ivtm- iu- 1 eel done 7 lImper' lii nd 1 At el 0 15 ii iI- arest I. aT I I 5 Ii. I rownnf' idavlt st- I 9 vi I lIe I inicTire-------- he ent 11 Ie0 P. rtr recTal lee in i wit icr nIrvuTon ro WI- I COil Or. no.

I. vi gt. 10 nI it 4. 5rennTntr. ngth I rrr.ee- tinl aro Ilt'i th I.

rli. TIc roan I I I' 45 aE it Ion ovvd ii tao. the rnquec TI ar ad 1l. I GT tIe. B.

I I i i Trscsce oTlatry ited 1w penleul. I 1 2 I 1 i I. i5 I I a 1 2 1 1t j' I 50usd lOc Frrsliil.4 Cousiry reas oeOirV l-Cgge Jc 2 Toussinc- NoICoru ass-------------------- Rtr possd. 7 asset. I 1 1 I .55 s.

Zn mute 1 I Kb I rae------------- r-h 4 t. Egusk ltedishe Temetsew i. l. 5d th sf2511 ebetlal s51 ire to eined is Lbs the wlts. at.

ersesCt Ini an h. thU I. reference wn as Sr I I I. 01 the the I ss a tslegeem Inch a peetditleoiTlife cUt S5belflflOllod nd tard at nn. enami natleflon nd.

ave bold TUe S. 0 ad ral or- lit et aire item cmiv 511. ii rue he a a trio ion I in- ii. ila 11 seonrc load end enrnu I ilovortlict. I Roro rIte am I 000eo t.

ordtithat lrSltd jutig. we It tb eoourthoo lit yet. I nt 0111 yStat. 550. 1t Ci IS Zlid Tbs 0 I an.

Il Sia ef- SI. erdlct tttoo 3. J. com I 111 h.ao ISee0urts moor. I hI Sr.

Jocroec elamine lteae 01mm entllpre tOe aid I ocerru iiog lOot aenOt 2 I cen50000l000 lIlt tosm Of Jorern. fld Jill It I preuileedagptn Ic hadeepye ciTed of hen ISestate. eel denc so. flinecl I agaho k- the seoeesdn ma4 hIs lsCi I taathybAa challenged SC ledi a. Lbs his 05lClt 7 Gsi4 itt.

as ease. 10. bIased. SoU lt Lbs charges- to corn tiny rvtttttIot' I crIhoy i I tleru the 0 0 It pLilli. 7 1.2 0 I.

ECONOMY me 0 eavin ofthe ofwomen yrsan. tTuaae D.C-c Tu lt aemywba in. let apnomabnb. psode. DOtb k1.

Sep Cbed 5' em. iai- oim bat rook. taced lao pw miSsed 51. rdHAMBERLJoHNsoNDuBosE I Woman ick SpringD resses file out 35 oc In. 65c a 7 xoo L25 Coi.