The Times from London, Greater London, England • Page 13

THE gTOCKS JlND SHAMS. TttOAY BTIKIEeV in CwBeU will teagin SaTaad on March 1. Tha tx mtv dT6gn Sioaka, "tstn is and asd oo Fefcnuiy 14. jftLKuSutiona 'el the UDdtioU iTuwtber with at wk ch "iwt nixht aod too pricw at which VSTm5 np tha Iwt Sottlracnt. tbe ra railway end other ecmpsnWe elated here of more then one kind eat relate to the Ordinary stocks epeeLoed.

In tie tit of ell few TVw rtohC OweUtionseretbe latest obtained "fMnTrt 4 oalll days xpt Saturday, when tbe thae obtained at 2. For movements UJV My uk after these kwn refer UnV pd to otfr City ArticW. "IT INDIAN GOVERN SWT STOCK8 AND Tisa roawstATioN w.URmk. ti I 1 Prices. Ppoolet.

i Claetac. 104ti i rati 1S4 1S 104A IA U4J 13S iSS k.Jpx. us Jj6 xo is jo ii JS hi tfL auk MtTVlV let ldK 191 1 jr, jks ih i tvax 135H Scm. ut i It NTS Ki, el i I ml' II nit1 i lira ioj iew ius lus iiT.l!?f4t,w bT part bo dlrkUad for tho lart two haM yoaw aod acJa. cowoxittox jjcs oorxTT rroat, ujfrrrD kixqdok Wednesday; februaby? iseer hn itiiir Dim.

XtrwBta.tfttLl! Ipiiki to Srxnr lirrr. lWllM. 101 COtOXUL AXXt TtOXtXCUb COrXUSMEfT IKXMTMi. n' i Hji: Kil! i Unit 1 IkH1 10' is JS tsS to47 1 j7 Vw. 1 KS Ti 1V 4 Ml ML! ii2 rTLl.

tC lC sill ti i I ltlSi 1S6JUSSZ Hot! I US 0.Vn Urni Cn. lS i I 1 a us D.U: UJ lljjt I 11J? 11J," 16JSI vi iu rii raKS: 5 AMEElCAJf RAILWAY Ill 17W cit.M3is.ri i 4 ln.rrUr. SJ 3SV 53 ii? iAX.J an 1 5.T.H0J Sit. 1 rt.jiTui,u: i r.V Ia.p e.fcli. r.u KTciJo fadite IK: IX.lTWsrrd Ui IML.B1WU.

OTHiS hail way seccbittes. i 6 tot; MS 133 ICS 71 a. I llli 1H w3 1J; JiVfiixa .1 ITi Do. lit 3 I I oeU IWirrtW) 34V. 5Pi 1 (4 Vi i i ir2 s3; i OS 854 1SS lis TtixGEj.ru Asd TEtirnoxi sEccRinzi 1SS Emm 11 iWeacB 1 KricUa; MiUmdta(gLAJ US Ben Hi, Ejo Tu KisciuaxEocs sEcxnuTiEa.

F3i II US iss SIS uS '25 jp 7 2 i its iS iS leu ltv! JS JS iUXES. JS I 1 1H I It it It lA'l 1 1A IA IA 3 1 lli itl ft iH fft i ft Wr IH i ittt 1U IK 1U 1. ik jw 124 12i Ui 125', i i iS ronnas covEESMEjrx ezcuianEa in; 179 ItS 11 27 101U il a W7 V4 71 i2 5 IJS 101 ia; i i 1S2 4 lC2i 1 105 75 ISt vgiim iSB iS c0? 5 5is SSS 2 lul .1 .1 iol4i lot i3 it a a ioS i 13J in? 23 IMS 10 i7S ioes iom iois ll lOllOWlrtr 1 rerftrd. cuanges mpncei iince rw (Toor Bil tolC3S. (1904) to i.

i (Ben iw Tieten 11304) to atto tes "fl' 10 i J. iussj and ditio iShMt5? ft3ai? fg" P'fc tt abfc 1833J loan 4 TrtJuiFuTii; Fi (J c. sVtS1'; 1 SUaiil MSI) to 1S WKro xiu Cti! to 4i 5V tou Vork US041 rex 1umh 'il to J5 I. XMiJo "'Ki (PiertBo. laj 1 1 4.

1 1 Wtai i' ertwi C1T Pff feT "twCe iUif WJtl? 63 71 nod rf 1 eh to Uaie LKrr lo7to 1 to 73 M. SulTi to R4 uxl jV io 1'A iu taw UMmim) 1 1 'DmJ Bttii official record of bualn ill iTnct, marked thus roliu thni to Stocks ob rr" recom ox lUf51011? "rked thus wui amount at apodil rata. CMkll. 144. 1CT4 ttw ZatUU, OmoU, 10t4 RtrttfTtax ajtb ZrtcntiirD Srocrv QvMnlaal.mi.il lM44t uo, IVia, TMiiii 1ML tain lMt OolatnUa.

V3V Oaada. IS04 A 10SS 1 p.e lCjri (JtMaUl. lot Ux. 3H tvu 1GIH UlO lv 1134 Do aft Cana. ltM It a mi W.

AutniUt UlUi. 2 CSS rodEtax stocks, boxds. Oocroxa Fatau. tir Ecuador. Ntw Kit.

BS tUvataaiala. 1U7, Japan, Klea. 75 Nofto. IKS. 17x.d.

Kuatlaa, Iter. I lJiJ, 137S trtaata Va. lttt 34 tM'K li. ArnaUna. 14.

41f4 IVx, N. Crew Rati, 41'i Balnriaa. tail, fa 4. ChuWimsss ba.HU.Si Do, lOi ia XTPU. Unload.

l0k Do, 8tan Homala, Oivak. 1SJU30S 1W14.S IVx. Mcopoir. Do, 11ru Ooeroxa Patams Attain: Ilallan EacUa. Vlrjlala, rood.

SdA SO rraaaiaa UjbmIi. IH RATLWATS. OEDIART oTOcka. 5l Lt JLood ptatkam. lt City a.

Loo loo. L.aad Traaataal. li Tarklah. Da C.BJL Cratuajr, 4S HSS9SS 79 t) 73V 44 AdSL Waatarn. lSJIKI in.

pat. OS 0 SO x.d. Da A. El SMl Ot nfit ana, UV Do, Lool. Exun.

T54 xA. TMaC lMavwt. zs aac. Yoifc. 117S: Lood, Brixhtoo.

171S 70S IS BlSx d. Midland. 1 SS SS 14 14 rf 7Sii ii Do, It. IMS tOo, CooUaicalBlchU. K.

llritlah. Prr Do, Ord, 37 4: X. Waaura. lOH 8. Eatora, 111 ti 7H7 Do 171 XjL US: VTatorloo aad CLy.

IS LIXE LEASED AT A FIXED EEN'TAL. Biritnkaad. 14JV4 DEBENTURE STOCKS. GCEattani.4pA.I43S.4S Load, tUWaatera. 1 p.

Cow, QU NcrUwra. 5 p.e, lift, 11 UJ 4 p.6, 147ii UttnwoUua. 4 140 J9i Hull. 2nd Dab, 100 Midlaai, p.e, 112 ii 13U UV4 IMS N. BrtOab.

3 px, 1C8S Uti A. 14 tUatat7. S3 X. laataro. 4 a.o 146 pJS, III CITAEASTZED 6TOCE3.

Ot. EaaUra. 4 pe, 140S xA. Gu WeaUra. P.O.

Eaat CWie. Lon1.a.N 17H7SA Dot tiV'0" C01 KftA PEETEBEXCE STOCKS. fWtth dltidaodt aoDlliixaat oa tba profit ot aach atparata yaarj fnrntai. 1SS1. 119 ut aawra.p.e, 1I7UXA 18S6, xjL Do, 15SU IX xjL XjL Laao.

a York, 4 p.e,142S Lool. Cbaihim. 4S px, 12JU tDo, 2od PfW, CSS Is4.AXWaat,J Attaa Pftiral. 194H Bagal and Wtr Da, (baraa. US Bomtr.

Baroda, 309 IXDLUT Loud. A a.Waat. 1SS1. 147U 4 34aaeteMr. oUald.

US1. 146 Midland. 14K4I JS 'orth Until h. 4 U30. 1HV BAILWATS.

Indian SJtdland. 133 19V ASV; i 1 Dcinoa. xv. icrsm Koulhrrn MtbraUa. 12 I NUamiylR Waat ot India, tb, 100 AA Indian.

Da(. Ana, UJS D.141 Qrtatlxxlian. 1SS BBITtSa TO5SE3SI053. tCraodTninx. SS 3UK4 tuo, lat 4 px.

Dab, 7 5S O. Wm, 6 p.o, 1CIS xA po, Mld ofCanSS: lltiCu OoaUo a L. Johm 32 WaUloxUa ManawataT xad Mlnnaapolii.at.Pxnl.lit AUERICAX Tt ATT. ROAD 6TOCE3 AND SHARES. Atcblana.

4T. Dcl. 4 txc Pret S2V( D9. 8 o. lu Mt, 114 Hi US sti pe.

Land Grant. lSSS Id 130 ISO lao ioo Manitoba A Carta, jO Midland f. Autnlla. Deb 1C4S Ontario a Qnabse. p.e Jb, 134S Chic, Milvaotaa.

St tDaowr. Ujt i 111 Do, Pre, 34 4 tLouiartJaS JSv4HKS tMiaaosrl. 14U A K. York Oatrai. 102S 1.3.

xorx. i xw, 1 IKorfolk. Praf, A 14 HU tKoribarn Paofle. Praf, IIS PnetrrnnU. SIS tPblLA Baadlac SS AV IWaWt.

ftaf, 14fi AMXniCAX CAILEOAD BOXD3. Ctraarxcr. Canada Sontbara. lat Mt, 111 Cbiraco, BarOnctad. Xabruka.

4px.Bda,8s4 Gou. X. York A Putnara. IX. Tk tt, 4 p.o.

Deha, 10S Cbleaco. Bock lalaad. 102 Atebtiea. 4 tu! lit tDo.A.19H4iA' Baltintora, 4S Battiojora BWeat, lat Mori, 4Vip eJH0 9 Cbloago. 4 p.eCS Dannr.

4 t2S CalTeaton. Bamao, lat Mt, Gd. Rapla and Indiana. 44 Uinota't. catnt.

4 p.e 104U Do, 4 px. Cairo Bhdtn, a JU1KU VBi, 1 90 'I Motkaa K.U. IX. York. L.

Erta. 2nd Mt. Carta K.Yort. Mt, 144 A i 'ortaJc. Con.

Mt, I Do, Spx, 1990, 43i SO '4 Do, Marrlatvt ft PnnfrlTaaia.44pe,UlX 11SS raaBijIvaaia Co.lat Mt, lUii 'I JPbU. a Padlnc lat Praf, J2H Ptttaburr. Cia, a Cbioaro. 4 n'sT's im" Toioda. 11IS PL Looia Brtdco.

lat Mt, 135 ft. Paul MlnneatvnUi, 10314 W. Virginia A Piaiburf. px. Mintieapa.il.

H. Maria. 4 px. lat 6H Mlaaoon. lit MU.

d. rVnxxrsa. Alabama Q. Eoothcra, px. Db, Kaatsro et Maaucbowtti.

1C2' Do Gaa.Mt t3 7 9 Atlantic Itt Laaaed. 2 XUL 95 1. 14 Cttaco. at. Paol.

and SS' i rOBXIGX EAILWAY8. ABtofacxrta.l09S 9 TAraaoo. 'A Gfc. Babia and Kan Praselaeo, 14: tBraxil Uu (wotbara. ZS B.

Arrat Ut. Bonihern. IMS 3S Paooirlnnia. Ob. Ml, 1S PblLA PadiBt, lap.

Mort, 106S 8L Paul, Mia, 4 Waat, lat Dab, Cordoba and TtrkxS p.8, tS 4 70 63 7CS Cordoba CWutral. CaaL Slb, Sa a La Cuatra A Caracal. px. Dab, Do da Praf 121 BrraaXortbarn. tMtiicao.

17 US A rat, 4)4 4a5tia 0o 2imL fi 2 7U Midland Uranar. Dab, 7 itraHL 17Si A 4. OetomaB. llS Kio CU.ro Sao Paolo. 1V Boral bardioiao, 944 A Urnroa orUiern.

lb, 3 ojmngiuwn. li. Arta and Paciaa. lit Dab, Do, I p.c4 2nd. 42 B.

Ayraa aad Baaaria, CSS Do, KxtcnaioBi, 6 Da, 4 px. 1Mb 101S B.Arraa Waat, IS J0CV; CoL A rieatioa. CTT4 Cant. Urua aii. 15J.

4 3S FQEEIOX BAILWAY 0BUQAT10N3. rntrata. Booth Anitriaa, 3 px, 14A A yortbm. of tba Airloaa Do, fierlea X. 14 public.

103 Booth Italian. 1 ax, 11 Ottoman, r.Ayg. Bank of AuttraUaia, E4 Bank ot Britiib X. America. CG Bask of Zaalaud, 4 px.

Goar, li 4 llUuvtt iBTMtant. Pd. llH jiBaMtaa. tiA llar.li fjoaTtrHn XEaatara Ut lxtaacnal aad OaV(S Ghana. tta Da, Dab, MhTS I A AXn XLXCTRIO LtQBTIKO.

fa MaTU dadltaiaa. IS WaoaUoMw faaptr, 711 ft XXIVBAHCZ. ASUaoa AturanaL 1CSS VI Pfcralt. 7S3 itaiimv KorUli Krttlih la tteptof err Ualalnf, laujattaL JS'i Impartal LUa. TS Borax, Dab, 92 Caatla Mall.

UA TS' Koral laaaranua. SI waioa ataanaaa. MINES. Durban BoodapaorL 7 Ooratua.Pra(,3A RloTUlo, Uti tBirPtxa. Ualoa Btaaja.

13H Do Dab, 101 TEA. JaktLlSA Jwtui a TXtXaRAfHS A3TD TSLEPHOXES. Anflo Aaanran. 4J xd. Katiosal.

SA 4i do, Eaatarn. 1J Do iti Do, Dab, US DTuVioflT Tndit.uroian. SJ W. a BratUiaa. iSV W.I.dia.Dab,110SSS "ALWAYS ADBUS.

ilSarH TtCalaxuSH WATER. Grand Junction, A.lJ Tarapaca. Lanbaca. 10 p.0,1712 W. MUdiaax, JUJ MIXES, Fb.

To Oay't price (xham fully paid, excapt wbart Utet!) DIAMOND. I a JasanfaetoU. 17K 1 EXPLORATION AND LAND. Bathatnaland. 33a.

J4a. Baira 5. 6a. BrlUibSJUrieaCbA Urad.4.6d.43a. Cvb Ooldar Ida ot 8.

Afrlea, 3H 3t Kiplorinc.4H4Sx.d. Etploratloa. 4a. pd, lKlpm. T.

Jobnaoo and Co, Ua.6d.19a.Cd. AfrUandrr.lSIS Aurora. KS Aatva Wait (Saw), 14a. 6J. ISa.

Balaorala Main Raat. Ca.7i. Ea tjaa. IA 2A Johaanaa.Cu.Iamt. Liibon Earlrn (Nav)L 4a.

3d. 4a. Sd. Maiambtqaa. 22a.

Cd. ISa. tl. Ocoaaa.2S:S IluSaldaorn 3JL unarap trur. xx.

Champ d'Or. 3A 4H4i( Dm Lmi.Ui.6d. 19x64. 60. Ccimca (Na)t iS Cttr aad Suburban, 1SS ItS CUBtr (NawJi 1(1 1 Coat.

Dorp. 4 4V Caa(S7wKirV2A Durban Koo.l oia. ad. Kelya.lta. 15a.

'arraira. 14 ii IS Galdanhuia. SA SH Uald.Daap.6S 6 Ita. Gaorta Ooeh. IS Ulcnealra Ooldfioldt 4A lUa.d.

iw, w. oi. ita so. Strath AL Ootd Truat (Nalt 3A 3A x.d. TranaaaJ UoalTruL Ma.6d.33i.6d.

GOLD. IX. Tn Kll 1 Jompara. oft d.1 Buaoarier ILooUa EKt.Na).3il3it KtekidoTp, a. paid.

Ca.Cd.7a. fnixbta. 3A JA Laaclaacu Block li, 17a. 16a. IaacL Roja', 4A LupaarTi VlaL 14a.

Mala fiaaf (Kav). 14a. IS. Mir Cona. (NawL 4S.6d.46a..

XJ. Xw and Charltoo, 6A 6A xA. ModdarfoataiaCfaw). lialH Moodtaa.10a.6d.Ui.6d. NUal.

6 i x.d. Xiftt Daap. 1A 1A aoatb.Lod.la.6d.9a.Sd Tranataal Coaaoii datad.llS Traaa. Ert. aad Dtv, 17a.

Cd. Ita. 6d. Tranaraal aod Oaa. AiaoeUtion.

IH 1H Tranataal Ooldflalda, 1A 1ft Trana. Laoda, fall7 pd, 7. Id. 8a. 64.

Zaobatia T'WH fi 2H3A Noutm Daap, 4H4S OrioaOawUSiH 1 aarl Caatral (Naw) 25a. 26a. Primrcoa fNnrJ, I IH PriaaaEitata.lHm Kaodftn, 23a. id. 14a.

Band Minaa.21 KiKiaLINral, Robiaaaa. B4Md.Daap.2ATA 81mtar and Jack, 8SlonifNallli. EplUo rrm, ItaAd. RaabOBa.tH:S Botbarlaad HU.3a.5J. Cd.23a.Cd.

Tautoola. fl Tranataal CUi Expl, YlHai Main. 4 SS Wammar. P4 7S Wolhutar. SS SH Woroaatr.44SxX Brokoo 1112 Proprietary.

(J. Idaho. 4a Id. pd, 3a. 3d.

3a. SL LotvL and Prorincial. 23S Loud, aad Wcatminitcr. S3T4 xA LodI. of Maxioo aad 8.

Amariea, TndlJolnt 6Uu33 2S d. XL ProtiaeiaL 4J Parr a. 76? x.d. S'ao lard South Africa, SSS Unioa of Australia, xA. Do, 4 e.

Im, 10JS TJnlon at London, 31 x.4. BREWERIES AND DISTILLERIES. ATlacpn. 1231a 143 10jl 4 'i Capital and Countiei. 34S Cbxrtrred of ladia.

24S Ctj.lS Ooleiat.35?iH Cona luUted, 7A Uonzkoog' aad Ehanxbal, 23 flap, of Ptrata. 3 Load, and BratUiaa, 19 DoDbl2lS Arnold. PamtL Dab, 197S 7 Baruxler. Praf, 6f Barrct a. PreL.

2A Bruto OoraJ6Va TH IS St 41 Cheltrabxni. IS 1 .1 Calebaa tar, Praf. Do, Drb, 1C0H 4SKASK d. i lot, 4, 7tlU. MUwaukea.

Praf, 6 NrwraiUa. Praf, 12ft Nev Kxclaod, Prrf, 10 Neir Weitmintter. Praf, 6 Parker Bunlem. Prat, 14A Bojal. Breottord, Prat, 12S tbc Louia.

2'4 P.xIL Dab Ill BbnvaU. Prat, 13S Tadcaatar Tower. Dab, 103 1.11. izyt Drcctar.Drb, uulcawa.5tw Uoar.DaU,ll3T; roMMERCZAXa INDUSTRIAL, Ac Walker. ITat Watncr, Prat, 16j im'ad Braid.

5, Anium' DwalUon. Ill Do. 4Vi o. Praf, 11S4, 120 1SS Barter, 2 Do, Dabi 116S BeU'r Attxatoa. I A hotrO.

i4 tA. Bryant awl May. ISA X4. liucknaU. 7S Do Praf Ti: Cantarvlra Watar.

I 44C Car. Dock. IU px. Dab, Do. Praf 11 Coau.

Prafl7A 4Eataunv4 Lraa 1 Etafad.9 Per Siret Warahonaa. Dab, 102 General Uydraalio, 944 UordoB UbUla. ITS A x4. Do PraU 14A x.d. SUM, i 4 Howard aad BuUonth.

12 India Kubber. 2iA Latuaaa hdicatj.ll HAS Lbtar. 4A M.A. London PatUion. SS IMaxuB NordentalL IK Do, Deb, 77 CxX Kalaon Brotbera, I lympia.lA4; AS riVacBi a Laaii: 'A li, Peara, 4 tPUlaborr WaibbarB.

FtaL, IA Prioa'a Patant, Kobrru. IS Halt Colon. Deb 112 8aa Pablo Nitraae. 3A Ban Babaulan STUrata, rlatoy UotaL 10ri Bpenoar. Tnmar, Sr 8 plan ft Pond.

11 11 A Utt Mprau'a Patent, 10J4 beteat ABtotaaOe, JS A TJaitau Ltmmer AtphaKa. WaUia, SS A xx. Tin. rrT TI. A i i 1 17 Ii 7a xt Barrod'e tUlebklaa.Prat, 6S CORPORATION 6TOCXB COLONIAL AXD TOEX13N.

Oamaru px, Raf, Ouebro.4px.Dab,89S133 none, iRTaroxrxin. 4S ISM MaaeTlxrV, 4 Mexico. 60S Moe.arldao.C3S Montreal. 6p.c 101 ix, i pcu, y. Toron'x, I px.

WatarvorVx Df bV Do. 4 1C1V Napier Harbeor, P.4104 YelpaVaWet p.o.Bda,SC 13 DOCKS. AW. India, IKS Lond. A SL XAtbarina, ISS, 123S narrej.

tJ MtllaalL 69 Do, Spx. Dab, 142 7INAXCIAL. LAND, AND INVESTMENT. Arvratlna Land. Praf tU.

Barlac X5au, 2nd UtL ICIS 7 BrU. 8. AriVa, Deb, 110 xld. Deb.Q.rpvlS,,. Do, lit Mt, 105 Do, 4 pc.

Deb, 101 UDOJlASttt. atorra tbeffirtcflxtajjab. NlL DtasooaL tV ii X. Zealand Loan, Pcrtrriaa 40H 44 ft Trail ft Acescy of AlitriIaU.l, ana uom Diaoi Men 4 117, aVSab, CotbIS Aa. Trait and Uniel)iasonLl(tS44 van Men.

at Acenerof lut. MISCELLANEOUS. BayMya Eevard 1U. 9d. 12a.

3d. W. Anatraltan li. iaUa. 3f 3t Alaaka Mexioaa.

1 AUaU TreedweU, 3 3S x. Tba Traaitaxl Cold Exploration and Land Compact (Limited) hai receitM the oUowinx raUrrani Ore traateJ. 2. ISO tone, jield MUla' Day Dawn UaltedUold Minea Oap.oy (UaitadCloruabed during the lortaifhl aodla( 2nd tut, I.Cii toaa ot uuarU tor 2.091OI. The Weomer Cold ICnlnf Company (LUaUedl Raralt for fcf7 Ireia cyaoida ptaot.

4.37S toa treated, rxldinc 1.297oz. Tba United Iry Botf Gold Mininc Company (Limited) latt bobU cruabed tO toaa: which tlalded lSCoi. uj boblb aloffytoBtetn Mine I Limited). carata vara tecoreied far tba month. January.

Ibe NUl UoU Miniic (Jutapeoy (LUnltadl Baault of laat month a eruibin BaUary. A164ox. cyanldo, L6S7ox. lataL atiox. The Via Era Geld Mlnea EataU (UmltedV Baeatt of days' working with SO atampe roaa 4.20J tont.

2JJ0ox. from C4J0 tana. 7Sox. iroD crackle workil total yield for taunth. luAox.

Baylrt'a Reward Claim Ucld MialCf Coapany (LimlledL Weak'a ma 130 tooa. MlCi)F. LlmUlJ. Rtura of rUdfer the moath of Jaaaaryi S.1910X. LAW REPORT, Feb.

5. SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE. COURT OF APPEAL. Btfon Loads Justices Lindlet and A. L.

Smits.) BOTTES T. THE CIXT AND SCBUBBAN IRJUNENT JESETIT BUILDING SOCIETY. Thli was an appeal.froia decitioa of Mr. Jottieo Stirliog'x upon a question of the construction of rule of a appUcatiotfrelxted in fena to a inatter of lieadinj The action was brought by an investing member of ft building society who had girea. notice of withdrawal of his inretznents.

The notice became effective on February 20, 1891. The plaintiff sued on behalf of himself and all other mem ben who had given notices of withdrawal, which became effective on or before that date. He claimed jru'er alia, a declaration that the advancing' members were entitled to priority according to the dates at their respective notices of withdrawal became effect! The defendaQti took out a summons asking that the piainuu mignt oe oraerea to smena bis pleadings by iuiiu gut an passages wnrreiry ne was represented as suing otherwise than in his individual capacity. The material' rule of the society was as follows Upon giving 'one month's notice in writing to the secretary ot bis intention to do so, any member may withdraw his investments at an monthly mwrthig of the society, the amount to be repaid out of the moneys received from members in repayment of advances on the night fur witnurawai, out. snouid tne repayments not be sufficient, the balance shall be paid from the tame fund on the next or.

following monthly night. If several members shall give notice to withdraw within any one month they shall be paid pro rata." It was argued on the part of the defendants that, on the construction of this rule, in case theru was not sufficient money in hand at any monthly meeting to pay the members whose notices of witaarawai Eaiiinea matured, sucn members had no right to be paid at the next monthly meeting in priority to those members whose notice had in the meantime become effective. Mr. Justice Stirling refused to take that view, and consequently held that the form ot the action was right, and dismissed the summons. The defendants appealed.

Mr. and Mr. Monti cue Lush supported the appeal. Mr. Cecil E.

Bovill, tor the plaintiff, was not called upon. Their Lordships considered that the decision of Mr. Justice Stirling was correct, and dismissed the appeal. HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. CHAXCERrDIVISIONV (Btfort Mb.

Justice Jhxttt.) MUSKY V. BAILEY. This was a case of residential nuisance. The plaintiff in the action was the occupier and lessee of a bouse and grounds called HighOeld, Buahey heath, Herts. The plaintiff held the property, which was of a residential kind, for a term of 21 years, commencing in 1SS9, at a rent of some 170, and had expended himself a considerable sum on the improvement of the property.

Some GO or 80 yards front the plaintiff's home were two cottages. In the year 1890 some land behind these cottages was purchased by the defendant, who was a builder and carpenter. Ibe defendant erected thereon a small villa residence and a workshop, the latter being a structure of corrugated iron, and glass, oa a brick In the spring of 1894 the defendant, who appeared to be an enterprising man and had increased hi business, placed in his workshop two circular saws. The larger and more powerful of these saws was Used lor cutting timber of some 11 in. in width and travelled to a length of 12ft.

The plaintiff alleged that the noise made by the working' of these saws constituted an intolerable nuisance, destructive of the health and comfort of himself and his wife and other residents in the house, and of such a nature that his house, if vacated, would be unlettable as a residence. The plaintiff claimed relief by injunction. The action was tried on viva voce evidence. Mr. Lerett, Q.C., and Mr.

K. 73. Yard ley appeared for the plaintiff aad Mr. Farwell, Q.C., and Mr. E.

Ford for the defendant. Ms, Justice Chittt said that the question was whether the alleged nuisance was of such a character as to materially interfere with the ordinary comfort of the plaintiff. This was the test' of nuisances alleged to arise from noise or the analogous classes of nuisances arising, for instance, from smell or smoke. It was true that persons who lived in towns and cities or manufacturing centres had to pot up with things, but it was alsa true that locality was a eircttmstanee which affected the legal decision of what was or was not a nuisance. Thus it bad been said that what would cco stitnte a nuisance in Belgrave square would dot neccs sarily be a nuisance in WhitechapeL The meaning of which was that the mode of' and standard of comfort were different ia different places.

In the present case the neighbeurhood was admittedly a residential one. The length of duration of the noise was another circumstance to be taken account. The noise here began at 0 in the morning and continued until 8 in the evening. As to the character and effect of the noise there was a conflict of evidence. The plaintiff and his wife said that they were wakened by it.

They described the noise as a continuous bussing, ending sometimes ia a discordant shriek and sometimes in a melancholy wail. This ending referred to the noise of saw.cn its quitting the timber. It might bathers observed that tba ahrisk ol a saw was the COLD MINING AND WEST AUSTRALIA iff Hi aald Sal ZTI.UISJL El Sva dhle aots. (coroltetS aTTiav 17 i or a peeeti on a greasy i ii attsjad" to his tttsIneasT The nUMtifTi wife said thai the had rndeavceTtTeseare it ant was tea ceased in the eraninr aha t.r ta il K.if.K? exptrieneed on quHUes; screw iifTT Bh implessiosa left oo the tdawtaff aad his wife aier the ceaaing of the iv. I.V "wjea jmes at the brgian ng of the fcth book ofVaradise Lost, lacked the charm of an angel voice.

TU defendant was engaged in getting an honest living and teemed to la a golahead srTef Pttf tVi H0, relacUnt to interfere with rlAintifT and his witnesses exag t.iVi0 Um of hi witnesses compared it o. Another described it as rt embiing the ham of the bee. This witness was an engineer certainly gave his evidence hoaeatly and HTt sT iTdship could not but bear in mind ItT taissioB and had discharged rftJi'i11; was employed. If the plabUff and his witnesses had been guilty of cxaggere tion the df endxnt Js witnesses had unduly depreciated ad effect of the noise. On the balance t.w he took was that the idaintiff had made out his ease that there was a noise which materially interfered with his.

eomfort in the enjoyment of his house, and his Lordship therefore granted aa injunction to restrain the defendant from using his aw in such a way as to cause a nuisance. Tne result of such an order would be the defendant could not use his aawa as he waa now using them, tfoch use was a nuisance at law. The defendant might be clever enough to find some means of using his saws without causing a nuisance, and be therefore should suspend the operation of the Injunction for two months, in order to nti tk T. Ml VK7MI11IUU1T VI iwmedying the nuisance. Tbe defendant must par costs.

a do to case uat oi Lambtonv. Mellith (10 Tkt Timet Law lie ports, tainias; a safe epitome of the principles on which, for ltUr ternt what may be exUed residential nuisances depend. Before Mb. Justice North.) TAUOt V. tiwinv awn This action is brought by Messrs.

AVasson and Fa well, of So. 4. Kt P.r,M..Kl I Fawson and Leafs (Limited), the well known ware 7: Kt abua cauxenrara. oj tneir wnt the plaintiffs claim an, injunction to restrain the defenoanta (rm l. new building la Dean's eourt, Doctors' commons.

injure, or onatruct any 01 tne ancient lights passing to the premises, and also from Mnsitilnr moh. erected which shall cause snr obstruction to the said ancient lights. The plaintiffs also claim damages. A motion was now made on behalf the plaintiffs for aa mjwi. nvw mu.u uro.

ut uio acwuu or further order, ia the terms of the first part of the jMamiuia ni, exciuomg tne mandatory part. The defendants' premises are very extensive: comprising a namber Of housaa In St. Panf 'armroWap and some in Carter lane. The defendant have. recently obtained from the Ecclesiastical Commissioners a new lease of a portion of their premises.

nn ihm tnn. aI V. and in so doing they propose to raise their, new buildings tn a irrnewtjMh1w i. t. this alteration the plaintiffs allege that the access of light to their premises will be seriously obstructed.

The defendanU, on the other hand, deny that any material injury will be inflicted upon the plaintiffs. The new buildings have been commenced. There was a exeat conflict in the evidence, as is usual ia cases of this HUU. Mr. Swtnfea Eady.

Q.C., and Mr. W. F. Hamilton were for tl t.1 M. rii.U.n4 Mr.

E. 8. Ford were for the defendants. M. justice North thought that an injunction miC hl tn ka imnlA tk.

4k. I I v. Ill, feMVU VI UIV VJ UV IIIB.II1 TOMW that the plaintiffs would succeed at the trial. But, on fhm V. 1 nf v.

VM UIVW IIAWIHIlCUIiCf U0 thougbtthe better course was to grant the interlocutory j. Tri natntiffa mnrf: Vi nntl r. taking as to damages. CLYN Y. THE COOLGARDIX PROSPECTING COMPANY, (LIMITED), AND OTHERS.

Mr. T. B. Carson, ou behalf of the plaintiff, Mr. Richard Henry Oljn, moved ex parte for an interim injunction over Friday next, to restrain the defendants, the Associated Gold Mines of Western Australia (Limited), from allotting to the defendant G.

P. Doolette, and to restrain the defendant Doplette from accepting the allotment of, 9,500 share ia the Associated Company, being part of 190,000 shares in the same company agreed te be allotted to the Cool gardie Company, or to tha defendant Doolette as their nominee, as part of the price of certain mining properties in West Australia. The plaintiff claims to be entitled, by virtue of an agreement between himself aad Doolette, to the 9,500 shares as his commission upon the sale of the It is understood that the Associated Company intend to proceed to an allotment of the 190,000 shares to morrow. Ms. Justice North granted aa injunction over Friday best, to restrain the Associated Company from dealing with or disposing of the 190.000 shares without reserving a sufficient number of shares to provide for the commits ion clsitricd by the plaintiff, and, ia the same way, to restrain Doolette from accepting any of the shares.

His Lordship also gave leave to serve notice of motion for Friday next, with the writ. (Before Mb. Justice Eeexwich.) The Practice as to Originating Summonses en the Chancery Division. Mr. Justice Keeewich has recently made some strong obserratioas upon the lax and inaccurate manner in which originating summonses for taking the opinion of the Court under Order LV; are not infrequently drawn, the questions submittedto the Court being framed either too generally, or else in sueh a vague and inaccurate form as to fail to state with any precision the real points required for the decision of the Court.

In a recent case hisJrushipmadetome observations upon the extreme inconvenience arising from originating summonses which asked for the opinion of the Court not being put into more precise form than they usually were, tans necessitating adjournments for amendment and further evidence, all leading to delay and additional expense, which would be avoided if the cases were presented in a proper manner, ta the first instance and he invited the attention of counsel to the great importance of theae summonses bemg carefully settled. For his part, added bis Lordship, he should like them in all cases to be signed by counsel, so as to insure, as far as possible, their being settled in a form properly adapted for obtaining the opinion of the Court, The question of practice or procedure thus raised by his Lordship has also led to similar observations by other Judges of the Chancery Division is one that seems to reouire the attention of the Rule Committee of Judge. It appears to be the common practice for these originating summonses to be settled by the plaintiffs solicitor, and not by counsel, although they often invohe questions of title to property of very large amount. It is understood that solicitors would gUdiv avail themselves of the assistance of counsel in sucn cases were it not for a rule prevailing, it is said, in the Taxing Master's office, not to allow on taxation any fee to eo'insel for settling an originating summons. This rule, if it does in fact exist, seems to require revision.

There annears to be no sufficient reason wiry a fee should not be allowed to counsel for settling the questions on aa originating summons involving, ss it' often does, large and important issues just as a fee is allowed for settling the endorsement of a writ, though dealing, it may be, with questions of less complexity and import ance tnaa tnose on an originating summons. (Before Mb, Justice Romer.) Windino up Business. His Lordship dealt with a number of applications in the winding up of companies, lut had not heard all the cases in to dar's list at a few minutes before 4 p.m. In answer to counsel. His Lordship said he should not continue the company list to morrow.

Mr. Justice Vaoghan Williams was returning to town one day this week, when, by the terms of the order transferring the company business, his own jurisdiction ia these matters would come to an ens. QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION. (Before Ms. Justice Wills end Mr, Justice Weight.) This ease, an appeal from tbe County Court of Newcastle, raised a new question on bills of sale whether the bill of sale professing to be given for money now paid is bad if tbe money was not forthcoming at the time of execution, though it was paid before ik I kill nf registration ot wio given on Mar 8, 1894, and purported to be given as t.

.1 PlV n.11 tn mnfn. At that time the money was not forthcoming, the lender navmg it tn a nana on depwit wimii injiunu withdraw it. But on May 11 it was paid, and next day, on the 12th, the bill of rale was registered. The County Court Judge thought that the consideration was not truly described as tbe money was not only not paid, but not forthcoming at the time of execution there ta MV. WTSti TT1 bra waa ubji an ryi 7 in three months' time, though here it happened to be within three days so be gave judgment for the execution creditor who had taken th goods in execution, IK.

ik. LI1T a raw ids grantee Mr. Newsome appeared on his behalf, aad urged that a i i A Mia ikil vtek. 0 4 AJeasa ail tnat toe Act rwquirwu. sideratloa should be truiy statea, i.

mx an.l if natrl at Om time ef iuc it waa registration, though not at the tune of execution. e. JUSTICE WliLl. xtatw jvu maj wuw the time is to be Uken. to be the tm vf registra i a VI it Bmrt be admitted that there is no such authority.

But the precise day of payment is sot xaaierial Ex parte Johnson. (Z0 at, tnr ii etm niion rrtkl Itor. Tbtrrtt are authorities which support ComtT Court Judge Ex parte Htdfe (19 Ch. The COURT upneta ue new iMvniiiT vwn Judge and held the bill of sale bad. Mx.

Justice Wills aad the consideration of the tall of sale was stated to oe a now paaa i 1MM. tt A 'MunAv' Vaa VIA. uropping tne ww iw, i li i it, 4imi nf MMifutt': Ttiei eni ataw Bi 11 in abank irom which the leader proprsed to draw Kout ta three davs. tm waseauumg iptwiu 1 ta av ii wiivwcr as ue time or sfie iriallss uf Ifco IwTI of iawre was only a promise er ifssaisat tn ear it at some iadetnite 'future time. ThTcoeWicT tsre fera, was pxrt trulr stated and tsU leaned Jtkdge was ngbt in holding the bill of sale bed.

Mm Justice. WksosT concurred Appeal dismissed. MUNDAT T. PXEXT ai CO. TnU was a case en tppeal from the Bow Countr Coert lthe ilcrbil Acfarisfe of the eonUrurtion of the Tewer ltridge.

The deJend anta were contractors for the stone work. The Corporation of London had the control of all wavs." fhere wet other contraetors enraged the work, aod the workmen had to pass throh a tunt. which was WkdM the control not of the contractors, but of the Corporation, and it was Itnperfeetly lirfcted. There tamel with the edie tuned up. and.

the ptamtiffbeing sent to get some planks aii having te pass tbrtmgi the tunnel, trirspeden the turned op edge, of the tramwar aad itrmred his knee. pan. There was only within 15 yards one lamn. aad and gave a flickering, unsteady sort of light, The foreman ot the work haj just before gone plAintiff. m'huparticTi our relied on tbe imcerfeet li hin, tk.

i judgment for the plaintiff, the workman. His em. ptoyers, the defendants, appraled. Mr. KUECG appeared on their behalf, and arced that there was no eridenee of any liability.

Mr. Stcxch, for the plaintiff, urged that there was. The Court, however, held that tk i upheld the appeal. Me. JusTlCEiWiLLs, giving fadgmeut, said there was no rexaonable evidence of any kind of negligence, either on the part of the defendants or tar one employed by them, m.

swperateodine the ways. The tunnel was under the control of the Corporation, not of the contractors. The anneal mnai n.t judgment must be for the defendants. Mk. Justice Wright agreed.

woagmeat accordingly. WHITEAWAT AND OTHERS V. CODAED. This ease. On aDOril frum th ttlnnm.hnw Cnmr.

Court, raised a question in aa action against the East Indian firm of Whiteawav.Laidlaw. in.1 i af li fun. hall street and Calcutta, whether a guarantee given on their engagement of a young gentleman for theirnoase ia Calcutta covered an advance made by them to him (accord ing to their usage) to defiay the expense of his voyage to Calcutta. The facts appeared to have been as follows On August 1.1893. the firm wrote to the young maa aceeptinr his atrJJcaiion for an assistant's po.VtI? ia ttehoase.the terms of the easement being ni that (fw ni .1 required for your passage out to Calcutta, such sura to be considered as a loan anil tn vri.t nn tn tv.

firm out of your salary, as may be arranged with them miCalcutU (2) hnmedUtely upon jeur arrival ia talcutU you will eater their service, your salaty com mencmr trom the date of Jour. salary for tbe first year to be 150 rupees per I month, for tbe second 175 rupees, and for the third! tne event ot your completing taree years service to ths satisfaction of the firm, they engage to return to you the cot of your passage out to Calcutta (5) the firm require an undertaking of a surety immuij uaem agamsti ait loss to wnica tney may be put through your failure to fulfil tbe duties astigned to TOU in breach of vour eontraxt with f.rm Next day the defendant gave the following guarantee! on which tbe question had arisen: "To Messrs. Whitcaway, Laidlaw. and Calcutta. Sirs, I will hold myself responsible for the good behaviour' of W.

J. Hughes, and will undertake to guarantee yon against mi uuuij irom uianonesiy on ms part or nynis breach of, or neglect to fulfil his part of contract between him and you, ill health or acrident excepted. Yours, C. J. UODARD." fDated Annii 2.

Ik9.11 The young gentlemaa went out to Calcutta and entered the eervtca of tbe firm, and in Mav laat ha left their service. It did not arjpear that there hail hrn conduct for which be had or ronlrl hire dismissed, but he had written to them that circum stances required that be should leave." and a member of tne arm (as stated) said be had better leave. The firm had advanced him 35. of which 15 had awn iExiWfa4 out of bis salary, leaving 30 due. and the 15 was returned to him to enable him to car his nt.

hnn making 35, for which the action was brought in the ijounty Uourt against Godard. the surety. The Judge noasoited on the ground that the guarantee did not extend to the claim. The plaintiffs ancealedJ Mr. REED.

O.C. fwith Mr. R. J. Williai.

arr.ii.l on their behalf and urced that the ruarahtee must be understood according to its plain terms. Mr. EL. O.C. (with Mr.

Kinr.FnrlmwV for the defendant and urged that the guarantee applied only to losses arising to the firm from misconduct of tne clerk in us employment, not to aa independent contract of loan. Moreover, the contract had been put an end to. The Court came to the conclusion that the nonsuit was right and that the appeal must be dismissed. Mr. Justice Wills, trivinjr inJnunt: nvi specific point of law had been Uken before the County Court and his nonsuit ought to be upheld if on any reasonable view of the evidence it could la supported and if there had been no bieach of contract by the clerk, there waa an end of the He bad resigned, it was true, but his employers bad acquiesced in his leaving and lent him 15 to enable him to' da an.

The result appeared to be that the contract had been rescinded by mutual consent. jib. justice wright concurred. Appeal accordingly dismissed. Before the Lord Chiet Justice and a Special Jury.) WYNDHAM T.

VISCOUNT DEERHUEST. This was an action for breach nf nromls and When the case was called on Mr. IklSCH (Mr Turrell with himl. on lehalf of the defendant, said that bis client had this momingreceived a letter from the other side intimating that the plaintiff did not propose to appear or nroeeed with tha case. The defendant, however, and Lis witnesses were all in Court ready to meet the claim as he always declined to pay one farthing or settle the case.

ft tne jury saving oeea sworn. Judgment was entered for the defendant. (Before Me. Baros FoLLOCE end a Special Jurj.) NEWMAN V. LONDON GENERAL OMNIBUS COMPANY (LIMITED).

This was an action to recover damages for injuries sustaised by reason of the negligence of the company's servants. The defendants denied the negli gence, and also allejtd contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. Mr. Kemp, Q.C., Mr. Tindal Atkinsou, Q.C., and Mr.

P. Rose lanes were for the plaintiff and Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., Mr. McCall, Q.C., and Mr. Arthur Powell were for the defendants. Mr.

Kemp, QIC, in opening the case to the jury. said this action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for very serious injuries which be. had sustained owing to an accident in which his phaeton had been run into by aa omnibus belonging to the defendant company. It appeared that on April 10, pi was being driven along the HacSney road at a slow pace r. nrin tv, WW.

tr.r 1 Ml. 1 WV WW UM west, and in the middle of it there is. a double line of tiam lines. The plaintiff 's phaeton was going towards the west, on the proper side of the road. 'Coming towards the plaintiff's phaeton, in the middle of the road, was a market cart.

Behind the cart, and going in the same direction, was aa omnibus, and the driver. desirous of parsing the cart on the outside, made a swerve, and In doing so the wheels of the omnibus caught in the train line, and this caused the r.Tnnit., t0 collide with the phaeton ia. which the plaintiff was driving. The omnibus, it was alleged, was op the wrong side of. the road, in a place where it ought not to be.

Both the plaintiff and bis eoaeh man were thrown out of the phaeton, and the former was very seriously iajuied. The plaintiff was picked up and conveyed home, and a doctor was called m. It was found that he was suffering Trom concussion of the spine. He was confined to his room for a considerable period, and at the present time he was in no way as strong a man as he had been before the accident. The result of the accident was very serious, as the plaintiff was not able to attend to his business properly.

That plaintiff had. been in three railway accidents, but at the time of the' accident in respect ot which be was claiming ia this action he had entirely recovered from any injuries be had sustained in the previous aceidents. In conclusion he asked the jury to award his client substantial damages for the injuries he had sm tamed. The plaintiff, Mr. H.

M. Newman, was then called, and said he was a cigar merchant carrying on business at 4 and 5, Long lace. Aldsrsgate street. On April 10 he was driving along llackney road towards Aidfz. gate street between 6 and 7 o'clock in the evening.

His phaeton was on the left side of the read going towards the west, about a yard from the kerb. He saw a market cart in the middle of the toad oa the tram line going towards tbe east. As the cart was an reaching he saw an omnibus come from behind it suddenly. Tbe wheels the omnibus caught in tie tram line, aad this caused to skid. The omnibus struck his phaeton with great violence, and he was i thrown out into the cutter.

He waa ttiirted up. As he could not set a esio, he got into a pasiixr tramcar aad went to cis office in Aldengate treat. He felt ery ill and trembled a good deal. He was Uken home aad was Terr ill all night. He vomited and felt great pain in his back aad ia his limbs.

Dr. D'Arcr Adams was sent for next morning and prescribed for him. He was eonfined to his room for three weeks. His symptoms were that he felt very cold, prickly sensations in bis bands and legs, and there was pain at the base of the spine. He could not walk without dragging his left leg.

At the present time he. felt depressed aad morbid and could not attend to his business. He had previously been ia three railway accidents, but had entirely recovered from all injuries that he had saw tained in them before this accident happened. About two rears ago, being tnfions to farther insure ids life, be was examined by the medical officer of the Metropolitan Life Assurance Cetnpaay, aad a further risk was undertaken by the company. Craaavmined by Sir U.

Cxaexe, Q.C He was thrown out of tne phaeton. Ha did not rexDcabex if the bom fell down or sot. He tad bees ia tfaee railway accidents. The first oecurrwd 58 years as. Be get 300 as compensation from the Nerth Zs stern Railway ia respect of his claim, la 1873 he brought aa action against the Great Northern Railway for injuries he bad sustained and got by way oi eecapensation.

He gave as particalars ot hit injuries ia feat case solas hi the back, pins aad needles in his limbs, aad a dasjgiag of the lew. Ia February. 1S74, he brnogtit aa acssoq agaast the Qreat Westeta Railway for isQwiee be aad received and recovered tm compeBsakioa, la laat tba sraeAesna were tawea tea sasne. a it a. Tktor tJUasef's aeaetoa aW the time ef the scrides? of tU i 4,1 jjrk.

at road aerideaa he eu ilmt tn i waaosTvinwas taa rate oi lowroi nims ss vsa sdTtscaw. lktiMws I fSkratrntaM traaL laeaiaiae ayddle of tae raad.r can was comag towards him. cnastHssi oatt from behind tba cart. Its hind whead carnal, i at tram Dae nearest bim, and this eaesod tat) nmntlsii Iii swerve round, and it eollided th pfcactoBV Mm aad ao time ta get out of tha The rmnitmi was' rnne it lat Mia tf t. li.i part of the omnibus struct the waa zmach damaged.

Ha was thrown under taa wheels. Tao plaintiff waa thrown into the gutter. The rbrufcn was on the proper side of the road. Frederick Hall said, he was a printer ressdiiig at Hackney. He saw the accident.

He was standmroa tba left side of the road going tenrards tha east aad had a dear view. Ha saw plaintiff's phaeton gobsg west. It was en its proner side about a foot from the kawki The market eart eras going towards the east in tee centre of the road. Tie oamibus. was behad it.

The omnibus tried to pass the cart oa the further side froa where he waa siaadinri les wheats skidded eat bui line aad caught tha phaeton Vy the brake. He saw the plaintiff fall out of the on' to his aide. Herbert Fisher said he witnessed. the accident The market cart waa 6ft, from the kerb. The cmaibos was going the same oirectico as tba eart.

Its wheels skidued on the tram line and struck the phaeton. Be picked the plaint id up. Dr. D'Arcr Adams sail ha waa a doctor til mwiiot'ro practising at Maida Yale. He had knows tha lor five or six rears.

Ha n)TM to bm "him April 11. and examined him earefally. Ho found him a weak eoodition. Hb waa sofensr great pahs ia the back and had flying; pains in his liaxba. Ha akin was tn a sabby condition and.

he complained of coM ness aid numbness. There was great teoderness oa his the spine. He had ao doubt he was. Ir7 general health at the preseut time was good, bat he had not got over the nervous shock to his system, Cross xmiced. There was no bruise or discolouration on the plaintiff's body when ha examined him.

There was no lesion of the spinal cohmm, 1 TIT m. ic 00 WM fellow of Koyal College of Surgeons and was surgeon at St. George's Hospital. He saw the plaintiff oa April .13. In eoBsultatioa with Dr.

Adams, be made a complete examination. He found him suffering from the following objective symptoms Slow intermittent pulse, cold, elammy skin, furred tongue, aad he moved with great difceulry and pais. He found tnat there waa a tender spot on the loin. The plaintiff always flinched when this spot was touched. He complained of a sensation of pms and needles la his arms and legs.

He saw the plaintiff again on May 29. His condition Was unproved, but he still complained of the tiaghng sensation in his limbs and also of cramp, lie had aa attack of cramp while undergoing; ezascnatioa. This could not have been assumed. When walked be pulled his left leg after him. There was nothing to show or make him believe that the plaintiff was shamming.

On the 37th of November he again examined him, ia consultation with Dr. Eeeror. The dragging of the leg had ceased, and he was ia much better health. He seemed in a low and desponding state and said he was afraid he would become paralysed, of TS1P not as great as it should bes; lie (witness) did not think that there was any lesion, but there was functional disturb aace of the spue. He saw no bruises.

He should not have expected to have found bruises, because the injury was' aa indirect injury. Mr. Charles Beevor, Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons, was then called, and corroborated the last witness. The plaintiff's wife aad other witnesses were calWd to prove that before the accident the plaintiff had.been ia good health and ia a strong condition. 'Ibis concluded the plaintiff's case, aad the further hearing of the case was adjournedttill to morrow mors ing.

(Before Mr. Justice Charles sud Speeial Jury. THOMAS ERAY3HAW AND J. L. BRAYSHAW V.

W. O. MOCSTORD, W. MOCETORD, AND ARTHUR DENT. The hearing of this action which, began yesterday was resumed to day.

The plaintiff's claim was against all the defendants for a return of money amounting to 1,956 Cj. 5d. obtained from tha plaintiffs by fraud and for damages for fraudulent misrepresentations oa the sale of shares. The defendanU denied the making of any false' representations ss alleged, or that tLe PUJ dent fur shares WIS mids in rmumtHmn nf in. representations of the defendants, or either of themot any one on their behalf, or that the ptirchases were induced by any of the matters set forth ia the statement of claim.

Mr. McCaU, Q.C, and Mr. T. II. Whitehouse were for the piamtiffa Mr.

Willis, Q.C. Mr. Cock, Q.C, and Mr. F. M.

Abrahams for the defendants W. G. S. Moekford and W. C.

Mockf oid and Lord Coleridge, Q.C, and Mr. Percy Uye for the defendant Arthur Dent. Mr. McCaLL. is the course of his oprninj on Monday, referred to various companies which were known as the Moekford group, sad ia the first place asked the jury to dioniss anything they had heard regarding them from their minds.

This action had reference to only two of these companies, but in order to follow what took place it would be necessary to detail the circumstances attending tbe earlier companies. lo79, Mr. Moekford, who had been a chemist, carrying on business ia some part of London, somehow or another became pcssed of a large tract of land in the Transvaal, which for many years remained a white elephant on his hands. In however. She stir is the African gold fields arose, aod it then occurred to him to float the first of the companies with which his name has been connect ed.

The company waa called the Harmony Proprietary Company (Limited) and had a capital of a million pounds, and was registered on March 23, 18vd. The memorandum of association was signed at Mr. MocEfor i's hooe, probably, as one learned Judge had said, in the back parlour, and all the signatories were members ef Mr. Mock ford's family. A contract was entered into the same day by which the comtxny took over the lands in the? Transvaal, belonging to Mr.

Moekford, and all the shares, except' the seven subscribed for by the signatories to the memorandum, were allotted to Mr. Moekford. He (Mr. McCall) 'would pause here to remark that tha Legislature never intended that a man should make himself into a company and constitute himself both vendor and purchaser. Tee next step was to cut up the big tract ef land and form subsidiary companies to buy them.

The first company so formed was the Sutherland Reefs Company, and the method adopts 1 be lore was followed again, the wife, daughters, aad governess of Mr. Mockiord appearing aa signatories: Further, the share capital of this company was allotted to Mr. Moekford as the consideration for granting a lease, in perpetuity of the property. The shares actually, went to a premium of 10, although there was no reason for it. Then followed, oa October 4, ls9, the Excelsior Estates Company, the first One concerned in this action.

It was formed in the same way exactly as the other two, with 500,000: for capital, all toe shares, except the seven taken by the family of Mr. Mockiord.being allotted to Mr, Moekford. The company was thus formed pursuance of a seneme or plan by which Mr. Moekford bad thu whole of the capital in his hands to do with it what he liked and not to carry on any bena Jtde tnsineas or with any bona fide object, and in pursuance of this scheme a proe pectus was prepared and sent out on September .37, 1889, accompanied by the following: latter 18, Great Winchester street, London, E.C, Sep te nber 27, 1889. Dear Sir, Herewith you will receive prospectus, Ac, of the Excelsior Estates (Limited).

This company has been so largely privately subscribed that it is unnecessary to advertise it. 1 have1 decided to give the shareholders of the Sutherland Reef (Limited) an opportunity of taking some fully paid up shares at par, at which only a I united number will be sold. If yon would like to have some, please let me know in coarse of post how many you would like to hare. On Tuesday, upon going through all the replies received up to then, either yen will get the number you apply for or a pro raia proportion should the application bo is excess of the number I have decided to sell at par. Yours faithfully G.

S. MOCXEORD." This document was false, no companr was is existence, neither had any shares been subscribed for as stated. (The learned counsel then went' on to read portions of the prospectus, pointing, out various misstatements therein, and adding that it was se answer for the defendants to tar that if the plaintiffs had been as crafty as themselves ther would probably have discovered the fraud.) Moekford proceeded to give certain brokers and jobbers the sight to call for share in the Excelsiur Estates Company at par, and thus a snffkieat demand was created for the shares. One of the circulars and a prospectus was sent to the plaintiffs, and the statements made therein induced them to purchase shares, in all COO. through Messrs.

Redmayna aad Co. Four hundred of these ware transferred direct by Mr. Moekford te Mr. Thomas Brayshaw, and the rest by a Mr. ask ell, who was.

employed for tha pur pos of unloading his shares by Mr. Tha plxintiffa case was that this was a clear attempt by Mr. Moekford, together with his son and his see in law'. Mr. Dent, to palm off worthless shares oa tbsv public, and he (Mr.

McCaU) would ask the jury to say that the circular aad prospectus were false and: fraudulent to the knowledge of the defendants, aad. that as to the shares bought by the plaintiffs they were entitled to lecover their money back and interest thereva from the data of its payment. On October 15. 1S9. a further company waa registered, called the Potsdam Reefs (Limited) with capital.

Aa exactly similar course was adopted to that used oa tbe bringing out of the Excelsior Estates (Limited), wtta tbis difference, that the agreesnent for sale by the parent company, Mm Harmoay lreatielary Comfaay tuaiuij, gnmami tnat uotu, in ausmoa so raid mining claims ttwrsui deseriDed. pay (Limited) 25.000 ra cash imaediatelr oa tha cxecutiaa of tha agreemeat, to form a working capital lor. tba Fotsdsm Reefs (Limited). similar eircular was isaned wikk the prospectus, which' set oo7t provisiea capital. The facta sarroQSksBg; tne TsrWistiM ottaa parent cessaajrbe had already ana1 tit 1.

east aisslil ha temeexwi tbat ta taalssWa eabttsi waa oaaul by Mr. Moekford. It aaasas tkat Xr. MssaJasd aetusllr did par ll.0ew towards taa aW.m. the sr petairits 1 to rvteisia as a loam br taa: ta" has 'mshsbs of sbbbo ec ate taa ranees rr Tnk'S (:.