The Times from London, Greater London, England • Page 3

THE TIMES, SATUBDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1012.. Law Reports, Nov. 1. ction were to be adopted, that the sub tnaaenrayana not. merely voire difficulty la the fact that the Was BOt used, link In Ms nnlnlnn I he, ot the weetlon as they stood meant payable In to wm which had mentioned, and it traa unnecessary that th word only should be added la order to satisfy thai construction.

The subsection continued. notwithstanding any eonlrset between him and the occupier ot such land. nd any contract made between an occupier and owner lands after the passing ot this Act. tor the. payment Told.

It was argued that that onlr referred to a LJn ard uv contract tor payment by the hand ot the occupier oIaiT the tithe owner. He thought, however, thaVeub l.h "ondujion ofthe hearing, which occupied section 2 ot aection 1 and other provisions ot the eight dr. judgment was reserved on October 25. statute bore out the construction which he wa Mr.AU.ln, K.C Jlr. Maurice.

Hill. K.C and Mr. putting on subsection 1. He agreed that there was F. D.

Mackinnon fr ntalntlffa and Mr. Railhache, K.C., and Mr. Adair Roche for the JcoaucvT. Mn. Justice Bavr, in the course of his judgment.

TouchV by the indorsees tinder which benzine oil rcntcharge by occupier should be void. The land WM to hb earned by tho defendants on board their opinion it was clear that 1m came within i ho words of i jij tlla subsection Wthat a contract made between an I rti oeeupier and owner of lands tor the payment of tithe ot UU of U4)aS lord.dld not Uie loss expressly Mrto because be said that the amount should bo paid as rent. In his opinion the appeal should be dismissed. HOUSE OF LORDS. MINERALS RIGHT OF SUTrORT.

TrnWLTuY TKTxK COAL AND CAXNEL COM iXY Tlin LONDON AND NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. iBoMrr LOM OlANCTlXOR. LIU HaLSURT, UD AtMSSOS, CwfUoKCMlAW OF DrMTMOWK.) i v. ITnalrv Part; Coal and Thu was an i. i 7.

X. of the Court of rrevcnv inuiora raising tnerenr. ana mat. Cannel Company against an order oi tne vxmn oi a landlord was entitled to do so. But it a landlord said Arpeal (the Master ot the Bella and Lords JusUcea exprM1j ytn theleasethat thereshould be added totM vvaltoa and HucVley), dated Arril 8.

1911. made In rent each" year the amount which he bad to pay to the action in which the respondents were the plaintiffs Uth owner In respect ot tithe. rentchArge. in his and the arr'lints were the defendants. Bt the order appealei from it was ordered that a iSdrmect ot Mr.

JuUoe Ewi, dstcd June 13, 1910, tlSiild be discharsed, nd tjt the appellants, their ersaU and apents should be perpcUiaUy retrained from worlirg the seam cf coal Vnown a. be TT Beeeton Bed. outside the distance of 0 Tards from tunnel site in such a manner as to witidtsw lateral upport from the tunnel. TV onestion was whether. havinR retrard to iotA T9.

0. 1, 4 of the Railway the recpondenU wrre entitled to a common lVriht of Mipport tor their railway and works. htch wer ronstructed on lands situate in the tewthip of Morley, in the county ot Tork, and tVm bv them from the then Earl ot Cardigan, from such portions of their vendor's remaininfi Un and and minerals thereunder as were siuiate nrtide the distance of 40 yards from th' raHwar and worVs. The case is reported I Tit Timet Iw Beports, UK 1 11 1) 2 tb 80 UJ, Ch 6JT. ttfred tVirra.

K.C Mr. T. O. Lawrence, K.C Vr. Piem.

and Mr. Ashworth James appeared for the arreUsnts. SiTk B. Firday. K.C.

Mr. Ernest Tape. K.C, Mr. Mr. Tweedale tor the reepon drrts were not heard, and their Lordships dumisetl the sppral.

IT GHENT. The Lour CHANrtlXOB said the question was one tmrely of law, and be afrrcd entirely with the decision eitBe Court' of Appeal. The appcllanta were lessees oi coal mines near Merier in Yorkshire, which wore mere than 40 yards distant from the Morley Tunnel, aod the question was whether the railway company wa entitled to an injunction against the appellants to ra tram them Irom worLing the coal thereunder, Vfcit wis called the Mining Cde, Section 57 to 65 the Hallways' Clauses Act, IS 45, was passed to fsahtste transactions between ltuneowners and rsi3rsT companies. The railway company was not to acquire the "mines and minerals unless they were expresily conTeyed. The, mineowner was Ire to werk La mines on piving the statutory notice, and the railway company could fire a counter notice to acquire the minerals Within the 40 yards limit the railway company enjoyed protection and was entitled to lateral and verticil support.

Counsel for the appellants presented the view that the sections ot the Bailvray Clauses Act were a cede in sobstiUition for the common law, and got rid altogether of lateral supports. The sections of the Act related to mines within the 40 yards and did set apply to mines ontside those limits. There as no machinery for land outside them, and the authorities cited rby the appellants' counsel were remote from the case and wholly inapplicable. They wen really merely negative, and in his opinion the Criurt of Appeal was perfectly riRht. The company esjeyed the riffht ot lateral support, as a natural jht of pre pert not arising out of grant.

The appeal should be dismissed. Lord Halsptkt agreed and was quite contented with the Lord Chancellor judement. Lro Atkinsox had nothing to add. 1jOKT Sn enncurred, and said that Scottish writers rerarded the right as nilnral, fundamental, aal pre eminent. Appeal dismissed.

SoUcitors. lUwic. Johnstmc. and for Ttzsandes, and rear Id dc J. Andrewcs.

SHIPOWNERS' BREACII OF DUTY. ASIATIC PETROLEUM COMPANY (LIMITED) T. CARUYINO COMPANY (LIMITED). (Dear Ma. Jones Biut, tilling at Commercial Judgt.) This wai an action ciaimlns dsmajeB for breach of contract and breach of dutr on the part of the defendants In and about tho carriage ot a carp DrssKcmu Jcpcmcst.

Lotto Jvbtict! Bcckltt saM tliat in this case Justice Uray had simply followed the decision ot Mr. Justice Channcll in the case of Lord Ludlow Pile, so that this was in ciToct an appeal from that decision. The question was as to the meaning of section 1. suhnectioif 1, of the Tithe Act, 1891, which 'aid that any contract made between an occupier nd owner of lands tor the payment of the tithe rent charge by the occupier should be void. Did thoae words refer to a contract for the ult Una te incidence ot the burden ot the tithe rentcharce.

or to a con tract lor the payment to the Ut he owner of wbt couu chares in respect of tithe rcntcliarce lie thought they meant the latter and not the former. His Lordship rvterred to the mode ot recovering tithe rentcharpe which was in use before the Titias Act, .1891, and said that the practice which then existed was thereby put an end to. In his opinion the principal object ot the Act was effected by sec tion wldch set up a new method of recovering tithe, rentcharce through the County Court. Tho. prrsent case turned on the meaning of section 1, sub section 1,1 Tithe rentcharpe.

was a legs! obligation elisting between somebody and the tithe owner. The snhseetion said that this obligation should henceforth he borne by the owner of land notwithstanding any contract between him and the occupier of tho land, and that any contract made between an occupier and owner of land for the piyment.ol'the, tithe ronteharge. by the occupier should be void. The meaning of the subjection was that the only person to pay tithe ronteharge to the trie owner should be the owner ot the land. And in his opinion the subsection should be read as if the words to the tithe owner occurred after the words "payablo" and "payment.

That was to say, he would rcsd the subsection thus: "Tithe rentcharge, 4c, shall bo payable to the tithe owner by the owner of this UnJ. notwithstanding. Ac. and any contract mado bet ween an occupier and owner ot lands, after'tbe passing of this Act. for the payment to the tithe ow ner ot the tithe rentcharpe by the, occupier shall be void." In so construing the statute lie was not really adding words he.

was merely staling hat be understood the words to mean. The Lord Justice referred to certain consequences which in his. opinion would follow from the other construction oi trie statute ana saja.ne came to me conclusion that th? covenant in question Was a per fectly lcal contract and was not affected by section, li COUNCIL OF LEGAL EDUCATION. tank steamer Edward Dawson from XovorossuJt to" Botterdam. The Edward Dawson shipped the oil at and sailed on September, 1911 fcho went ashore near Flushing on October 1, and wnnin six hours thereafter tho od took flro and was destroyed.

Tho plaintiffs alleged that the Edward Uawson was when she left Novorossisk owing to defects in the boilers, that sho was driven ashore owing to want of steam arising from those defects, and tliat tho fire was caused by tho stranding and its confluence. Tho defeadants disputed thoeo allegations, and contended further that they wcrb proteclc i by section 50i of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1891. The fut question ho had to con MICHAELMAS EXipCATIOX LISTS. Tho following the result: of tho general examination ef students of Uio Inns of Court held in Cray's Inn Hall on Octolier 7. 8, 9, 10, and H.

L.I. means Lincoln's Inn, I.Tv Inner Temple, M.T. Jliddld Tcafple, and G.I. Gray's Inn: I10MAX LAW. Tho following students passed in Roman uiw Class I.

Henry Stephen Guy Buctmaster, I.T. Beginild Ernest Coleman, L.I. Maurice Dominic Dilv. M.T. FrancU Uarold Peako and John Andrew Graham Sterling, L.I.

Bobcrt Abercromby Yule, G.I. Cusa II. Percy James Bennett, Cyril Augustine Birtrhnell. Bryan Burton Buckley, Godfrey Davis, and Zafrulla Khan, L.I. Arthur Bertram Lucy.

G.I. ginald Cleg Maple and Arthur Silrrster Matthews, THE POLICE COURTS. CHARGE OF FORGERT. At Bow street yesterday, before Mr. Curtis Bennett, ftTAMXT Powts, 3, financier, and.

Jaicts BrsxE. variety artist, were charged oa remand with Ugn, M.T. Henry Thorna Morton I.T. Algernon Kenneth Hastings Neale and nagh Arthur Bobert Paulusx. M.T.

Bowland IliU Pngh, I.T. Madireddi Bamachendra Rao and Ghulam Kasul, L.I. Ernest Baron Reed. M.T. Arthur HaUam Roberts, Ernest liandlorth Goodman Roberts, and.

Frank Ronn teldt, I.T. Henry Alexander Bu.ssl, O.L Benoy endra Nath Seal. L.I. Gilbert Shuldham Shaw. I.T.

Charles Edward Shillington, OX; Teja Sinzh (Z). Edward Fox SUde. Maurice Smither, John Bwell M.T. Andrew Cecil Hrott Thom Potlethwait and being concerned together in obtaining a cheque booK iAurence Berkeley I.T. Tom ritoexnam hr means ot a lorgea requesi irom uoim TraTers.

Ercrard Xoel Bye Trentham. and Nand ifampstead. I'owys was abo farther charged en Bam Verma, L.I.; Alfred Coplestono Waldn Vin i remand with forging and uttering a cheque for cent, O.I. John Woodman and Uenrv Wcrsley J5 10: on the same bank and with uttering forged Worsley Gough, I.T.t Khwaja Gholim Yssin. andtrbenuo for tb payment ot 1.790.

purporting Robert Abercromby Yul G.I. 1 be drawn by Lord Roberta; The evidence in th The speeisl prize of 150 for the best examination latter case was reported in I A TinM of October 25. in Criminal Law and Procedure was not awarded. Evidence was now given that on October Examined, 185 passed. 111.

boy called at the Harapstead branch of LlovrU Bank with a cheoue for S7 9L on the London REAL PROPERTY AND COXVEYAXCLNG. I Jj gi, Western Bsnk. together with a not Tho following stents pa! ia Bral rro gJS perty and Conveyancing Later the san. day Powys sent another Cls I. CUrcnce Herbert Hart and Marie boy to tto same bank with a chequ for JS 1 Ferdinand rhilippe Herchenroder, M.T.

George purporting to be drawn by Miss Simthson. The. Arthur Hereford. L.I. Charles Louis John Holt, cashier observed that the cheque was made out O.I.

John Bernard Korantcng and Sydney Prcstoa. I the risth form of th book! be had issued earlier ia M.T. Cum llwniiam Henry Ambrose, G.I.: lump Detective inspector Tappendea saw inas ne utoti aider was whether thu ship was unscaworthy when sho left XovorosRbk. hMTjSS Twidell ir Uliam ulS torn from he bookjn quesUonJ Cussili WiHifIter aZuZL I Harold 1 Evcrard Dirkson. tJ.l.

Geoffrey Ecerton W.rbur prisoners were then fmt her charged with ArondeUmiih. il fVril lilt ti I n. I.T. Tiritbdxs Manchanmal Giani and BfJ i letter conUminff a cheque X14 ItXrt TcOowsn lUrriSL vSlT 1 Erie Ilie Gordon. M.T.

Newman I rortor Greig. frrm at. Tmse hUL Mr. Melntyre. who l)er UrTmgton 11.

Lnc ir.nn.r. r. I. PhiliD rn.tmr General In this ease. Mtnckian'l llcrtrnsliaw.

M.T. William orao vT' .1 lintion. l.i. i luiani uinr. weoiKe jiowcn.

ana rrancis papier uroomr, rTr.n rnrtw I.T. John ItumM l.i. til ttm TT.v Clam III. arain Ahuja and Henry i orhes JJyme, I.T. Begmalil Coleman.

M.T. Mervyn Angn.1. I.T. Baij Nath Badhwar, Bama Shanlar AlWrt Maurice DaVies. I.T.

Anil Krishna Deb. 11. "jff JiPJZ2? TT.n V. nlla! Georgo 1 Carteret, tieorgw Art hurt i i' vt HirVt T. Jsorenaracain dlis Ijordshin then reviewed at lencth the evidence upon this question, and came to the conclusion that the vessel was nnseaworthr when she left Jfovo nrik by reason of the defect's in her boilers.

He further found. that the stramliiu? was ruiwl bv want of steam which was. cauwTby tho umwawortlry of tho lwiWj and also that the stranding was wie.cu!cuvc cautto ot the l.xj ol the lon7Jne. 11U. fa con Mdering'the effect of section 502 of tho rchnt Shipping Act.

18P4. mid it had wen decided in Vinrinia Cunliiia Chemiral v. Norfolk and South American Steamship Company (28 The Times Law Boports.83 1 7 Com. that the 15 nuinuuuy given oy tost section applied even tnousn tho fire was caused by thn ship tcing unaeaworthy, but tho section itsefl provided that the immunity was not, given unless tho loss happened without the fault or privity of tho owner; lie thought it might bo right to say that it was the flro that must happen without the fault or privity of the.oirners. As he hail found that tho tire was caused by the ho had to sen whether the unseaworthiness was caused without the fault of tho owners.

It could not truly be said that the liro was caused without the fault, ot the owners if tho nnsea worthiness was caused by their fault. Tho duty of supervision Tcmatncd with tho managing owners. Tire Owners' Duty. What was the degree of care which the owners must take in carrying out tho duty of seeing that the ship was seaworthy? In his opinion ho Ought to apply a high sUndard. to this duty.

If a ship was allowed to go to svi in an unfit stato gravo conse quences followed. The lives of many men were at stake, and very valuable property. Tho utmost care must be taken and tho duty must bo fulfilled most thoroughly. Was it so fulfilled in thia'caso In view of the history of tho veiwl, he thought Frederick St hnot tcnwirk. and Solrmion 1 ord.

I.T. I William Jnnondr Molian Ghcse. 11. Henry Uarcourt and I SlSJxL cL A1fpl r.r..m ii mt r.K.:i i tk i A ilhcrforce Buxton. I.

T. Hcrtert James Capon. G.I. Marmaduke I ncdl Horn. Muhummud Hiisain.

M.T. Mark Johannes, i ilA T. IUnwant Kir Sinjh Chhachhi. L. I.

BcginAld rnesL it MnAgu Ouer. I. T. Herbert Charles Fhi Cox. Vithal Dhondo Kale.

Shafaat Ahmad Ktan. J1" lu.h John hrlo Mrnilel Ivohsn. I.T. llih.iri Lall. L.I.

Edward William The magistrate cow 3J AlhU Eugene de' la 'pcnLri. Louis de tion of the prisoner. I.T. 8yed AbduUiid hZ.Jvr. I The Inv, S1 1' 1.

Donald Islio Finnemore. I. Hubert Cecil At Guildhall, before vt. Wn tL'u iUJi 0w. Maik Chandra Ghos and Phiroz Dorabji THoaixa Isaac StQcn M.T.: Ldiu 1lfo rickett, Ul.

uwrwanjee ormAn ErnP.t Jasrvr rnmerr Ward, ot v.v.,"i. i.7i. i UocHrey lzarrt. M. l.i Jrinur iecu tture squire, uisnopogaie hrikrishna Venkatesh Iuntmbekar.

ll. Erie. j.ii. I. John Lees 1 its vi.vi.i ohtaini br ana iliiam Ilereward Hollo, I.T.

Itepinald TaI tw'v. T.t 5fAhomed I T.ritL HaKsfanrr. lnr rTet f.15 i'irtshuldham Shaw and Eldon Ilookbdgo SiddaU. i Mral.i Kohan. I.

T. defraud. Mr. Waiter Kochunni Kurup and Shearman, jun asnt that the letter in was found at the hou e.t one of tho prisoners. Tbw cheque was cashed bT; rowy, and part oi tne piocceus nsa Kta Bcrke.

Xhe prisoners were again remanded. Alleged Cheating at Cards. At the same Conrt Ebmcxd 'iexeiu. a pensioned lieutenant of the Germany Arrnv, was again brought up for eitradition on the charge ot being concerned in obtaining moner by Wse pretences in Germany. The rase, was reported Une Tim of September 11 and October IB.

mide.an order lor the eiuiai Irivestors Rccard." AMerman Sir John Baddeley, Appleto. otherwise Mont Devonshire buildings. Devon was charged on remand false nretences from David terrace. Teignmonth. cheques" respect ive It.

with intent to Fnmston and Mr. Montsruo were lor tne prosecuuon. io" r.IUU, f.rr.TJ Mil, tZlL UTi Thelapurath Krishna Kurup. O. I.

Jindr Mohan accused, who was undefended, was stated to be the Archibald Ivinson; nmnrietor of a finanrUl journal called the lnstttonf r.H Vff wti 1 Humphrey Gilbert MachU. and Isher Das Madhok. ftrW, which had a very brief career. The previous and Frank achelU M.TP: barada i Alfred Kdvanlrhrin7wu rroorted in The Times ot October 26. i 5 i M.

TGeoffrr O. I. Sydney Henry Frederick Pennells. ot Braysbrookeroad. Hastings.

vjr vnalal Chamanlal MehU and nHr Ifcginald Taffs and Fir Tajuddin. 11. John Cockburn jesMop league Prasad A'Urrna. Francis Awoonor WUs and John Woodman. I.T.

John Loftus Wright. M.T. Examined, 148; passed, 81. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND LEGAL HISTORY. The following students passed in Constitutional Law" (English and Colonial) and Legal Ilistory Class I.

Henry Allan Fagan. M.T. TVmald Leslie Finnemore, I.T. Walter Stryker Lloyd. Richard O'Mullivan, lUniit, Sitaram Pandit, and Charles Oordon Spry, M.T.

ITA8S 11. Kustaee ictor Adams, Clarence Allschrook, and Henry Forbes Angus', I.T. Merwanji jamsiiedii Anna, li.l. Kama.ihanltar liajpai, 11 rubsection I. of the ct.

He thought that the that any reasonable man would know that the vessel's boilers could not last long, and that, at Any moment further weakness might develop. Special instrue urcwoa in uwt.v viuuicu in im uiv ui uiui Ludlow v. Fike was wrong, and that this Appeal I i ions snouiu nave pcen given 10 in captain ana juui engineer to report from each rort as to how the favour of dismissing the appeal. Solicitors. rcrceval A.

Xairne; Harwood and rosey. McQuown. ft T. N'anaJal Chamanlal MehU and printer, now stated that be had printed en numbers Herbert Metcalfe. G.

I. Walter Llewellyn Steele altogether of the lrnntortf Record. The total of tho Mitchell. Henry Crawford Mitchell Dawson, and Syed wiUv printing account was 73 9s. rJ.

in respect Mohiuddin, L. Henrv Thorne Morton. I. T. of this he received 20 and a dishonoured cheque for Rod crick John Mules, M.

T. Geoffrey Eugene Oates, 10. O. James O'Connor (No. 2).

M. Athipedn Geom William Pearce. a messenger of the Bank I la ah Venoogopaut Fillai. I Bonald Arthur' ruptcy Conrt. gave evidence that In 190 the eeeneed Powell.

M. T. Mordecai Julius Birhard Pratt, O. I. was adjudicated a bankrupt.

He had not applied Bowland Hill Pugh, I. T. Edupueanty Bagha for his" discharge. venars. Ran.

L. Oswald Theodore Kavner. I. T.tt Sir John Baddeley committed the accused tor Philip Bead and Nowell Kiehardson. M.

T. Francis John Rigby. I. T. Saiyid Haidar Biia.

M. T. John Hamlet fiheiton ltoliens. rranx nonnieiui, ana Harold Fehrsen Sampson. I.

T. David Duke Sassoon. L. I. Hem Chandra Satpathi.

O. I. Sriv Bam Sawhnv, I. Arthur Frederick Sharpos, O. Edward Herbert Simpson.

M. Lath Singh G. I. Edward Bawdon Smith and Samuel Harold trial, releasing him on his own recognizances. LAW NOTICES.

Xov. 2. COCET OF APPEAL. TITHE. RE NT CHAR GE.

LESSEE'S COVENANT. TTFF r. MASTERS. Ac. OF THE GUILD OF DRAPERS OF THE CITY OF LOSDOX.

fKrfcnr IiOKD JcrrrcE Vacghas Wiixjajis, Lord Etcturr, and Lorx JrtTicx Kxnxedt.) Tnis was an appeal by the defendants from a judg ramt of Mr. Justice Bray. The plaintiff's ilaim for the sum ot 191. lpng the balance due from the defendants to the jAinti3 as executrix of the will of Charles Tuff, Vra ed. under or by virtue of an inventory and val ation, dated September 33, 1911, ot the tenant' right and effects on Church Farm, in the parish cf Aiihaiiowr, in the county ot Kent, and made by Msters.

and Freeman, as valuers for and os bhalf of the plaintiff, and Messrs'. II. and H. for and en' behalf ot the defendants, whereby the mi ot 976 was found to be payable by the boilers had behaved, and if further svenkness de veloped have the boilers carefully examined by some competent independent "person. It would not be sufficient to leavn everything to the discretion ot tne captain and chief engineer.

No special instructions were given. None ot the mina.Dg. owners had been called, and ho svas told that the directors' minute book contained nothing on tha subject. There were no documents giving any information or explanation, and in the absence ot any explanation be must come to tho conclusion that the managing owners had failed in their duty if they had done what they ought to have done narady, insisted on having the. fullest information given to them of the liehaviour of the boilers they would have learnt that tho ship wan unseaworthv.

Ho found, therefore, that the cargo was not lost without their fault, but by their fault. The dnfendanta were therefore not ntitled to the protection pven HIGH COURT OF KING'S BENCH DIVISION. NOTICE OF APPEAL. NON SERVICE. WILLS AND SONS v.

McSHERBY AND OTHERS. (Before the Lono Cntrr JrsTtcj England. Mb. Jrsrici: CnAXSEii, and Mb. Jfetice Avoht.) This was an appeal by way of case stated from a decision, of the Southampton Justices awarding nmnnilmii' e.tni.

1 bv section 50J of the Merchant Shipping Art. 1894, prehmWrt was taken that, as; the pondents ThcL ua not oecn srrrcu wim.nuuw i fuji nu 0f dsm. wx hn undrrstocl. to determined copies of the case nndcr section of the Summary tf Th plaintills would have tha cost Jurisdiction Act, 18.57, the Court; had ho jurisdiction of tho action up to now. to hear the appeal.

Solicitors. Parker, tJarretl, and Co. Downing, 3lr. Racbm appeared for. the appellant; the nndcc k.

Middlelon.and lwis, for BoUm, iliddlc respondents were not represented. Co Sumlerland. It appcered that scvcrel of the respondents, were ecamen. were foreigners. Various efforts WtOBATE, DIVOR6E.

AND ADMIRALTY (which were enumerated in the affidavit of the appel I.T. stone son MnKAmnl Vnsuf. M. T. Examined, 1 S3 passed.

1 18. HINDU AND MAHOlLEDAN LAW. Lul.i WcrVracn'l Canvcvstiii) Apcral (TaUsM v. the pwoers of the Shtp (UHtl. Appeal.

Sot txic 10. rrrmtbm lUaTs Beach Dlt.toiv I Baskropwyi. Tew Heaitr. F.twui i.t (ru Edwla r.nnm v. Oscar Benr.

tht Trnstcel. e. 1.0U! el IC08I lil. rrt tmrf. Pefore Losr Jctnca Vicohi wnxiAxs.

itmB Jrvnrn Hcmse of Lords. Joseph Brennan and Francis Nspier Broome. I.T.; Smith I Bobert Norman Store. M. T.

Olafi tTts wisfi rs. THr. Tin iiulrr. raTMforMeAr.sTo Mohamad Bacl AMul Cader, MT. JCl'tt Ado tmeTClcndes, O.L; Alexander Moncneff Coutanche, cberkar.

James Douglas Thomas, and Trevor Mere UJC MO AV XfAnneal M.T.: Margaldas Vithaldas Desar and Savaksha ah Chitt Thomas, M. T. Evcrard Noel Rye Court, of Appeal. DhuniLsha Dhondv. L.I.: William Everard Dickson t.

Pv.nV Vachelt. M. T. IUmzanali Ttm Xht rrr of tfee Kcua. losn Jrjrics Jrswwwtx ana irihn.

vne. i i i. rl inuooni. jirjiuxj ijmnara i.ounenay iianjiays. inancs jxtuis John Holt, and Thelspurnth Krishria Kurup, 0.1.

Wilfrid Max Lnngdon ond Neville, Jonas Laki, I.T. KotreddigJri Kotl 1'eddv' and Saiyid naidar Biia. M.T. Ugra Sen.TuI.: Samuel Harold Smith. Man.k.hah Taleyarkhan.

L.I. Hugh Nevillo Adam Taylor. G.L Joseph. TheirannnThonon, M.T. Charles William Venning, Class III.

William Augustus Adam and Walter Sibhald Adie, I.T.'; Syed Sayeed Ahmad, M.T. Sheikh Noor Ahmed, L.L Sved Aneesuddin Ahmed ami Tyab Ali William Tiry Ambrose and George'' Thomas Apps, G.L; Sa.i&h Chandra Xinar, William Gorman Birkett, I.T.; Cyril Augustino Birtrhnell. L.I. James Hodfrson Bowe, I.T. Arthur Tom John BrowrG.L Hoy Evana Jlullen.

Harold Malcolm Bullock. Fobcrt Erie Burrell. Cecil Oliver Ualgh Bury, and Krfc wth James Camp hell, I.T. Kenneth Sydney Carpm Ifl and Sagar Chand, M.T. Edmund Hubert ChenalMy, O.I.

5 Shapurji Manehcrshaw Chothla, M.T. Krginald Montagu Cluer, I.T. Richard Markham K)te, L.I. nenry Kirkpatrlck Damant, I.T.J Saiyid Uhulara Dastgtr, I I. UemcPtA Kumar Do, ti.L Anil Krishna Deb, L.I.

Shankar Fandurang Desal and Baddi palle Nagappa Vijaya Deva, (I.I. John William Duunty and Walter nenry Freke Evans. M.T. IUsil Arbuthnot ten wick, (Jharlcs r.rnest von Fleisch'l. and Alfred Edward Cyril Franklin.

I.T. Charles Gandy. M.T. John Wildinc Arundel Genre and frowns (itiosh. JUL; William Jlicnael Unt's were made to ascertain their whereabouts, bnt all tailed exorpt in the case of the iioii dent McShcrry, Notice had been served on the solicitor who acted for the respondents at the Police Court, who liad stated that her had.

no instructions from them Sn the appeal, but was still instructed to forward Uiem the money due under the judgment ceidazts to the plaintiff executrix of 'the will el I arl Tuff, deceased. The balance ot 534 was i Mr. itAcsrnx contended that where the perform arn at bv deducting Irom 9.6, being the amount 1 ance of something'was a condition valuation, half vear's rent due on September Court havioc jurisdiction to hear nn appeal, where the plaintiff, to the defendants, namelv, such icrformauro was impossible, it ri to bo taken I uA compensation for dilapidations as agreed. performed. It was impossible to find the respn i dents.

so as to serve. them, although" rnewt. exbavtivc I steps had en taken in tle.cnd avour to do to. Iw Bcpo'ts, ir dcfen said that they were I steps had cen taken in lie. endeavour to do to lOd, being the amount He cited Andersen v.

BHd The Tinf Iw Bcpo'ts ion November 1911, for'4G3): Woodhouse v. Wood i CO M.C.. 143): rsrt of the bereditanients I Svre v. Carrr.hl (K. H.

and 40V); I 'omi defendants bsA.their defence said that they were stepi i to trt off 99 IV defendants harge in respect I. enti era I bv 'tb lease of the Church Farm dated IQW 2 K.B 105); Edwards v. Roberts 1S91 Hare. i which contained a covenant by the a jt to the defendants all sum. of money paid il for tithe or tith rentcharpe and the laot.s fnrtlHTRaid that tley had paid the sum ot i 434 into t'onrt and that that sutrl was enough s1 1 the plaintiff Uim.

By their counterclaim 1 i Vuiiants akrd to liave the lease rectified. DIVISION. ACRBED DAMAGES 500. BEECH ING v. BEECIUXG AND TAYLOR.

Before Mb. Jrsncn BAncuvi: Dkaxe and a Common Jury.) This was the petition of Henry Dallas for the dissolution his marriage with Mabel Boceh inir. iihiwi maiden name was Addr. on the cround of Harkaran Nath Misra. I.T.

Jehanglr Ksikhoshru trre fle ncrform n. i i i i precedent to the "er adulter) with the co respondent JUroi.t Tl, fllrr, rfnrlentii nassfrf in Hindu and 1, VZ Vil" iU i rii in in Chancery Division. (rmn rVcTCTUS CjOtT. IVfol ilS. JCSTWW JOTOC.

At e.ao: Tttw (or Trtai twlta irnrsws.) naOLsasa vajt i3s ir.Trl, Mahomcdaa Law: Class I. No award. Class II. Arthur Fasten Kindersler. L.I Class III.

Sheikh Ghtilam Ahmad and Syi Anwaruddin Ahmed. M.T.; Duriscty Appa Bao and Ssrat Chandra Bose, L.I. Shapnrji Manehcrshaw Chothia and Naravan Iialaii Nagarkar. M.T.: Rajah Manoor Ventata Heshacnciapaii l' ao. inane soamwiwu.

Muxixtur iwtnci Gerrdon rtpencer, ana Ivaiiaausro iay arkhan. L.I. 19; pa3ed, 10. FINAL EXAMINATION1. The following have passed the final examination CtM I.

(In order of merit). Arrhibald Henry Reginald Primrose and Hubert Allan Rose, I.T. Makauji Jutha Mehta. and Nanabhoy normasji ir Ti.4 fhrrf Hrfmm M. JnTTTCX At IS Is 0i a lameets).

the Thanus Inmworts. BUpMildtn. sixl Enctoeoln t1. SLttLl IFsrrer v. tl Comeasr.

Chamber iotp II sa4 sooUatr v. Mwa aodsUrr Ba. Dnits wh cm ll nd wmoUkt. Intuit the Trotsnf Jh Will ot Wlluua fartT. iteomied Ke the Trot Act.

IMS In Otsirt rrta Aprheattoas. MaaebcstcT sod LiTerpool Clatrlet lUfitiA. Jtloos. 1 Kini's Bench DivUion. L9si Cmr Jiwncnl Cocrr.

DtrliHonsl Court. Befm Um Lou CsntF Jnrncr. Ms. Jcrnca Cimui, and M. Jorcs aro.T it 10JO Kor Judnaenl.

Vr Guardian awmso! tJi. Paper. William, v. Major, a e. ol" Hen llam lli Ur Trkr sod snrthrr l4 Tb v.

Canoa Srtirru. Em. i7 Kefshaw smlta sut Co. insx. Moos.

M.T. (Mr. Mha and Mr. Moos Charles Jff? Iouis John Holt, CI. Altrt Edwin Sockett, L.I.

55cVr FiUberbert' John Osbourne. fieoffrev Keith Rose. I.T. Week endluc Smmbtt a. Ioudar Trldarv Ex part Coddington.

and At 10.30 Xurle. UHn. LUliBaon W30 Morrlso Tchmuras Kavasji v. M.w rcm 2l Gibbons. I.T.

Colin Macdor.ald Gilray and Henry Modi. L.I. Amafruvndhu Guha, M.T. SaUV's order XIV Kole s. sadtri Uarcourt.

M.T. Herman Paul Heimann. I.T, Charles Hcllyer Iloilgc. Q.L; Cyril Julian noffnung Golilfmid, Valentino Holmes, and. Lancelot Frederick Scott Honey.

I.T. Patrick Joseph Hooper, (i.I. Diwan Chand Jalli. L.L; Biehard Busk James and Herbert Felix Jolowiex, I.T..; Mahomed Afaq Kh in, Jl.T. IShafaat.

Ahmad Ktian, I.T. Kashinath Lahlry, M.T. Frclerlck Davi.l Iicvy, I.T.; Cheng I 'jin Lim. L.I. A u.st in Charles Ijongland, I.T.

Biehanl Robert Ludlow, G.L Dalrympje Msltland and Reginald Clegg Maples, I.T. Rudolph Max Mayer, and John attcrson Jliller. M.T, Jisrww ncsenaok It Ht.Mi i v. lientiaaae ii3HhSm v. Prssl Taylor, against whom there, was a claim for elamagfa.

3Ir. Hume Williams, Mr. Moran, and Mr, W. A. Wardlcy appeared for the petitioner; and Mr, nanara A.ajum.iar, u.s.

't TlWSrVAs, Jrsncr ncatrr. At Ctornmra of Honour). Jv Jirlaoa T. Bflttsi Jlolof Ct La. LUdJ and oiixrw lliMl.

Class II. (in order of merit). Cinynra Saryansra i v. vanaran. Bhasker.

L.1. Alfre.1 Christopher Gloria. Ti Vasstt. IfT. LT.t Walter Alfred John O'Meara.

I.T and Dhian ttSKT Singh. M.T. (Mr. O'Meara. and Mri Singh equal) reTills4 Heart v.

Jtowtey awl fern itlMV Baier v. rnjur Jamcs. Campbell MaeNeUlie Narayanaswami Swaininatha Alyer, O.L; Richard Stanley arley, Jurirs flsrt KemtdT's PNWiln and Charles Hugo Ziegler, I.T. Cecil Stuart Emden. md.

t. bewermui tl41i lsy IM.O.C. (Ud. tlWJj Emmanuel harle, Quist. and Chan M.T.

iJfr57l' Harrv Herbert Trusted. I.T. Ladha Bam Anand. u5Si UJl D.v.Wtll O.L, and Obalam LakshmanaswsTru, 11. (Mr.

Anand i jwk vilin t. JM'arthT HWh Burt swl snothrr t. Wfclt snd Mr. iAkshmanaswarai equal) nenry Webster i ona ri OaUt mW. Mimshi, M.T.

Gorakhnath Sakbtram Matthews anil Christopher Herbert Counscll, I.T. iSBtisi Lit. 'nrrtt casts kit indlmostd o( la tiidai's L.I. Sidney Nacgiar, I.T. Shah Moliamm.nl N.imii 1 Kailendnt Nath Datta.

G.I. Raymond Bcvir. I.T. ui.wiueh wUl take prtxrdeiice. tulLih and Nathan Paul Nussbauni; M.T.; Milki I Ala Icslie, M.T.

Wilfrid Max Langdon. I.T.. and i oh. Divorce, and Admiralty Division. mra unn, hi.

i nonius wrr, .11.1. imam iioncri jonn junaries aiwunwc ivoyn 11. i.ur. rmm lfn Kim i n. Vtits.

frol Fiddes Osmond. Leo Francis lto. Gonnc St. CLiir Mr iil cntialt Francis John IUchv. I.T.

Bat ZZVttZA J. Harvey Murphy for the corrimtident. Tlia re ldileher. and James Douglas Tort cr, I.T. Sii l'rakasa, want Sinzh Ilhandari.

L.I. William Hamilton Lee 1 i rner c' S. Kerbei Ownttn t. ftgx rt Tha spondeul waa not represented, and tlie suit was now ifl.L; Bisheshwarl Vrasad, I.T. Mordecai Julius Warner, M.T.

Syed Ryaz ud Din Ahmad, L.I. in 'Tic'efrrmbne. Aiabittt t. 1. ,1.1.

CLASS 111. I in aipnaoeucaa oraeri. uaniei TJASKKCl rCY. At r.anHrnptrf.bullco. CWT Ufet LIB art undefended one, the danuiges having been agreesl at I Evidence in tuppeirt of the petition having I lcn the Jury found Hut the co respondent I Q.B., and Morgan v.Fdward (5 H.

and committed adultery with the respondent, and J. UsserciX the damigus at the agroea sum 01 JfWJUKVB. said that he thought they ought to hear the appeal. in Anderson v. Rcid (supra) they did iktiff bv hrr rer.lv pleaded that if she ever 1 not give their reasons; but he lad no doubt that Tet a to pay any sum for tithe ronteharge, which she their decision was on the ground that tho appellant The Lorp Cinrr fsncK.

In giving Judgment, tbc respondent tad. 'committed adultery with the admit. Mxh agreement was voi i under the provwon the Titbc. Aa. lbOl.

TL kae ctained the' folleing clauses: 'And alM jifltling and paying unto the fraternity ea'tV ouarUr day next following the day in every tb kvl Uxm on which the fame shall be iaid fii iv "the fraternity such further rnJlk all titri or tithe rentcha'rge peoiiUr. features, and Mr. Justice Channcll had ex ot rp or otlier payment in lieu ot tithe without pressed a strong view as to whether the justices had iu, uon whatsoever. Ana me iwe the power to state a case si. an, ue respondent.

in that case had done everything he could do to serve 1 the respondent and to comply with the statute. I He said this because he had read the cases which were then cited before the Court. Nb.doubl the case ot Foss v. Best (tupra) was a decision contrary to the above View. That case, however, had several covenant and atne with the fraternity that.be shall and will during the said term ti.i trulv pay or cause to lc paid unto the fra tertiv the said yearly and other hereby re ejv stithot any deduction whatsoever cxcejit rcopertvtaxontherentreM rvrv.

By teru.n culction I. of the Tittie Act. .191, prwidrd as follows Tithe rente hrge as ty thu, issuing out cf any lands slull be IysU t'y tJ. owner of the lands, notwithstanding tjttween him and the occupier ot such liavin? been acoilitted bv them. The facts which induced the Syred Gar rdl hers (tvpra) to hear the appeal, except that co respondent, 'pronounced a decree risi cost and cutol) directed tliat the damages should be paid into Court within 1 4 days after service.

Solicitors. He)er and Becching. mrnani i ran. 1 jtowutnu inn 1 uii. 1.1 UL.VSS ill.

im wpniiDw orurn. ujnii i tt AN KKCl rCY. txirj utrtt Lm Kl.rit ri.hn. Wnllwh PnnHmMi. nH IM.nnll, 1 ..,1 nM.nM i.1 ATlvnltx.

1 prlnm Ml. krilltlll HurOIlH At Harcharndas 11. Kenneth lUikc. i M.T. John Muscrave AcUnd.

L.I. LKmard Harry IS Psne. (B.lc' "SSSUSi ll'LdlSSSI LT.t Ediipuganty ltaghaven lra Rao and C.hulam Adams and Iran Nath Aga, M.T. Moham I Ahmad, oiT. iJIki" Basul, 11.

Arthur H.ilkun Hoherts. Ernest Hand 1 11. Syed Manzoor Vhrnad. O.I. Syed Anwaruddin T' i1T7h.

in. iniuK Surfc tr I.W.I Nr taller Thomas Stuart 1 I.T. Habib Ashrat and Placido Maclean Adeyemo pninaic rwl wuttWea Bnekwoiks a.tt.)K W. i ir. Hu Sett fcwn Murine.

JtrTKB Banerjee, G.I. Cyril Ernest Orlando Iid'J Mb. cstick Rart.eavk Dean having found tliat William Gordon Ress. I.T. Ardehir lVstonji Saba I jjir Amlruddin, L.I.

DcnU Georgw William Anson, TIIE EASTBOURNE MURDER. At llie Eastbourne Tolice Court yestenlay tho man who gives the name of John Williams was charged on remand with murdering Police inspector Walb by shcioting him on South CHU arcnuo on dctoben)9. Mr. Harohl Glcnister, seilicilor, staled that he was th Ksnnnrlmt in that ease was in fact served after instructed for the defence and intimated tint tho the exniration of the time for service, were the i defence would involve inquiries in Eastbourne. Mn.

Justice Chavxeli. said he was willing to In Foss v. Best there were grounds upon which he was prepared to deride, tho case on the second point, nanrfelyv the power of the justices to state the case, and not much attention was given to the first point. Ma. JcsncF.

Avokt gave judgment to the same effect Solicitors. Rawle, Johnstone, and for Hill, Dickinson, and Li vcrpool. same as "in the preser.t case, and to his mind, were somewhat stronger. ro oouui tney ntt Anderson v. Rcid (vupro) deciding one way and Fofs v.

Ilcst Itupm) another way. But the tacts in (be present case wcre'st least as strong as (hope in Syred v. I'AmilliMs where the Court heard the anneal ie4i. Anlr.mcl. made between an nrrunifr i nw 1..1 ticn in to serve the resoonoivntji.

nd OTvr cif'lands, after the parsing ot this. Act, arid the soli'itor, who was still intruded by them theoocupier for some purposes in the case, had been served; void. By tubsoction Where tne therefore he thought they oupht to hear the appeal, "VtrrK 'uM' nndcr any contract msoe ueiore tne Juir of this to pay the tithe rentrharge. then thaU ecav to tie. bound by that part of his contract, a hali )e liable to pay to the owner such sum bar jrope rly paid on account of the tithe hirpr which such occupier is liable under his said eoKtract, to pay, exclusive of any costs incurred or pi4 bv the owner in repcct ot turh tithe rent It Was admitted at the trial that the case was ectiudd in favour of the plaintift jby the decision Mr.

Juktios Channcll in Lord Jidlow v. Pike I K.B. i3l). Mr. Justice Bray accordingly 'flered judgment to be entered for the plaintift tor cpm'ttve claim and counterclaim.

1 1 ddfiiluit, appealed. Jlr J. R. Atkin, K.C and Mr. Courthope Munroc yparcd for the defendants and Mr.

Schiller and Dot PowcU for (be plaintiff. The Cot kT elismiabed the appeal, LOBO JcsnCE BctKiET dissenting. CDC ME3T. Jcenrx VccHaj( Wiixiams said the 1etion was whether a part of the contract contained in Uie lease in this case was void by reason of the "visions of the Tithe Act, 1891. nis Lordship read troa the lease the clauses above set out.

It teemed to him that really the only question which arose was whether aection 1, subsection I. ot the Tithe Aci, dealt merelr with the mode ot collecting tithe nieharjT, or whether it dealt with the incidence of the burden ot tithe renteharge. vj'mikjii iv aeaiv wiw lira iduiul. i uic not merely with the mode ot collection. fJ words of the section were, "Tithe rentcharge PabW by the owner of the lands." It was pointed uat the words seers not ParaUe only by the "mcr ot tho landi," and it was mtfodrd that.

Actibcrtox V. Docolas. The name of the one ot the defendants referred to in the report of this case in The Time of yesterday, should have been illiam iocton, oi urcav juariDorougu W. Solicitous" Miscoxdcct. The name of tho anliritor referred to in the report under this heading in The Time ot October 30 relating to a suspension from practice for one year soouia cave been James Herbert uooic Wateb Summoned.

At the Kingston County Bench the Metropolitan Water Board at the instance ot tho Walton on Thames Urban District Council for the non navment of 665 1 9s. 6d claimed as due on the current generaj district rate. The magistrates made an ntder for tboAVater Board to pay 200 on account. and adjourned the summons pending the result ot an appeal against the assessment ot ut uoaro. REPORTS OP COMMERCIAL CASES.

About six numbers of Commercial Cases are issued from The Times Office during the year. Price Ss. 6d each coo v. or IS, per annum. PartVI, VoLXVIL (September, 1912), is KOW READY, and can obtained from tha Publisher, Tsx TotES Office, nrfniTT, JCGL Tho prifonrr November 6.

was remanded till Wednesday, THE ADJOURNED INQCEST. At the adjourned inquest, which was held id the afternoon at the Town nail, on the body of POLICE ls srECTOK Waixs, Williams tody. Mr. S. I'earce again appeared on behalf of the' Director of Public Prosecutions; and Mr.

Gleniatcr represented the prisoner, lim couo.VEn, Dr. G. Vcre Benson, said tliat tne use ot cameras in Court would not be allowed. Any one bringing thrnj into Court would be requested to and tho cameras would be detained. vata.

M.T.J Mohamcd Sadiq, G.I. r.mucr.M.iii, l.i. nuwi iiwu rru ii. l.l.l xn i.n. a Ms JlCE NcTtu s'sCasmbrTf A VD Daya Shankar, O.L Khem Singh.

11.: Teja Singh Sajani Ranjan Bapdyopadhyay. and Bobindra Nath jJf'Mier Joset'h twaj h.a 7ix. At "to il.v; laneriec, u.i. t.yru lirnest tirianno iax, i.i. simmppm.

it il upui uw sww (2). M.T. Charles Gordon Spencer, 11. Ernest Itkhard stow, M.T. Charles Regirwld Taffs.

L.I. John Ceiekburn Jessop Tcaguc, M.T.J 'Laurence. Berkeley Tillanl, I.T, I John Vernon Timmis. G.I.J BUvant Krishnarao Wftgle, L.I. Alfred Coplestone Walden Vincent, Mohammad Waliulhuq and Clarence Campbell Whadcoaf.

I.T. Francis Awoonor Williams and Walter Anwyl Willington, 0.1. Sydenham Waldie Wills, LT.t Georee Witt, O.L; Hugh MrKinnon Wood, Gordon SUJlord Wexvlhou.se, and John Woexlman, I.T. Thomas Worswlck and Khwaji Ghobm Tasin, O.L The special pnte ot iftn (or the test examination In Constitutional Law (English and Colonial! and 1 Octavius Hall and Robert John Hayfron. ALT.

Raghbir Singh Budhraja and D.tvid rtrick i iST uSei At i Kc. copper Mims Chalmers. M.T. Eilwant nenrr Collins. O.I.

i (sZLm (LtU r. I Cm C.rf.M Ilium, T. HiTWOrxll. ML JCTTICS tn a tV tf wiisSrr.V.s'it Mi. J.

tries P.xra Cnaml.ra. A to D. M.T. Nirmal Chandra Datta, L.I. iluam Uender I liUta WaUlu wuiianK.

Hxa ii At 11 to 1 Adams sod Davison, M.T. Anant Bam Diwan. L.L Alfred t.Gom. Noel poorly. M.T.

Archibald 'Campb ll DougUs, Justice thU dsrMarter. L.I. Edward Tcrrival Doyle. M.T. Hector Living lllj.

smith. vl l(up( stone Duff, I.T. Frederick John Eat, M.T. David Mun rt nr. umti lttis thu day.

Muter Ker Solomon Erulkar. 11. Tirithdws 1 ReeWOT GUni and Arthur Samuel Gibhe. M.T. Phiroz Airi Cwitt tir ilrMll: Dorabji GorwalU.

ILj Stuart Montagu Green. I.T. nair.JntlceJrre.Xr.KWtrtian Igal' History was divided between Donald Leslie iperccval Mills Cobham Uayman. I.T. Peter Iligson jJikeMW.

Mb Jlccbtnr ChurdJi Jlr. Jwtice Zn. Finnemore, I.T.. and Richard O'SulIiyao. M.T.

Examined, 221 passed, HO. 'and Vyvyan Beresford Holland. L.I. Cyril Noel i ji, ttiU'rar fsnoer. Hooper.

Syetl Husain, and James Ilannerman I 110. Caxtoo HaD. Wtstmlnster. At CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE. aVaudu.AtrMohameil Jan, and Basil Hcnrv John i laM Tho follovinc students passed in Criminal son.

11. Edsar Rees Jones, q.I. jKeki Maneckji iw and rroccelurci Ksrbhari, I.T.; namsnaa vnimuj nnan. ji. i.

Abu snarl jiunammaa lAiuur imnnua, i.i. Robert Henry LSge, M.T, Elward Vlbcrt Lessing, l.T. Maiti, oerliardiu Jacobus Marttz, inurnment air. 1 carer. iue oniy a month's adjournment near to tho date oi the fortnight.

Mr. Glenitcr presumed that tiefore the date of tho Assizes the Policn Court proceedings would have been closed. He did think any inconvenience would bo caused by tho tact that thu inquest had not concluded. The Coroner. Why should I keep this Inquest open longer tha'n tho Polico Court proceedings In answer teethe Coroner, it was stated that the Sussex Assizes would begin at Lewes on December 10, and eventually the inquest was adjourned, until Wednesday, November 20.

Law and Procedure Ciabs Brajendra Nath George Witt, G.I. Class II. Alfred Frederick Allen, John Edgar Baker, and Philip Ridceway Bennett, M.T. Robert was nrevnt in eii I Croft Bourne. 11.

Jsmes Bevan Bowen, O.I. w.is present in cus .11, v.a c.n. ghan, M.T.; William Collingridge, G.I.t Godfrey Davis, Donald Leslie I.T. Arthur Foster, G.L; 'Bradford Leslie Gordon, M.T. rcrcy Stewart Pcache Ilandcoek and Arthur Gould Remington Ilickes, I.T.

Charles Louis' John Holt, 0I.j Taliat Varkey' Joseph and Edward William Lambert, M.T. uilip Aislabio and wiurid Max jtitcneii uawson. Arthur Trevor GAMING AT CORFU. Mr. Glenbur applied to be allowed as l6ng an "'i; rli vit, djournment Ulble.

Ue suggested an sd ftnfon. rwfort M.b Mimmrni lor a rnouui. vf.i..i. i r. u.i,.

t7is ffit VouM tS ery RhyeTc Samuel Harold Smith. I.T. Assix wuwVugjn Charl ordon Spencer L.I. Nai Damrong Tuan THE AUTUMN ASSIZES. The following further list of days' and places appointed far' holding the Autumn Assizes." 1912, is gazetted Midland Cnuxrr.

Mr. Justice Ridley and Mr. Justice Scrutton. Saturday. November 30, at Birmingham, civil and cnmlnai.

4 NoRTn EASTEEN CrscciT. Mr. Justice PicUord and Mr. Justice Bailhache. Monday 4, at Newcastle, civil and criminal Friday, November 8, at Durham; Friday, November 1.

at York Thursday, November 21, Leeds, ctru tna John Cook Twidcll, Hugh McKinnon Wood, and James Hat on Wood I 5 Walter Sibbald Adie, I.T. I Abdul Ali, G.I. George Clarence Allsebrook. I.T. Wiluam Henry Under the liquidation of the Anglo Adriatic Syndt aml Leslie Harold Marks, M.T.j Maung Maung (iL), cats (Limited), of Salisbury House, Mr.

II. E. 11. Shah Mohammad. O.L Nirmal JnU i BurcCM.

AtisUnt OEclat Receiver, has issued some and, observations stating that the company, which was M.A incorporated in February. 1910. to acquire a con Johannes MarniU Reeders and Labh ShenaV Ml 1 John Allan Cleveland Skinner. 11. Geoe Sowden! 4t ehi ln GJT: Olaf Eirik Stout.

L.L George Tavlor th and Ernest Terry, M.T. Lawrence Toothr I.T. Frrnand Touris. O.I. Nai Damrong Tuin, I.T.

Arthur George Wells, O.L Examined, 171: passed, 113. Retired Naval OrnraiSESTExcED for A3aclt. William de la Poer Beresford, 81, retired naval officer, was charged at the Devon Assizes yesterday with' maliciously wounding William Brooking at Paignton It was alleged by the prosecution that on coming borne late at night to. Miss Luscombe's lodging bouse where he lived the accused created a Ambrose, O.L Rama Shankar Bajpai, 11. Cyril disturbance: and struck the prosecutor on the head vranrw lull Annn Jnnn Bavlis aaTi 1 with stick.

The prosecutor pore out this statement. Frank Harrison Bella in ALT. Hattsti handrAi ine riwmer. ui tno diow nun ins witness Bhar, L.I Walter de Winton Herbert Bradley and i Yes, it did. The prisoner.

I am very glad to hear it. Joseph urennan, l.T. iticnarn ranK iiurnani, him raiucji in iwuso, woo Ir. 11. Charles Travers Butler, I.T.J Mohamad Bacha gave evidence, was asked by the prisoner.

Uo you The fonowmg Abdul Cadcr, MJ.i George Hamilton Orahame know what David called all men? HU Lordship betical order) were stieassful st the Ielmidtrr Montagu Cartwright, I.T.; Herbert Charies Fahie That applies to men not women Miss Luaogmbc, examination ot the Law Society, LcU on October Cox, M.T. Frederic Morley Cut lack and Anil Krishna called for the defence, declared that. Brooking first1 10 and Deb, L.I. Edward Maynard Conincsby Denny and 1 assaulted the accused, and that statement to tho J. Arch.

A J. Bensted. C. Brmnptoit. BW.

Shankar Pandurang DesaU G.I. Savaksha Dhun contrary which she had signed had been dictated to Bum. A. J. Chapman.

K. W. Chapman, Con iUha Dhondy, 11. Albert John Edwards, M.T. her by a police sergeant.

The officer, who was recalled. reich, A. R. Da vies, Pave. AU JrT.

were shown as follows Fioni the tables. 733. and from the buffet. 11 a loss ot 169 being incurred in connexion with the concert halL The Assistant Official Receiver adds thathe Casino having been closed in May, 1911, certain furniture was seized, and was sold for 332, all ot which has been or will be absorbed by local claims and expenses. There is nothing to show that the company; had any security of tenure or that they held possession other wise than at the will of the Municipabty of Corfu.

As regards creditors, s. deficiency ot 3.961 14s. Id. isv disclosed by the company's statement ctaflairs, and as regards rontribtAories a deficiency ot 32,6 IL THE LAW Fazal hiahy, waiter nenry rrexe r.vans, aenie m. muHi hu uh um prosecutor nwwu.

m. M.T. Solomon Ford, I.T. Wilfred Justus Foster, first attacked him with a bludgeon and he hit him Walker. fc rrr, W.

T. Gamer. Grsyson, O.L; Din Nath Oautam, M.T.; John Wlding across the head with a single stick just to let him C. n. T.

Guest, C. E. Jarn K. Aj Kennedy. Arundel Geare, LI.

Perer Hedon Gibbins, O.L know he was attacking a naval officer. The Jury Kilbeg. Z. C. P.

Lsnd. I C. Vadiiwon. T. Biehard Edward Clifton Gordon.

I.T.; illiam Holden found the prisoner guUty of assault, occasioning Mayhew. W. T. Metcalfe, G. HoaklasrfJKew.

HiU and Syed Mahomed Askarl Has. M.T. Law 1 actual bodily harm. The polios evidence showed that man. W.

IL cvsotE B. Oden. T. Outen. F.

rence Fielder Hcmmans, Ronald Guy Hill, and 1 the prisoner had undergone terms of Imprisonment W. Psrd J. Faterson, r. U. mch, U.

ii. Itlos, Valentine Holmes. LT. Sved Muhummtid Husain. for failing to find sureties and tor assault, and had I SchuK.

and J. IX ecdnper a Abid Jafry. oricd Haidar I Thelapurath JlampsUai I Bshiett Hon 1 M.T. Hydcr Huscin, 11. Saiyed Hasan O.I.

Evelyn uwydyr Jones. M.T. Khan and Mahomed Jan Khan, 11. 1 Krishna Kurup, O.L; Francis Seward! William: John Loughrey and Cyril W.I ft I 1 11. Thomas Cox Jleech sad Jsmes been heavily fined for wilful damage.

Mr. Perdvsl Clarke said that the Prisoner's wife bad made several attempts to have him certified insane, but directly he suspected these attempts be was clever enough to pull himself together and behave rationally. The prisoner was sentenced' to six months imprisonment with labour. Vrnnher ot candidates, lit Pissed. 36.

The' following candidates are certified by the ex aminers to have passed with distinction, and wi8 ba entitled to compete, it otherwise qualified, at the Studentship Examination in Jane, 191 I Dymoke, L. Msddison, W. H. Kesrsaa, aad'E. Oakdea..