Democrat and Chronicle from Rochester, New York • Page 7

ROCHESTER DEMOCRAT AND CHRONICLE Tuesday, Ian. 19, 1971 7 Javits to Break Silence On Buckley Seating Issue Analysis mmmmmm PHONE 546-4400 FOR PURITAN'S PIN-MONEY PANTSUITS s16 Here today, there tomorrow these are the kind of pantsuits that will lend fresh zing to your pants wardrobe, north or south. Hand-washable acetatenylon, bonded to keep their trim shape. 10 to 20. A.

Tab trim, yoke bodice. Navy, yellow, blue. B. Button-front long tunic. Navy, blue, pink.

By JOHN SIMONDS Gannett Ntws Service WASHINGTON James L. Buckley, soon to be known as "Conservative-Republican of New York" in official Senate listing, apparently isn't letting the silent treatment by Sen. Jacob K. Javits, worry him. Buckley, for short, has decided on the two-party designation as a way of preserving his affiliation with the party on whose ticket he ran, even though he is an enrolled Republican.

How this sits with Buckley's senior colleague, Javits, will be known today when Javits lets the world in on his strategy at a press conference in New York City. In November, Javits let it be known that he might oppose Buckley's seating as a Republican in the party's Senate caucus, with its attendant benefits in seniority and committee assignments, but gave no details. Since adjournment, Javits has been vacationing in California and New Mexico and keeping his own counsel. But Buckley, who ran against Javits in 1968, has been getting ready for the 92nd Congress with clear assumption that he will win a warm welcome among a large majority of the 44 members of Dresses, Third Floor, Also Pittsford and Ridgemont -VU yy xm But Saffir sought yesterday to minimize the report that a "cold war" has developed between F. Clifton White, Buckley's campaign manager, and leaders of New York's Conservative party over whether Buckley should abandon the party label under which ae was elected to make himseif more acceptable to Republicans.

"There's been no 'cold war'," Saffir said. "There's been none of that The senator's always been an enrolled Republican will preserve his identification with his conservative constituency." If Javits does announce that he plans to oppose Buckley's seating as a Republican, he would be hard-pressed to find a majority of support among the Republican members. Some might go along with him as a courtesy, but as of yesterday afternoon not even Javits' most liberal colleagues had received word from him about his plans. In dealing with the Buckley seating request, Senate Republicans are working in an area with relatively little precedent. Aside from the Democrats' experience with Oregon's Wayne Morse who started out as a Republican, switched to independent and then became a Democrat the situation involving several Democrat-Farmer-Labor senators from the Midwest, there is little to go on in deciding on odd-party participation in two-party caucuses.

On the House side, minor party members have traditionally been excluded from the two-party organizing activities. New York City's Vito Marcantonio, an American Labor party member in the 1930s and 1940s, for example, did not take part in caucuses and also remained at the bottom of the seniority ladder on committees because of his odd-party affiliation. SEN. JACOB JAVITS to bare strategy at Thursday's caucus. In Dec-cember, Buckley sent a letter of application to Sen.

Margaret Chase Smith, R-Maine, chairman of the conference, but there has been no reply to that yet. Buckley said on a Sunday night television program here that, in spite of his differences with Javits, he looks forward to working in cooperation with the veteran Senator on projects of importance to their constituents. A. few days earlier, Buckley's brother, William F. Buckley, the columnist and television personality, said in answer to a question on "Firing line" that Sen.

Buckley always expected to become a Republican if elected and that he was not trying to introduce a third party into the national political system. Whether New York's Conservative party, which tne Buckleys helped start in 1962, was intended to become an institution of its own or merely a means of redirecting the Republican party was reported to have become a smoldering issue in the Buckley camp last week. Court OKs Law On Relief Jobs WASHINGTON W) The Supreme Court upheld yesterday a 1967 law designed to encourage some people on welfare to get jobs without losing welfare-benefit eligibility. Without a hearing on an appeal by a Chicago mother who contended the law discriminates against some working poor who apply for welfare, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the June 1970 decision SEN. JAMES BUCKLEY GOP or maverick? the Senate Republican Conference.

"We never really thought there was an obstacle," said Len Saffir, Buckley's press secretary. "In fact, several liberal Republican senators have said they would welcome him. We don't expect any problem." Although Senate GOP leaders have not yet officially invited Buckley, Senate Majority Leader Hugh Scott, has informally said that Buckely would be allowed in Mrs. Conner claimed the one-in-four provision violated the equal protection guarantee in the Constitution. And she charged the law discriminates against the employed breadwinner and rewards those who have been on welfare by giving them more.

But the government said Congress found it would cost $160 million more each year to let all welfare applicants take advantage of the income disregard provision. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Town Board of the Town of Clarlcson will hold i public hearing on an aDDli- cation for a "special use permit" for the use of the premises hereinafter re ferred to as a campground and general recreation area, and on the following proposea amendment to tne zoning map of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of laid ordinance and the Town Law: of Clarkson. Sa' Amend the Zoning Map to change Amena ine z.oing Map to change District to a Commercial District the following described properties: ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND situate in the Town of Clarlcson, County of Monroe and State of New York, commencing at a point on the center line of the Sweden-Walker Road 2,800 feet plus or minus north of the intersection of the center line of Sweden-Walker Road and Ireland Road; thence, southeasterly along the line dividing the premises owned by Leo Hwiecko to the north and Arthur Ma-kowski to the south a distance of 1,189 feet plus or minus to a point, said point lying along a fence line; thence, continuing in a straight line in a southeasterly direction along said fence line a distance of 3,660 feet plus or minus to a point being the southeast corner of the said Leo Hwiecko property; thence. northerly along the east line of the Leo Hwiecko property a distance of 1,315 feet plus or minus to a point being the northeast comer of the Leo Hwiecko property; thence, westerly along the north line of the Leo Hwiecko property a distance of 3,300 feet plus or minus to a point distant 943 feet plus or minus from the center line of Sweden Walker Road; thence, southwesterly i distance of 1,295 feet plus or minus to a point lying northerly distant 30 feet from the dividing line of the Hwiecko and Makowski property; thence westerly on a line parallel with the dividing line of the Hwiecko and Makowski property and 30 feet distant northerly therefrom to a point in the center line of the 5we den-Walker Road: thence, southerly along the center line of the Sweden-Walker Road to the place of beginning ALSO ALL THAT TRACT OR PAR CEL OF LAND owned by Agnes Ma kowski situate in the Town of Clarkson County of Monroe and State of New York and depicted and descnued as Tax Parcel No.

31-000 on the tax as sessment maps of the Town of Llark son. Said properties are generally situated on the east side of Sweden-Walker Kr.ai in said Town. SAID HEARING will be held on the 2nd dav of February, 1971 at tne town Hall on Lake Road in said Town at 8:30 o'clock P.M., at wnicn time an persons will be given an opportunity to be heard. Bv resolution of the Town Board dated January 14, 1971. LOUISE C.

BLOSSOM, Town Clerk. FP Jan.19 It. Sfari Your Day Bright Read the of a three-judge federal court panel. That panel, In Illinois, said the congressional enactment and a state regulation, "though not free of inequities and inconsistencies, are supported by acceptable and laudable legislative objectives." The thrust of the changes in the provisions for aid to families of dependent children, the Court of Illinois said, was to make families more self-sufficient with certain incomes-exclusion provisions considered as potentially attractive incentives towards employment. Through accepting employment, it was argued, the federal and state governments could save two-thirds of their former payments.

The Illinois panel said that while it may not agree that the income-exclusion provisions, particularly as applied to the mother bringing suit "are either completely wise or best fulfill the social and economic objectives of the AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children) program, still we find these provisions based on a solid legislative foundation The panel said these provisions are beyond reach of a "judicial second guess as to how the difficult responsibility of allocating limited public welfare funds should be handled." The appeal was brought by Mrs. Lula Mae Conner, who has been working at a $69-per-week job since her husband lost his job because of a serious drinking problem, she told the Supreme Court. In addition to her income, she said, the family's only means of support is $34 in monthly disability payments which her husband gets putting the family income at an average of about $300 The so-called income disregard provision of the law says that the first $30 of a family's income plus one third of the rest of the income, is ignored in calculating whether the family is over the state-set need level. If a family's income is higher than the need level, it cannot rely on the income disregard provision unless it had received children's aid funds in any one of the four previous months. Illinois set a need level of $285, meaning that the Connors were about $15 per month above the need, so they were ruled ineligible when they sought aid to dependent children in 1968.

ll tThone 54o-i4blTeTrlaTOOlfmi handy order blank. Please give charge card number when charging, "jj fl E. W. Edwards Son Rochester. N.Y.

14604 El I me Wowing i'ems as advertised in the Rochester Democrat I ES I Chronicle, Jan. 19. I 'tem 'zf 'or ct I 1 Sales Tax. ZZZ tl I A A rl Please give 2nd color choice Total I S- J- Jk A jT Name Mff Lfb Jk 1 'City State Zip No. I i If Jjr jM ijkB I Charge Card Number Lfm JF I li in JiilfjlfilA A) A 1 4 ITI tt 6 Sales Tax in Monroe County: elsewhere in New York State add 3 Hi".