Royal Bowman and others vs. state of ohio, 1840

bri4bri Member Photo

Clipped by bri4bri

Royal Bowman and others vs. state of ohio, 1840 - of the tow-urn bounded lot No. six, set dower ;...
of the tow-urn bounded lot No. six, set dower ; r six, heretofore south sapling, bank, bix pond at the dower point a t e r southeasterly g thence down land; up and l n w i n g water in n g land above, useful. and e description courses e s of the tract. the w i d - sale- CHOATE, Kate your Ashes! / / T HE subscriber u ill pay the highest price for any quantity of good house Ashes, d e l i v e r e d at h i s Black Suits also wanted, for w h i c liberal price will be paid. ALO.NZO I I . FOX. Peru, Jan. 1, lo4U. 50-3 ; B. .STU!ict, 1 STATE OF and Huron Coinnwu Pleat,. vs. of Huron r October is of filed John Ford-the i l l is, to t h e r paying due him on a s;nO contract from and and on a to him said amount by also, to pay of the im- has made as fol- the of lot of o h n Penney for notified an w i t h i n sixt; Court term af f s a i d sixty dajs, wi matters o him, and t Compel. D 1 Term the filed his Court, t h a t on i l l i a m n , h u s b a n d county c k w o o d , j through h i s , contract w i t h sell to said and twenty n the t h i r d now of H u r o n , cents t a n n u a l l y and taxes: consideration, ; that n b l c improvements now bill Cyrus K. Drew, Augustus K. Dudley. Jouathan D. Stoddard, Thomas (Jrinold, John Ratchet, Sanford Peck, James Brown, Lucius V. Bicrcc, Asa E. Daniels, Zudock Bowman, Royal Bowman, James W. B o w m a n , Simeon R e n i c k . ami Hannah, his wife, Joseph l ? arr, and Cosby, his wife, A l f r e d Wright, and Harriet, his wife, EFENDANTS, in this case, will take notice, that the Complainants have filed their B i l l in Chancery, in Court of Common Pleas of the county State aforesaid, wherein they set forth, that they are the Trustees of the creditors creditors of Cyrus K. Drew ; that said assigned to them four several promissory notes against Standlcy and Salmon Weston, Weston, payable in six, eighteen, twenty-four and thirty mouths, and for the sum of eight hundred, forty-one dollars, ninety- two cents; and one note payable^in thirty six months, for eight hundred, forty one dollars, n i n e t y - f o u r cents. Standley Weston mortgaged a certain lot, described in said bill, l y i n g in ^Ity uC'l'vls-ilo, tis.BCCunly Cor said notes. That the legal title ofsaid lot is vested n W i l l i a m Oliver, who sold the iaxter Bowman, and by him sold to Jonathan D. Stoddard, and by him to Standey Weston. Also, a tract of land lying n Ruggles township, Huron county, .herein particularly described, but of which Bradford Sturtevant holds the legal legal title. That Baxter Bowman convey;d, convey;d, or pretended to convey by deed, ot aforesaid,lying in Toledo,to said Stoddard. That Standley Weston has since executed a deed of said lot to Augustus B. Dudley, but that no consideration overpassed for the same. That at the time of the execution of the notes snid, said Salmon Wcslon was in the ownership of a tract of land lying in t o w n s h i p of Ruggles, known as 19, in the \Vakcman and Jesup tract, also eleven acres adjoining the same, being in all about one hundred and acres. That said Weston f r a u d u l and w i t h o u t consideration, said tract to Sanford Peck; that said afterwards re-conveyed the same to said Salmon Weston, by w h o m it was after f r a u d u l e n t l y , and consideration, conveyed to Thomas Gnnoh: and John Matchet. Bill f u r t h e r that said Matchet conveyed his interest to one James Brown, with notice of fraudulent proceedings, by whom the same was afterwards conveyed to one Lucius V. Bicrcc. Bill also states, thai Salmon Weston conveyed to said Match ct other lands, lying in the same ship, for the purpose of secreting tin same and d c f i a u d i n g his further sets forth the recovery of judg ments on two of the nntes above ed; that neither Salmon nor Standle] Weston have any property suujcct to edition ; and pray that all the above scribed tracts of land may be held and sold, and the proceeds thereof ing the by C to pnatcd to the payment of the and general relief. The Defendants arc further notified, that unless they appear and plead, answer answer or d e m u r , w i t h i n sixty next term of the court, the said bill, the matters and things t h e r e i n will be taken as confetscd. D A V I D GIBBS, I . A T J M H R (S OSBORN, Sol'm. 50-0 NOTICE. T my instance, an Attachment issued this day by Henry \V. a Justice of tlic Peace of Lyme Huron c o u n t y , against the effects of Wdlitun JJu»tillnn,nn abr-cond- mg debtor. D. W. B A T , f. Ml ^Datcd lldt \llh day nf Dec. IdW.

Clipped from
  1. Huron Reflector,
  2. 21 Jan 1840, Tue,
  3. Page 4

bri4bri Member Photo
  • Royal Bowman and others vs. state of ohio, 1840

    bri4bri – 19 Feb 2013

Want to comment on this Clipping? Sign up for a free account, or sign in