The Times from London, Greater London, England • Page 3

the times; toesmy, man 1st, COLLEGES. rTOUO SCHOOLS, QT.CIKORGB'S HOSPITAL "KDICXL SCHOOL, iirR cvSoxot a nutter. aSSS. uaux now Accett JSUtnn ana but la reamtt at aos Toi a 'r H'lMa( tU CCO n(nlli( wmLISSS (vfc tetr Aaavta A wrU of CIXe mTwI toatta Otrator. CM 1 Mnl aad iiial THOMAS WHUttAM.

Do. rrT HOSPITAL MKOIOAL SCHOOL. Tb rKK SWMiW. iViMMlUeCSS an Thtvwle. Me '22re, Cktfaw Mi for etaJrrit rTrvt tot JJ5i tt futon of AH Arrw.taal A eUlrUy fa CHARITIES, In.

OKDOK FEVER HOSPITAL, Urtrpool rotd, ST. MART'S HOSPITAL, Pmadlnftoa. rCXM emit NUOStX TUOMiLa BTAX mnmut. T1IR HOSPITAL for WOMEN, tfclH quar. rPXPS utwll KKXSUX OATUl CAXXUX.

BorUrt. UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL, Oowr ttreeV FUND wrreotly RRqUlBXa aL 1L KIXOH, ewer. larr. aktr CoUtadOuL, tiB.reod. ONDON HOSPITAL.

Whltehapl rYd, B. The SUKSCR1FTIUXA (HOUwMUUrw (mnlUirmlrt IS. auSaJtVO, QKAMENU HOSPITAL (late DrtutdnoughO.Green kj wkw. 8tiroc tar ntnuq twinboum aad fre to tfci bols bvUm orM. rUKLNI srU KtCKrt.

i aiiuuu, riee etar. ROTAL LONDON OniTIIALMIO HOSPITAL, wwelda. IC rOXIM ar Bach KEDKD. DniUxu ui eeauel taea nMioot rerwi et br.Ueeera. WUUtat.

Dwh. tad Co lleakm, tUneVian, ul ry bbntET J. NRWSTEAD. 8fUr. iiuv na t'" rt i ath iuth I XT XT JKSM i3 OO.MMKJTC JL" 1 4 rruunnicoMiiK cwllkok.

wnii. ij rvirt 4 Iwkta. uv i. THK ALKXANDRA HOSPITAL for HIP USKAR la Clltl.tRKX. gaMiani.

W.C, oi.loJ. an artratl SEKDKD la aalaUM bU. Uaakm Mai. lloan as4 Hum. Itouaia4.

J. STKXrCNSON. BMnUrr IAST LONOON HOSPITAL for CHILDREN" and ana traai tka nUf deaUlatloa o( tb uanni4atsl hi tali arub. bourhvi, ffwmiu nai a ll aal arrrnt Afi'KAL XN lt in aeMat aaiit. AsUrOS Ut.

BatnUr. CHKYN'K HOSPITAL for SICK and INCUK AHUC CH1UUIKN. W.r lk. Ca.bu. For trv laallrWa at fHal IxKptiaU.

The CeonaiUaa aaniaMl aolml ri'Krut. AnwailM deublai lat aataaia, atac puiul nm aljr aaiUat aJmiata. av IUaII.S AU BLCJtT. Sc. 1AII.KY CXiLuKGK.

lo fanr BarUnla Al.VKRN COLLKCSK. TSSK. SS DS Ami ii. a oaltaaat CtatoaAl aa4 Uia UnDtnal Ortift. nalni aarataaoiiwiai la Cdntn LY1NO IN HOSPITAL, NarrltTOht, X.W.

ratraa IIrr AJ KSTY la OU KKK. Prrn4't VolaaUrriWitnbatioaa. t'pH of 1,000 poor i rtUftal aaaaali. rLKDS BifaaUr NKEDKI). ETROPOLITAN HOSPITAL.

XT JL Tba naiMiaf. hall, at comrlttal ActtJntu admUWd at all hours fna. paal aania for Jr.tth wiUraU art no oprad. llMpitalU wnrantoa atrtrtl rmidaal prindplai. Ittila Uoa, aa ad radiiu, lilOCO.

FUN artaatlf NF.EUrP to nirBUncBt tfca ntatrlptloai of watlU. CoatntxrUOM thaaMullr racaiTail, a ad inanaUon rvan at ItarpiUl, Klnolaal raaa, CMARLtS IL BTKRS, S4cmarr. nICllGATE SCHOOL. iTtrro FoundaUoo Miudix CK ri Eitruoe Scbolaftilr. CQ CSX 4 1 KltavMMJaatiaaaJU.

For fanVe MRfcvlan iS a taa O. Km DoatS. DlD, SrsMlaxa. atta, MUe. Iki'IVBr GRAMMAR SCHOOL ENTRANCE Jl rMtaafvhanraMaaarM'IUtiBiUootlwtaricuUnu C.

I ivaalBan. IUmI. A. SraooJ, 11. I tirrvna.

A. OL Faraa tMr. Allaai. M.A, ifk Scaoot, BrUhaoal U. Cocks.

A. K.r It Iijauli. F. Batt, A SL KcCmj Kr. A.

Oot (sna, rfUIK MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL, 3Iortimr tm 1. Th Wrtl. IWrt tnk an ttiml ArrKAL forKKW ANNVAl. Uera barbx baaa a aanaUamhla 1 fal'taf off c( Uu rara, Th llarriul mntaiai K7 bnla, Tba mmbrr ri la patlniU trrmtad lattaaraaa tMo, aad at ntftlkili 3a.Ua laaama from ixm dunnr lha rait rar ruiilf CllTJa, b0 tha lpaadUura I to karini Irgcworr at otct 1.114 to niaJa ap QXPOrO) LOCAL EXAMIXATIOXS. London Kmitut (lt.yrC.Tbm EXAMINATION a CUMKtNCK Job 5Ot at tfca LooJoa aiwaisj.

ramctaalrTBataarUiBOaorbrfor Blaatb to tha Sra tory. K. lArsaa, lol, iiariaawV Tacapla, TURILEE of thr) METROPOLITAN CONVA LSSCE.VT IsrSTirrTluX Waltaaa TUreM, i kiaiataaJiUl. and ItothUa JUa, which Dow wtaln 603 naaa, OU pon atalamit rafrDU a.tnittl irartr fraa of cjMaka. Iloaval I pm all tba jaar round.

I'll l)t nnnUr Idkl i aaara looUoo Jotsl stock IUa. fa. raU maU. B.W. Ottra KackriUatmi, loodno, W.

CHAKLXS HOLME3. eaeratar. 31 WOLFF RAM. Th Mmor hn, Le, S.E. AULITAKY CXl rETXTT VE.

Marrb. ltd At tb rteect EranrnHfrw bal ta Murk. ISJi tb toUoa irx ZiiH V'i een paaavd trom hia attabUahmaot 1 MiKa ilry.a.lm Ard wj, Catar. aod lnfaol.7 CaaAMata.1 r1 lnfantrr lefftBtr lefaptrr lafaatiT IsfaaUT laraatrf laraetrr Liaat. K.

Oy Urattl. K. Ma. nab LiocV A. F.

Bobiaa'al LaraU 1. T. Honoa Ural. 'A. 3.

ter 4 LSCS un 1.63 LT4 Urtsc A. W. Unut LSSj I riUSTa dariax tba laat thn laara Is'astrr lirat. Mirtra LTS3 lafaatrr H. TmT 1.53 lar uuiamun LTSl ljUV t.otrr Tra MuUarr Cbmrasiita ClaMck ar under dtrtcuon of MfctKio: J.

Nfvdbam. R.M.A. T.S Utf lofrararat larbaatna aad laairurtnr in Taetas aad aliSujT Topivrapli at A X. OaLcaa, tirranaicn, aad Icrrarriy Uamaaa loalruolor. LXTIA COMPETITIVE.

reh. 190. VIUTU rtPT 4 vjCtKNMORE. HrmU krat. ntvW MAJOR lLAll iL Mmr iuu, ttk tart K.S.

lTuiUpv ITU i U. xxrt. Sn.O IL rivmtXlt laaC four out of nio act TO th. CHAKITA nLK. FUNDS are nrntlT NEEDED for tba GREAT NOHTllKIUt CEKTKaC IIOS FlTAlk UoUawaaoad.

Ji. Varr poor. t. aad naaa.taad. WILUAM T.

OKANT. tlaentarr. rTUIE UOYAL SEA DATHINO INFIRMARY I. few SCROFULA. Foandad at MarfaUs I71t TbU Inalitafcon, onlj oaa la tba United Kinrdam for tba treaUntnt aielaanal; arrofnla.

opaa a tba Tar round, bat Hi bada. Tba IMractora ra rrrt to to aanouaoa to tba pablia tbat Ibct ara raroetaatl eon peUad to alow las warda, avini to nut of funda. K. RITTH VKN YM, Traanrsr. A IA rEIhX'K, Bacrrtar.

00.cn, Cbarict aran, 8.W. EAST LONDON NURSING SOCIKTV lands trainad nurat. Into bonm of tick poor, andrr kiUd matron, hparithet taoaBUd oat of IX. FUNDS NKtDll) to eomrlaU adttaw. Trnnmi Hon.

Mra. Stnart WorUa aad l'rrcj Wifrain, Ki. ISantarr. A W. Lacar.

43, FbUpoWatran, Commarcial road, E. THE EAST END MOTHERS' HOME (lata Sbadaall ItjlnraL 3K. Aa nreot Al'FEAt Uj3d or FPXD3 to pa oil tba debt eontractad to parrbaaff lb abo, freebald proprrty. Ontnbationa moon and farottart wCl ba thaokfallr raoalrad by Mra. AAbton Vparnrr, Lad SuprinUodeat at tba lloaa.

ROYAL NATIONAL LIFEBOAT INSTITUTION brvoluntary oootriaaUooaL Tta Cotnmittaa aaracsC AFFEAL for FUN tw. ta anabia tbaa to karp tbau lar Cart of 233 lifeboat la eOoent vorkin order. Help naadrd at tba prneal tiai. Slora lt2l tba limitation hl trantad aardi tba aa.inf of nearij JbJXI litea. on tba coaiu of tba Unitad Kinriom.

Annual auM nptioni and Dooationa wdl ba thankfully ranirrd by tba lcrrUiT. Cbarlea Dibdin. (au 14. Jobn aUaal, Addnhi. W.C and ly all tba llaakl la tba United Kingdom.

LAW REPORT, April ZL HE COLONIAL COLLKGK And TRAINING UD1M. ni nl Bay. SeSoik. For tba Tiaunaf el Yoatba for CaUmial Ufa, la. rroaTaotaa on appiation to tba wt Uirrctor.

WHAT to do ith jtwr SONS. Jourr.aIini. Mr. DAVID ANDFE50N. Sti London.

Astbor of Soma OaisnstiUna ISTX' a pnnctpal laaaar arar. ataoj trawpoiidrnU andcrlUo of tb I'aily Tatecrapb. IM 'rirn5LSi, of JorKN ILMK. splendid Kaolu fratVctn, (rre. A traiaad InruX rant from S3 to a aar.

1 HOTELS, to. BURR'S. Qawa aqsare. London, W.O., neAr BnUab Maaeaa. KaKXni nrt here.

Badraoaa. breakfut. aaadaaoa. ca. anta djioar at oel k.

ta. Naeuu. rini dLc fcaaaifaraJTjitqr. UmL Mj. and Ha ISUiLB.

Fropnaum. BURLINGTON HOTEL.Cark stre. aad Old Bar kajMMSwi, lanloa. W. Tb oidart MUbUtbad and aoat jaiat tamu Ue Wettest.

A faa atrpa froa Bond atraaA, rwrhly. aad BarUntevbeaa OaSrt raaa jr galliam. alao a aa cjS raea. naalae naa aa ikiai Very aMktoata tanS. Cndrr aaaa saaaraicnt Bacuaraaai Palvsa Hotel Buek avcaawala.

Loalan. r. dEUttQE OUOalE, btanaftr. TliaM la KTft rm iS ft JO SHIPWRECK or DISASTKRof the SKA can of dtl tuta aido ant orpbinJ, At. at tba bead, of Tb 8HIFWKECKKI) FISHEKMKX and MARISKKS' KOVAL.

UF.XE VOLKNT KCIETY. tonndad S3 faara. aa ibe Xattoaal Maritime Kelief Orraid saUon of tba Kmpira. Total rrlierad, 416.102 penooa. liuutaud liij rncorpowl 1SS3 nader patranaf of ILM.

Tb Qoao. and of Admiral H.R.1L tbe lhtkr of EdlnOorzU. FUXIU are ruwitly AFFEALED for by the Board of Manaca onl lnktra M'tUiamt, Daaroo, and Uo. Becratarr li. Back, 15 Badon' Uonw cbambera, Docketravt, London.

K. BAILEY HOTEL, Gloacettfr road, Kensington. Tb cttraait altrauooa aad addition to tbia Ilotei, eoav a adutuoal Bam and bed room, are now eompleted. A aev Ameneaa ban ereetol and tb kooa fitted with toe aieetnc lifbi tiirookbaat. eeerj attention bariat been dmcied to tbe mtm nwde euuwry imBraeemeata.

Tb Hotel now eoctaina cer a Mrtaecta, and tie public aad ornate rooau are repfet yak rear poanb eonresiene end comlorv JAJ1E4 BAILEY. Frapnetor kuo.of tbe South Keuctnstoa Hotel, 4necaVcate tarfaoB, A.W4. XNNS of COURT FAMILY HOTEL. Hih Hol Hm aod Loodoa. W.C Central, quiet, and ensraodwoa.

breatlaut. dlanen, tz. table dliote S.X mjt Hydrvauc LAa, Electric Arteeian well water. ANGHAM HOTEL. Portlani placf.

London. W. XJ Tee Boat orateoleat, and healthy I icslU. Table laohitteAX. weidinz breacfaau.

ate. ArVaian well water. Kie tnc lirbt throccboat. Moderate tenS. Coder to new maaaf a.

kwntof Sir. WAITER COaDEX. LIMMER'S HOTEL, Condait atrcct, This old erutJu ied bovd, aauase ia tha eentre of tb Weu nl, roo end gentlemen. Tbe baoanetioc tl a ipacud adar4d for oifVcUai dutaen and eddisx break ta. Addreai tbe Froprictor.

BRIGHTON. Too GRAND HOTEL. South etpaet Crtad entranoa ball, rcorption roonu. dinin and table bole noma. Hich ciaea wince, French caiiiai, oataiJe nre tuaeaeer hf man cold are water bath.

Tbe hotel la fitted nuciiout with eienric lijrht. Terms ru pennon Iul bd. per diea lor a riaa or oot lea titan thne dayv notice beia kiren ou amral, "l1 boarderi eoeber will be rossUad. TariS on application to toe Manacar. HYDROPATHIC CRAIGLOCK EibiHUJOl.

Masnibcent VJt, Boi ta (ttrre railea fro. trtetl umnileu ..177 jT7 Jr.H naatan riad. eloae tcttbe Elbibttlon. ueeoay, toe jCJan inax. WESTBOURNE PRIVATE H'lIIOrm nlly ritaated In the Weo End.

lactnz aea and Fn ate bu, room wub bed roena. from teorul aa. Apartaiesta. wnh baerd. ty, rMaa.

W. BALTEE. Fraprietor. T9L.Ki: CUFFHOTEL. Patrorir Uu.ttLaroK K.j Tna Hmi been ualoToil pr aiaee.Jane.

and taa Mdrtrartarallximpel Onl tn aairwM Froprietor. ROYAL BEACH 1IAVSU1VS Itiirvr o. a W.JU. OUUQaa. XX.

Coder sew nius nl Ilna iCaaa family boieL nldi.a trend iew of tbe KniiieoCWlS el Ibr Wifbt. 170 apartm ota. Term mjdenae. Celebrated HOMELESS BOYS of LONDON. FUNDS are srrrnU XEEI7ED for the rappon of tbe boy, and rirlf on the trauunc atuae Aretboaa and Cbicheeter Trndar and.

tbe aeven home oaaaorenacWtbeaaaaeemest of the Omamtttee of the National for lloraaleaa Beys and Deetitnte Cbildren. early 1.0X boy and tuil are bow bcux aapportoS la tb Bhlp aod Conuicntioni reooited April 14th ta 19th toe iierueee aotrx eneral Parpoaea. 3 3 0 Mra la Faet 1 CO 1 I 0 i Mr. W. J.

Falaer 0 13 0 Mr. F. Pert. 20 3 IS 0 Mi E. 8.

Btoo 10 0 1 10 Oolonel H. tioatlino 1 1 0 Murray 110 2 0 0 Mr. W. J. 110 2 I 0, Mr.

K. IL Morrtce 100 110 M' a M. Prerd 10 0 1 10 Admiral Oaors Farker 2 0 0 Mr. IL ltokehr Price 110 I Hjor Uenl. kLCDilon, I iLA 2 2 0 1 0 Mia K.

A. Creniid 2 0 1 00 Mr. I O. OrimUdi 100 1 I 0 Ir. Alfred 110 IS 0 0 I Mr.

J. Noble 10 0 0 4 OCjBmallSuma 6 14 Mr. J. la Chapman Iter. Uanon raber Mr.

W. Faber Mia A. Ilado Mr. J. Tieoen Mr.

a IL Watt 8. M. Mr. J. Newbald Mia K.

Newman Mra Yate J. W. a. Stock Ex chance, eeoonl of LaMWte Mra. Alexander Mia R.

A. Kell Mra Moriton H. K. Coloael F.WJrwdi(aU Mr. NewtoQ For the Trainins Ship AretSuna and Chirh ater Tender.

tieucrel Hutchmaon 1 2 0 Mia E. a Mtoae i 0 Mr. F.O. Beatifrlde Mr. A.

Uaaipfyide Ezmonlh Tbe Hon. Mn. Howard 1 II 01 Inaon 100 air. at. li.

U. Eoclrbrart 6 0 01 I' It. Wlnnr Contnlajtiona are earnestly anliciled. aad will be thakfully reeeif ed by tbe London aod Weauninster bank, 214. Ilib Holbnrn, and or tbe Brrr WILUAM WILLIAMS.

enalWDOryoue. Bhanesaaryreene, W.U. HOME of RKST for HORSES, Frin Place Farm, Acton, w. President Tbe I'CK of PURTLAKD. Paokers Hrum Conn, and i 8 trend.

ADDITIONAL FCXDd matiy NEEDKD. KSUTIIIliLAND SAFTORD. Seeretary. Oaea, lii Tietorlvtieet, B.W ALAD 1 1 years of age, sole means of labsist 'oe Is. per day and dinn IS'tndiys eseeptedL In return for hi boars' aetne work, is sorely PRESSED lor to pay debt Incurred dunnc a eere Ulnou.

LandUdy holds wardrobe, threateas to elL Mia The Institute. 1 jti, Befenttreet. A WIDOW, aced 60. with daughters and jrrand dauibters, nrcentl NEEDS 3)j at once, to py etpeeiKS incurred tbruuai sicknra aad deatb. Ke'erencce reaaired.

Donatio a thantfully receired on their behalf by Kei. Prebendary Reynold. 2. Carl ton road, Tufnel park. N.

ROSES. CLEARANCE SALE. A Bplendid col lectioa of Hyceid Perpetual includinf the moat beautiful and popular aorta. Ftee dwarfs or bttthee, our anie eton, trimmed, ready for planum, per dosaa Sa, for 3t, 2S for IX, or 15. per lei Fackinc and carnace free for caab with order.

DAXILB lUiOA. Tewn Caoae Xarstsio. Mcurwich. ILIUM AURATfM. Tho beautiful Golden rayed lily of Japan.

Maarmaet nt pot tn the crrenhoiiee or the open oiden. Deiieioasly soented, quite hat dr. Planted now will bljom plendidly duria tbe autmi n. ire (elected roots, per 4a. 6 six for 2s.

or Jj to. td. Kttra Sue roots, per don sis for 4a 6d. or 2b for 16e. Cimm frew fw caab with ordat DANIELS BKOia.

Tou cloae Kuneries. Noreich. ORrsSEL3. HOTKLdelEUROPE.11acenoy.le. oted for tu eutaine Inch lb, best in UnuseUl, good wme, mode talecharies.

and cumforv Address tb Manacor. rjRAND CANARY HOTEL SANTA CATA X7 LIN A. rTbe fiaert winter climate the world) Tbls eharm. 4r hotel fe tbe aea. ierurraaded by tu own ajtifully Utd out r.

ia Tbe hotel Is railete with modern Improrem at. Eerr raaroa mar be oUare at the o3l of tb CAXAUY. laLANDSCO WFA NY, L'LaTetic Foontaey btU, London, E.C. IXTAY 15th. OPENING of the GRAND AXVFES t'ndrrtakeo by Mme 8ClloSFrTEIi I jpnetor of the ILVel ae I pltcr, at ItroaeU.

HARDY FLOWERING l'LANTS plendid irum nd aVUtutxiQ bloomlnt pTeanuJ far the per m.Dt.t decoration of tha ffarden. Jx 1 itranc t'Uoti from Po' A. tor Im naMi.UA latttuc oat, faclulias Aq Lb emit ptvlliiia, lltfietuum ikibUjeo, Phloxes, He UcIkmcv arittit, U. 6J six tor 7. for or for 3X Cifriit fi ee for ctW.

vui. onUr. DAMCUH liiiOi. Trwn ciom Nurtcne. enrich.

Gb UIOLI or SWOKD LILII maificcht rootr.1 for tho opeo rtu Jea. prod Ado; rrmad tHu of brillint vdiS chnaine oolmird flowort ia kuiump, pUolnuv. Chmoo rt.tnei gru, ir fa. Scl for or Hit tor Einerb zhituuan ixnUoK rert elioio. dux.

Ltv. six for 1 reUrH, mixed. Tttbout nmci per ONEY LONDON and WESTMINSTER LOAN n. IIW' XT COMPANY 'UmlteW ADYAXCES mad, Iti LasX P'saottaf security, deeds, rntturc tdlls of a reTeraians. lYOaectuJi cent on apttiicauca.

A III AlaJ.r3 11 llla.la 06. Wwvll U. lit. Martin a rpAIiLE KNIYUS. MAPPIN and WEBB'S rpABLErKNIVES Patat Secure handle rAlILE KNlYES are the 'best.

rUIiLE KNIVES Warranted quality. rpVBLE K.NIYES In Case for fPABLK KNIYES Illatratcd Price Lirt. port tree, from tba APPIJJ and WKBB London Warehou, tAPaelln .1 iu n.r, ar APPIN and AVKBB' The Manufactorj, Royal yrri prsx wonaikreet. A Xi.IJ,LESALE FURNITURE MANUFAC tiikil'i tZ uhc 8ELL I itly tt CONTENTS of bis RE i 1 i. eould reiaia.

Furniture ail special a 1 new Eiceptl'maliy Ijm pneu. Nine rd iaf. aod aorniral ra. l.Lrary. reception reel, ICKLTT VALUES for PROBATE and PUR C3A.SL.

PLATE and JEWELLEll Y. PliII7 SUrersmith, A Trhnat, 4L OtJor letre W. (near Xorth cU. At, liettrnt for cash or eichanted. SESE? MND ACT.

1882 Mr. DAVIS, ot Art, Is desirous of WtL ri Wort' c' An. anl bibiaa Tio M) nKb Dutch tctwela. VtittaUona aod CHOICE FLOWER SEEDS for SPRING. 1890.

TWELVE beauuful VAU1LTIIU easy eiliurt specially selected fir tbe opn rarlea, an i indn lux tba foUowicjr splendid eaanrtiKea with full cuiural directions Ast r. bnerf doabl i Xaartl4m. Tn Thumb Csndytult, choice tailed Stook. 19 week, finest double ti. new.

Uixe Dowered Hwoet Fras. epl ndid ml led Mi nosette, sem soented I Pansy, eboiee nvsel bcarirt Uoam Cla Kia iotesnpetala, be. Post free Is, 21, two kru 2s. 2L. f.ur peckeu 2d.

Sown now will produce a broiuat JjLsy tkrtratheai the simmer and autumn. aitifully lllu tr.t 1 ttalosne of Sesds and Plant, with band. td te. Iic wita each order. DANIELS UKOA.

Toe ifueen seeismen, Norwich. CARTERS' SEEDS of BEAUTIFUL FLOWERS. II har ly eariebea, of eaey cultKatiori, prior 2s. post free. 2 bard 'tenet, of rmrj cnltiraU m.

piice post tree. Carters 1. W. bos contaius ia packcU vf popular annuals, prrenulali, sw etawntled eeerllsUns flowers. Bent post Ire 0' rec ipt of poaUa! order for Js.

Carters' 21. ti eUia' 3 Urje packets of popular annuals, perennial, eaeet eornted fljrtn, ererlaaiinrs, ornamental toliace't. and (iwiKmi aeeds. Kent poet fre on rroraot of tnatal order for 21a. lilber bose fnee ISs, jls 42s 63s.

and upwards. FartuUrs jf eontenis rratis and pott fre on application to Carters, ,31 Ilish II Jboro. U.ndon. PERMANENT arid BEAUTIFUL LAWNS, with rlret tarf are, can formed in eiht or twslre week by CARTERS IXVICTA LAWX SEEDS. Frlee Is, Is.

and 2s. Cd. packet, post fre. Price la 3d. per pound, to sow oue rod of crouod.

Price 25. per bushel. Four bushels sow one acre. All parcels curiae free. GARTERS GRASS SEEDS for TENNIS LAWNS.

Price K. Is. (4, and 2s. 60. per packet Is.

per pound ISl per basheL Camac trr. rAVTNS and LAWN TENNIS GROUNDS how to manaretbetn. Bee CARTERS' PAMPHLET. Itretia and poet free from tlarter. Sedtm by Royal Warrant to ILM.

The vtueen nod 1LH.IL ta Irinc of Wales, 237 aad 233, Ilish Ualbora, London. ONDON SEASON. ISOO. DIAJIONDS. WATHE RSToX and SOX.

12. Pall mall east. LONDON SEASON. FlXSEXT3. WATUElioT0X 1890.

WEDDING nod BOS. 12, FaOmaU LONDON SEASON, 1830. 8ILVER PLATE. WATHERSTOX an 1. SON, 12.

Paa aall tba (adJoiBiat Xm ZfaUowal UtJaorL LsatUa HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION, Btftrt Lord Ooliridoi i Ha. Jcitici Uatbkw.) iiolxby y. slack. Thll tu a cue from tba County Court ot Bkeptoa whleh rale4 a turiooa point on letting of a boo.

There was a draft agreement tot a yearly tenancy at a eertaia rent for tbe ftht year, a certain rent for tba sue oral, and a certain rent for the third, bat with a clause that it thonld be from year to year, subject to the usual six months' notice to quit, and this draft, tgned by tbe landlord, waa bent to the tenant, who alto ifned it, and aent It back to the landlord, who bad two coplet naJo of it, and aent tbem both, algned by himself, to tbe tenant, who algned them both, and aent one back to tbe landlord and retained the other. Tba one be sent to the landlord contained tbe clause to a yearly tenancy sublet to a six mouth' notice, but the copy be retained, by a mistake in copying, did not contain that clause, and when the landlord in the econd year gare the tenant a tlx months' notice to quit, hei insisted that it waa tenancy for three year certain, and refused to giro up. The County Court Juilge, howerer. looked at tho original draft algned by both, and held that thia abowed what the real contract waa, and care judgment for the landlord. The defendant appealed.

Mr. CACHET appeared for the defendant In tupport of bia appeal, and urged that the doctrine a to leajea applied by analogy, and that it waa the tenant's copy which must prevail. (Lord' Coleridge, howerer, pointed out that thia waa not a lease by deed, and the doctrine applied to deed. Sltt. Jcsticx Vathevt said thia wa a mere question of contract, of which tbe writing were only eridcoee, and the question waa which waa tbe true contract between the parties.

Lord Co LIB. I rc The County Court Judge, in order to ascertain, looked at tbe original ot tho contract signed by both parties, and surely that was a rational course to adopt. It Is submitted that it wa not the right course on a lease, even a lease by parol, for there may be a lease at ill by parol or writing not under eeal not exceeding three years, and the old doctrine appliea Bare be 11 T. Clark," 2 C. P.

Lord Coleridge. That ease may ahow what tbe old doctrine was, but it does not apply to such a cue a this. Tbe doctrine is that tbe lessee's counterpart cannot prcrail against tbe lease. It waa tbe document delivered to tbe tenant which must prevail as the lease. The landlord should have had the agreement rectified or pat right in a Court of equity.

(Mr. CniTTT, on the other aide, aaid tbe landlord did net know of tbe mistake, as tbe tenant bad sent him back tbe copy in which there was the clause in question, ami kept the ether in which it was not. The landlord, by bis own mistake, misled the tenant, who might fairly rely upon an agreement sent to him signed by himself. At all CTents the notice could not be given during tbe first two years. Mr.

Chitty wa not called upon. The Court came to the conclusion that the County Court Judge waa right. If there were clearly a document containing tbe terms of tbe letting or the agreement, of course that alone could be looked at. But that waa not the case here, and the original draft waa looked at, not to affect or construe the contract, but to ascertain what it waa. There were aereral writing and they differed, and' tbe two copies differed aa to a certain clause, and ao they did not ahow what the contract was, and therefore tbe original draft was looked at.

and rightly ao. It was a document br which undoubtedly both parties were bound, being signed by and that showed what the agreement waa, which could not be ascertained from tbe copies, as tbey differed, and it had to be found which of them was correct. Arpeal accordingly dismissed. Judgment for tbe piaiuiiu, Btfort Mr. Barox Hcddlkstox and Mr.

Jcsticx uraxtham.) oakxy hall y. brtci. This appeal against an order of Mr. Justice Day, in an action bv Mr. Oakev Hall, who in 18Gy 70 was Mayor of New York, against Mr.

Bryce, M.P., for auegeu iiteis in tna mm cnaptcr oi on work on "The American Commonweal," waa resumed to I day. The plaintiff bad obtained from Mr. Justice I Charles, at Judges' Chambers, leave to administer interrogatories to tba defendant as to the matters involved in tbe libel and on the part of tbe defendant an order wa obtained from Mr. Justice Day for particulars of the matters alleged by the plaintiff to be untrue in the libel published. This was an appeal by the plaintiff against that order, on the ground that the defendant must be taken to know what was charged in the libel he bad published, and that the onus was upon him to prove them under his plea of justification, so tbat he was not entitled to such particulars from the plaintiff.

Sir Charles Rcssell (with Mr. A. T. Laurence) appeared on behalf of Mr. Bryce, and contended that he was entitled to such particulars, a it was impossible to find out from the statement of claim what parts ot the paasages extracted from the book wero really intended to lie disputed, aa otherwise the scope of the evidence would be enormous.

Waa it intended seriously to put the defendant to prove that there was a King in New York in 1870, aid that great frauds occurred Mr. Lawsox Walton, Q.C., on tbe part of the plaintiff, urged that if the defendant really required any such information in order to limit his proof he could give notice to the plaintiff to admit certain matters, or might administer interrogatories to the plaintiff in support of such statement a were supposed not to be really in dispute. But tbe order in question unduly restricted the plaintiff, as it required particulars as to what be meant to regard as untrue," especially as the libel Ions passages were in italics. The Cocrt came to tho conclusion that the order, slightly modified in it term, wa right, and must be upheld. Mr.

Barox IIctdlistox aaid it. was a long statement of claim, which set forth a great number of matters of fact, some of which might require proof, while others hardly could require it. And if the issue stood as it did, it would throw an immense burden of proof on the defendant aa' to many matters not really in controversy whereas if the plaintiff were called upon to give particulars of the matters on which he relied, the scope of tho proof would be limited to what was really material. The words of the order as it stood were indeed too stringent, as they required par' ticulars from the plaintiff of the matters he alleged to be untrue, and tnat ougbt to be altered urns Matters on which be intends to rely and thus amended the order ought to stand. Mr.

Jcstick Grantham was of the tame opinion, observing that it wa a question certainly of some difficulty, but be thought that tbe difficulty would be met tu the way suggested. It was a very long statement of claim, comprising a large portion, of' tho chapter complained of, and even the passages printed in italics included many matters which could hardly be disputed and were certainly in themselves not libellous, and it was difficult to see how these part could be really relied upon as either libellous or untrue as, for instance, that a certain board waa appointed, and that the board met. Sorely it could not be suggested that these statements were libellous or could Le disputed a untrue and so as to other passages. Tbat being so, it was not indicated to the defendant what matters were really in dispute, and it could not be indicated except by the particulars which were ordered, and which, therefore, he thought ought to be ordered in tba terms suggested. (Btforc Mr.

Jcsticx Vauguax Williams and Mb. Jcsticx Lawrancx.) sooth y. coctflowxr. This case occupied tbe attention of the Court all Saturday and also to day. It was an action to set aside certain conveyances of chief rents made by tbe plaintiff, who was a builder, to tbe defendant, a solicitor, and a member of the firm of Withington, Petty, and Bontflower.

The. defendant had acted a tbe plaintiff's legal adviser, and, it was alleged, in consequence of his position, induced the plaintiff to make the conveyance to him. Tbe Official Referee, Mr. Hemming, Q.C., having bad the case referred to him, found in favour of the plaintiff, and ordered the plaintiff to account for the profita made on the re sale of tbe chief rents. The defendant now sought to set this Hading aside on tbe usual grounds and applied for a new trial.

Mr. Ambrose, Q.C. (with him Mr. Tindal Atkinson), appeared in support of the application for a new trial Mr. Clare (with blm Farwcll), appeared for the plaintiff.

After argument, the question as to tho liability under the surety deed having been settled, Mr. Jcsticx Vacghan Williams "delivered tbe jalrraent of tbe Court on tbe other questions as follows In my opinion the learned referee was right, and we cannot reverse his judgment. On Saturday in the course of tho argument I thought it right to put many questiotu bet, having since then looked up the authorities I thought it right to ask for further assistance to day from counsel. When tbe matter came before tbe referee bo rightly held tbat tbe onui was on the solicitor to show the transaction was a fair one. Evidence was given on behalf of the solicitor as the price being a proj er one.

He speaks himself to the price being lair, and says he was. originally to raise money by mortgage on these rents, but could not do so. Coder the.se circumstances he gare 1,500 for the chief rents and be callt a valuer cf large experience in Manchester, who says that price wai a full price. Unfortunately his evidence goes too far, for the valuer practically says that third chief rent are worth nothing, and if 5u0 had been given instead of 11.500 be would have considered that a full' price. If I had this question of price only before me, I should have thought the 1,500 was a good and sulcient price, and I tliink Mr.

Bontflower really thought the price a proper one. In Savery v. King (5 If. L. C27), where a solicitor bought from his client, the Court refused to uphold the sale, although they said there was no reflection on tbe solicitor, because the solicitor had not dealt at arm's length.

The tale cannot be upheld here, although we do not reflect at all on Mr. Bout flower. I do not think the onus is satisfied merely because the solicitor 'shows the price was sufficient. I. think he must also show that he has dealt at arm's length, and that any influence or presumption that the client might be influenced by tbe relationship waa removed.

Mr. Bontflower acted as the solicitor in the very matter, and although be seems to have attempted to divest himself pro Kac vice of tbe relationship of legal adviser, still be acted afterward in the same transaction as Mr. Booth' solicitor, as he bad done before. He waa indeed ao much his adviser and solicitor that, though tba bargain waa for one lump ram, whleh wa ta be paid itsaediataljs yet fee IB mZZXL 4 poxenaatnontry ftaad over T' In. although the, wa no pro wit 2.1.1 JR.1?.

i.il ii "Biseii jnatined tn paying in M' BootV account with tba firm of which thai ael r.V ba ha tatw ol aOat aoCOUnt waa. If In feet U. I i. i si, uwwi waa urcruiawu, ta. Wiof tha money would har Hi' BxUireoulcI Dot bar comntand of thU to fa a tbe Arm cbos.

It seems Mr. It himself fo Ue teem to bare tboaibt ha could only rt it ia this manner aad fo thit torpce. a eoac)oiion I have com to la that lam not satisfied that Mr. Bontflower had at tbe time of naoH 01 his character aa solicitor, and In these circumstance I see no round lor lending it to the Offleial Referee again. jcsticx Lawraxcx.

I am of th a upmion. ine Official llefrree waa perfectly justified 7, conclusion co aiu. mere 1 nc reflection on thn rli.nei., ir. etBj in a dooble capacity of banker and olicitor, and while tbe solicitor's anna were stretched oat a far as they oaght to have been, vet the tanker' 7 c'ocr uu it ougut to nave been. JudgmentVaccordingly, with cost.

Btfort Mr. Jcsticx Day and a Sixeial Jura.) At tbe sitting of the Court, one of the jurymen, who had taken hi. I lai alio jury iroa, run una Bald wished! to call bu Lordship' attention to the fact that a number of other jurors whose names had teen called out bad not answered. Mr. Justice Day, alter con altlB2 With the a.nci.te.

a.M ho aa for three days seven jurors bad failed to aoswer whea towir names were called, lit burden of service most fairly by all. These who did not attend would have to take tha consequences of disobedience to the order of the Court, and, by way of preventing Similar inconvenience to thn eentlemen at, .11.1 discharge their duties, however irksome, be would fine those gentlemen who had not' answered to their name aiu eacn. WARRICK Y. LONDON ASD INDIA DOC C3 J0IXT COM MITTIX. Tbil Wa an action bronrlit tn rarnrae rl.m....

fn. personal injuries, sustained owing to tbe alleged negligence of the defendants' servant. The fact were snorny as follows On July 28. 189. the latnttff wa employed on board the steamship Port lenifon, wbirh wa unloading in the South West India Dock.

Tbe steamer wa loaded with a cargo of agar, which was paciea in tiamooo basket. These basketa were raised from the bald hr meant nf a rnna to which waa attached a ehain with two books, eaeh nook Having two prongs. The prongs were fastened into the bamboo basket work, and tbe basketa were then hoisted up to a height of 14ft. above the deck. The crane was then twang round, and tba basket iu uio quay, me piainiiix was at work cutting away some wash deek nines in the rullr war.

wben one of the wa being swung'round, fell from the hooks, and injured him. The damagea were agreed to be 350 in the event of the defendant! being neid liable. Tbe defence was that the plaintiff was not lawfully on the spot that the accident wa inevitable and not caused by any negligence; that tbe tackle waa the usual and armroved arrolianee for iiuiug wura mat toe piaintiu was muy aware oi tea risa oi accident Irom tna baskets and tackle. and voluntarily incurred the same, and by exercising reasonaoie care migni nave avoided me accident. Ine evidence for the plaintiff showed that the basketa wero made of such a material that the hooka were liable to tear awav that one of the hooka was detached wben the basket which cawed the accident had been hoisted from the hold, and that it was even after that swung round that shortly before the accident a basket bad fallen from the books into tbe hold that no proper warning ha1 been given and also that unloading dv means oi nooks waa a dangeroua metnod, and alines should have been used.

On the other hand. for the defence dock labourers engaged in unloading mo snip were caiiea to prove tnat tne piaintiu Had received proper warning not to work under tbe swing oi un crane teat tue meicoa oi unloading wa tee safest and most usual. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, and judg ment waa given lor ajou, tne sum agreed upon. Mr, Dickens and Mr. Cranstoun appeared for tbe plaintiff Mr.

Kemp, Q.C, and Mr. George Wallace lor tne oeirnaants. XDXX Y. THX XXWSrAFXB FCRLISHIXO COMFAXT AVD AXOTHXR. Tbia wa an action for libel.

The libel complained of wa published in the Sfor of November 6, 1889, and ran a louowa An uuieer A ills iiimsell in a Cab A cistol shot wa beard in Pall mall vetterdav after noon. It came from a hansom cab opposite Marlborough House. Looking into the cab the driver taw that hit I are, a gentleman who Had ordered him to drive to the Grtwvenor Hotel, bad shot himself and was dead. On the body being searched a card was found bearing the name Morton Eden, Irincess of Wales's Yorkshire Regiment. There wa also a case bearing the words Scots Guard, but the police believe the unhappy man is laieutenant aicnon taen, oi toe xorkanire Regiment, which is now stationed at Portsmouth, and which recently returned from foreign service." Mr.

Morton Eden, the gentleman who committed suicide in a cab yesterday, waa tho brother of Sir William Eden, of West Auckland, County Durham. He was at one time of his life well known in clubland, and a successful pigeon shooter at Ranelagh Club, but bad run through bis fortune." On November 12 the following apology appeared in the Star Another Mr. Morton Eden. Messrs. Perkins and Sawyer, of 23, Laurence Pountney lane.

solicitor for Mr. Morton Eden, brother of Sir William Eden, informs this morning that their client is not tbe Mr. Morton Eden who committed suicide in a cab, alluded to in our paragraphs of the 6th and 7th iust. We therefore wholly withdraw the two above paragraphs, and express regret that we should have been misled in tbe matter, and ao caused Mr. Morton Eden any annovanee." The above was also inserted in the Star of November IS.

The defence was that the libel was published without malice and without gross negligence that tbey had apologised aad, further, they paid 40s. into court, rhich, they aaid, wa (ulSeient to satisfy the plaintiff's claim. After Mr. Ccck had opened the plaintiff's ease and tbe plaintiff bad riven formal evidence, counsel con sulted together, and Mr, Cock said he waa glad to aay he wa able to put an end to the matter. It was cot matter oat oi wnicn tne piaintiu wiacea to make money.

He felt greatly annoyed at tbe libel, and ao brought his action. He therefore accepted the defendant offer of ten guineas in addition to the 40s. paid into court. Mr. Ahqcith, Q.C, expressed regret on behalf of the defendants.

Judgment was accordingly entered for the plaintiff icr the amount agreed upon. Mr. Cock, Q.C, and Mr. Finninger appeared for tbe plaintiff Mr. Asquitb, Q.C, and Mr.

Blake Odgers for the defendants. Btfort Mb. Jcsticx A. L. Smith and a Special Jury.) XELSOX V.

WILSON. Tbe defendant in this action 'were the well known firm of shipowners tbe plaintiff was a in one of their steamers in May last on a voyage from Christiania to London. Tbe action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by tbe plaintiff in consequence of a collision which occurred during the voyage. Mr. Bigham, Q.C, and Mr.

3erutton were counsel for tbe plaintiff Mr. Barnes, Q.C, and Mr. J. G. Witt appeared for tbe defendant.

Mr. Bigham opened the plaintiff' ease, from which it appeared tbat Mr. Nelson, who waa a shipping butcher, bad occasion to go to Norway, and accordingly embarked with bis wife on board tbe Panther for Christiania. He did not take a ticket, but while on bo.rd paid 8, tbe price of aecond clai return fares for himself and bis wife. He returned to England on board the Angelo.

and did not take a ticket, but aimply abowed the receipt for the return fares paid onboard the Panther. While in a fog during the passage to England the Angelo came into collision with the Dutch fishing smack Onderneiming, which was at anchor on one of tho fishing banks in tbe North Sea. Tbe plaintiff, who was standing in tbe well deek of tbe steamer, was struck on the head and became intensible, and sustained very serious injuries. Tbe plaintiff was called and corroborated his learned counsel's opening. He was cross examined by Mr.

Rarnxs with a view of showing that be bad desired the steward of the Panther to have his tickets forwarded to hit address at Holms trad, and tbat be bad received the tickets, which contained a condition that the defendant would not be responsible for (infer afia) personal injuries from any act, neglect, or default of the master, mariners, or other ssrvants of the owners." lie also denied that be was standing on the first class passengers' side of the ship when, the accident occurred. The plaintiff's doctors were called and deposed that he suffered from a very severe concussion of the brain, which bad affected bit memory and bad made bim unfit for business. With reference to the collision the evidence of tbe crew of the Dutch smack (which bad been taken on commission) was read, which was to the effect that while at anchor in a fog they heard the whistle of a steamer. They rang their fog bell, but the steamer, which proved to be the Angelo, ran into them, carrying away their bowsprit and cutting their cable. Messrs.

Wilson bad denied all liability for the accident, but on its being represented to them that the fishermen were very poor persons, and would have to make good the damage themselves, tbey gave them 25 toward it. Other evidence which had been taken on commission in Norway was read to the effect tbat no letter bad been delivered at Holms trad for the plaintiff during hi stay there. In opening the defendants' ease Mr. WITT regretted tbat an attempt had been made to construe Messrs. Wilson's generosity to tbe smaeksmen into an admission of that liability tbey bad denied all through.

With regard to the tickets he would prove that they were sent from the office of Messrs. Wilson's agent at Christiania and subsequently given up by the plaintiff to the steward of the Angelo. With regard to the accident he should prove that the plaintiff was on tbe part of. the ship appropriated to first class passengers whea it happened, and if he had remained on the aecond elasa side be would have escaped injury. With regard to the first part of the defendants' case the captain and steward of the Panther were called, and some evidence which bad been takea on commission as to the issue of the tickets from the office of Messrs.

Wilson' agent at Cbri tiania was read, which supported Mr. Witt' opening, and the stewards of the Angelo were called to prove tbat the tickets which were produced ia Court bad ba circa up by tha plaintiff oa board th Angalo As to tha eeDItfoa Captain Jchnson ff tba Angelo) wa called, and ba said that a tba weather tp 7 were going at tail spaed. Suddenly a aim light was Men nearly ahead. Tba engine war reverted aad the helm pat hard a port. Tbey did not strike tba smack, bat ber bownrit came through thai rail on tbe port side just beore tbe break of tba poop and carried away the itanebion.

Tb plaintiff Jr ne.oia bos see now is nappes ea. Mr. Bigham cross examined this witness to show tbat tbe accident could have bees avoided if tha steamer bad been going slower. Tb bearing of tbia ease, which bad occupied tbe whole of Saturday and to day, was not concluded when the Court rote. Btfort Mr.

Jcsticx Charles ad a Ceemo ry.) XIXO AND WIFE Y. HIXTOX' AXD CO. This was an action by a decorator and hi wife a gain it a firm of dairymen at Croydon to recover damage for personal injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of one of their driver on March 30 of last year. Mr. B.

F. Williams. Q.C, and Mr. Edwyn Jcnet were for the plaintiffs Mr. G.

M. Cohen for the defendants. Tbe short fact of the case as opened by counsel were a follow March 30. 189, plaintiff was driving with hi wife ia a dog cart in the Church road, Croydoo. He wa proceeding from tbe direction of Southend towards Pitlake at a moderate pace, when just at tbe point where tbe Palace road eroeses Church road a milk eart telontrin? to tbe defendants.

and driven by one of tbeir drivers, a man named Durion, came into collision with bit trap. Ibe off shaft of the milkacart interlocked with' plaintiff' off tioe intti, ana tne result was mat plaints and His wife were thrown out of their trap and injured. The plaintiff's injuries did not confine him to the bouse for tad been ml nod, and bad stated ttket tlwy kaaw abw olutely aothing about tba tnontry exeep what tee bankrupt bad stated. Aa aStUtft had bj Batk to tba bBsbandof Mrs. ITiotna, whleh stewed teat sha could not poewibly bavs got, tocattarMeh a sum of mooey, while the bad never abowa any particular affect ion for Catherine Thomas, and.

a a matter of fact. Hose Ada Tboma, tbe other alleged etwfliary, waa act bora until four aaontba after br fandsiotbtr death. Tbe alleged cestui on Inutcaf were not repreented by counsel, bat it waa stated that their conduct bad been perfectly honest throng boats and ttat a tbey bad been put to certain expense ia consequence of tba proceeding tba trustee was desiroua, if tiermissioa waa given by tbe Court, to recoup then for tba cost so incurred out of tba estate. Mr. Jcsticx Cayx said that the application of the trustee must be allowed.

Ine Court would make aa order in the tent cf tbe notice of motion and permission would be given to the trustee to allow tba cost of tbe Tboma family which bad been properly incurred. ADMIRALTY DIVISION. Btfort Mr. Jcsticx Butt.) d'xtchcotxx D'XTcncbrxx. Sarah B.

d'Etehroven. whose maiden him Stoke, petitioned for tbe disiolution of her marriage J' stwoati oi mi oirxmT and adultery. There waa no defence. Mr. Middletco appeared for tbe petitioner.

In opentng the case counsel for tbe petitioner stated tbat the marriage of tbe partie wa celebrated aa Compton, in tbe province of Quebec, ia 1878. He was a farmer, and fcr some years tbey lived on a farm ia Canada, and there were two children of tba marriage. In 1882 tbe petitioner aad tbe respondent came to this country, where the rettondent father, a r.atnr.li.a Englishman, then resided. After a cohabitation at itlctmood and in Mr. Etchgoyen left bit wile.

Tbi. was in 1885. In 1887 be Sled a petition id this Court for the dissolution of tbe marriaea em tbe ground of his wife' adultery with ber brother in law. On that retiticn tbe Question of iurisdietion wa raised, the wifo pleading that ber husband wa a Canadian and hi domicile wa not in England. The question was argued before the President, aod on the sth of May, 1888.

bit lords hi rronoencal for an Eag.ish domicile, and directed that the suit should proceed. The husband did cot. however, proceed with it, but in July of tbe tame year took out a summons for its dismissal. An order was made directing tba dismissal of tbefsuit on payment of costs, but a these bad not been pafit tbe suit was not dismissed. It now appeared tbat in June, 1883, Mr.

'Etchgoyen obtained what might truly be described a a fraudulent divorce at Chicago, in the United State, on tha ground tha his wife bad deserted him and on the 10th of July, 1833, be. wens through a form of marriage at Vermont, in tbe United States, with a woman named Kate O'Leary. Thi wa tbe bigamy charged, and the adultery alleged in tbe petition waa the subsequent cohabitation with that woman. Tha divorce obtained by tbe respondent at Chicago wa totally invalid in thi country, the President having; decided that the domicile of Mr. dTtchgojen was aa.

English one. Mr. Jcsticx Butt observed that learned counsel bad done quite right ia mentioning tbe Chicago divorce, but tbe Court bad no judicial cognizance of it. It was no part of tbe) cae of the petitioner in tbe present suit, and tbe respondent bad cot pleaded it as an answer to the petition. In these circumstances perhaps the less Mr.

Middleton said about it tba better, tecacse, even though it might not be valid this country, the question might" arise whether a wuti who bad been divorced by tbe laws of a country could be held guilty of bigamy in contractinrr a marriage is that same country after tbe divorce. The Court would act in thi case without reference to any dissolution of marriage having been pronounced. Mr. d'Etcbgoyen was examined, and laid tbat bet? husband deserted ber in 1885. There wa not tbe (lightest ground for the charge made against ber la 1887 by ber husband of adultery with ber brother inlaw.inlaw.

nriucmt waa men given oi tne respondent a I jfaarriage with Kate O'Leary in July, 1888, and of mcir uoequoat conaDitaiion. Mr. Jcsticx Bctt said tbat tbe evidence of Mrs. d'Etcbgoyen went to show desertion, which, with tba adultery, would have entitled ber to a dissolution of tbe marriage but a she bad not pleaded desertion the Court could not take it into account. There would be a decree nut on the ground of bigamy and adultery.

COUNTY OF LONDON SESSIONS. The April adjourned Quarter Session were opened to day at tbe Sessicna house. Clerkenweil, before Sir P. H. Edlin, Q.C, ebajLrman, Mr.

TVarry, Q.C, and other Justices. Tbe calendar contains tbe names, of 52 persons for trial. Before Sir P. H. Edlix, Q.C) Jamxs Fiticirald, 33, pleaded Guilty to a charge of larceny.

Mr. Keith Frith, for tbe prosecu tion, aaid the prosecutor bad been robbed of bis watch and chain by the prisoner in Commercial road, at 11 15 p.m. on April 15. A number of previous convictions Tor similar offenees were proved against the pritoner, and ba waa sentenced to live year penal servitude. Edwux Sharp, 60, and Jamxs Nicholls, AO, labourers, were indicted for having stolen a quantity of lead piping, fixed to a building.

Mr. Furcell waa for the prosecution. Mr. Bunch, house agent, deposed that oa April 17, baring received certain informations he went to an empty house in Graham road, Hackney, which was under his care, and there fannd thai iwl. toners in the conservatorr at the back et tha hansa.

Tbey had cut away a quantity of lead piping, aad Mr. Bunch aent for a constable and gave them into custody. They were found QtUti. and were sentenced to four months' imprisonment, with bard labour. Thomas Willi ax Hortxxxr.

37, was houghs trpi for sentence as aa 'incorrigible rogue, baring been, convicted by Mr. Cooke. pcJice maris trata, of neg lecting to maintain hi wife, whereby tbe became; chargeable to tbe parish of Fsddington. Evidence, was given tnat ue was aoie to earn good wages in a newsagent' office at which he bad been employed. Ha had been twice sent to prison for neglecting to main; tain hi wife and children, and wa now (enteneed toi six months' imprisonment, with bard labour.

Tnz Sprixo Circuits or thr Jcdaxs. At ft. meeting of the Judges of the Queen's Bench v.tt at Law Courts yesterday afternoon, the fol .1. vj i a Assixes, which are expecieI to begin in tbe earlrj part of May Northern Circuit (Manchester and) Liverpool only), Mr. Baron Huddleston and Mr.

Justice Lswranee North Eaatern Circuit (Leed only), Mr. Justice Penman and Mr. Justice Both civil aad criminal business wiU ba taken av more than a fortnight, but Mrs. King's injuries were of a much more seriou character. Eryiipela let in.

consequent on the injuries to ber head, and this again affected the right eye. and canted inflammation in the lachrymal canal, which produced fistula. In June she waa unsuccessfully operated tn tbe (till suffers from lachrymal fistula, and it i likely to be permanent. Evidence was called to prove tbat plaintiff was on bis near side, and that defendants cart was on its off side going at an improper pace. Dr.

Neligan proved the nature of the injuries sustained, and witnesses were called who witnessed the accident. For the defence evidence was called to trove that plaintiff was going at from 10 to 12 miles an hour on bis wrong side, while defendants' cart was merely at a trot, not more than three miles an hour. It was further alleged tbat, as plaintiff was clearing the defendants' cart, be struck the defendant' horse with bis elbow or nst, and tnat tnat act, by causing the horse to swerve, caused defendants' abaft to catch in plaintiff wheel. counsel on either tide tsvlnr addressed the tnrr. Mr.

Justice Charles summed un. and cointedout to the jury tbat the plaintiff must not cnly make out defendants' negligence, but also that he hinuelf was in no way to blame in the matter. Unless plaintiff made out these two points, he could not succeed. Tbe mere fact of a man driving on bis off side was not in itself a wronzful act. and unless it were made out that such driving directly contributed to the accident, it ought not to be taken as against the defendant.

His Lordship then proceeded to review and comment on ue evidence caned on eitner side. Tbe iurT retired at 3 o'cloek to consider their ver dict, and returned at 3 40 with a verdict for plain sins uamages, aiuu. tils Lordnnip being at a Judges meeting, judgment as postponed until to morrow morning. Btfort Mr. Jcsticx Cayx tnttotit a Jury.) ac era V.

D05CASTXR CXIOX RURAL SAX XT ART AUTHORITT. This ease originally came on for trial before lit, Justice Care at tbe Leeds Assixes but, an important witness ocing too in so attend, it was aojoumea oy consent of both parties to London, and waa heard on Tuesday and Wednesday last. Mr. Tindal Atkinsjn. U.C.

and Mr. Rowland Wil kinson appeared for the plaintiff Mr. Lock wood. t.tj., and sir. itorton 'witn tnem sir.

Lawson naltoiij Q.C)' lor tne deleixiants. It appeared that tbe plaintiff, in making tome add! tions and alterations to bis dwellingnouse, situated in lientiey road, near Donraster, tad neglected to com plv with the requirements of certain eve laws of the sanitary authority, whereupon the authority, acting under tne power conierrea upon tnem, demolished a part of th premise. In thi action the plaintiff claimed an injunction restraining the defendants from a repetition ot the acts complained of, together with l.ouu damages lor lniury to nis property, live law 55 provided that 15 square feet air space should be left open in the rear of any new building and it was 'not denied by the plaintiff tbat be cad failed to observe this, but he contended that be bad entered into a binding agreement to purchase the ground on wnicn the new part stood sufficient to satisfy the statute, and that therefore this bye law did not apply to his case. Bat, even assuming that it did, the defendants exceeded it by demolishing beyond the 15 square feet, and were therefore liable tor excess of damage. It was proved that the premises were unroofed beyond the proper limit, that the dibrit fell in, and that that part of the premises was left uncovered all nieht.

The defendants admitted tbat tbe 15 square feet were exceeded, but contended that it was only to a necessary ana inappreciable extent, though it waa proved that a man was enmloved for 14 hours in retiling the roof. They further alleged that specific instructions were given to tbe contractor not to exceed the 15ft. limit, and that if the Board's authority was exceeded the Board waa not responsible, this being a ease of trespass. At an earlier stare of the proceeding the Board bad summoned the plaintiff before tbe magistrates for not submitting a plan of tbe proposed alteration in accordance with another bye law, wben be was Sned Mr. Justice Cayx.

in eivinz Judgment, said. Tbe plaintiff contended that the proceedings of the defend ants were wholly wrong, inasmuen as ne cad entered into a covenant with the owner of tbe adioining land for its purchase I think there never waa any agreement between Jagger and the adjoining owner. There were negotiations, no doubt, but tbey never resulted in an aereement. verbal or in writing, and ao tbe de fendants were justified in pulling down such part of tbe building a were not in conformity with the bye law. On the question whether there waa an excess of damage no doubt the persona employed did go beyond the part of the land which did not belong to the plaintiff, and as to that excess there was a default.

But. tbe defendants, besides employing a con tractor, in addition aireceu a servant oi tneir own to assist in tbe demolition, and I do not find ch ei'r cumstanees as to make Lim a servant of tbe contrac tors. The sanitary autLoil? would, therefore, le liable ievvtly 'with the contractor, it must be admitted tnat where a servant acts in the honest belief that he is carrying out hia master's orders, and not acting for reasons of bis own, the master is liable. And that is the present ease. There is no suggestion that the servant thought be was going teyond his instructionsprobably they were not sufficiently definite.

Doubtless tbe parties engaged in unroofing tbe part abutting on Jigger's own land thought tbey were doing tbeir duty, and so tbe sanitary authority is liable. What is tbe extent of their liability I am satisfied tbat on the part abutting on plaintiff's own land there was no excess. Tbe evidence in regard to that' and the back wa strikingly different. As to the portion standing on the plaintiff' own land I have no doubt tbat a conaiderable part ot tbe slates was stripped Accident lB.anaeeUow.peny. pan beard ftU Interlocutory layoff, and for this the delendants would be liable.

What Ilostme Smetnwirk Dietrict Local Board of hh i is the extent of their liability I am satisfied that FMdJ VaUfr. TJmmm Company (bi Final Lui Thorn the sanitary authority eould not have pulled down that irft jmti? part without pulling down the whole, inelndine the I ArntaL Cocar IL Before Lran carrier Lnrptxr aod! slates, and on that ground tbey are not liable. Jagger I8.30 1,1 1 ii i terloeatorjr Li tl. Yatiale and Co. Lawee, part bmrd Frrwd had persisteoUy disregarded tbe bye laws.

He built, lM nv Furujlurif anal risimrmComtrnhj ttrowa (ia. knowing nc nad no ngnt. lie was given an oppor Lunacy Matter and Oi inoai leterlocntory Appeal win bm takea ia tnnitv of rithee rrmirin. l.rvi t1i hrir r.r Court IL tomorrow (Wednetdail. Cbaaoan Final Asceai no aniWeTanli in aav'a.

luSZT or jrsnciL CHAXCXr.T DITTS. and so the sanitary authority were right in aaying that ccmv Cocar liL Krfor. m. Jpsrica earrrr. at 10 tbey had a right to pull down the part in excess, Adjourned Summons.

IM1 Hod on lea potto Ioderwwkl. par even if the whole should fall, and to do it in the most beard. Further ttmamleratlooa, Markwell v. Mcotb Asbton V. convenient wav tn tbrmselves Tr ev not allowed I Matthews; and Hor Joanaoa.

Cauara for TrlaL without wtto W1" cemseive. Ay are not aiiowea wa Shanilin Ft Company ttx parte W. Austin to do it in a dangerous wsy, but consistently with Kaikwv. Kaik mi pan IT ttff Lramst a IidJey Li, safety may effect their object in tbe way ttey please, trict lnkms Company v. Tyrrell (s pau Llrd Daok ot Biimine On another rround the defendant are not liable; for.

5.CT "i iuny, tMoitort tt assuming they were not justified in removing the tiles, cSuuSi wi FieiSei' yet no damage has been proved. The damage would gam v. name lea part Load ,1.. I Croakeflv. Ioedtir.

1 1 LHUCTST UICSI LL UTOI1 aB al L.B1 11 HTW at lij Adjourned ffoanious. Re Tb Victory (Limited! and Coar tnies Aeuvpart baarrt. k'urtber Consideiatscca. Eale par beard Laae Lane Wilkinson v. Alcock Fayn Fayaw Bed lord v.

Drtteford. Petition, Htrvwoa v. Haurijoo, Loan UHaxc SLLoa Cocar. Before Ma. Jrrrtce 8rrnxcra, at 13 30 Farther Cocikleration.

Baylia Uanaoa (3) Taylor v. 5ollier Tbcaptoa v. Smith aad Wolf. Adjourned Srunmoote and Can, for Tttii. without wttne sea A M.

Wood' Shies' Weodito protection Company and Companiea At Young v. iJarrta, Cnaacxax totrav IV. Before Mjl Jtmcx kiu.lm, at 1030 aojimioos, with witneeaea. Re Liverpool Hoeteheld Stent, rtrtbetwd. QUXEXS BENCH D1TI3.OTS.

Loan Carrr cm ex's Cocax. Divisional ContT. Eafnr Ike leu Ctiir Jrmct ot mlud ud Va JcitkiMitiiw, at la 31 Ex pane Mottone ew toe (Jr. wo Side. Crowa paper.

Mayor, he. of udder Held e. Seaw. part beard lyeasola Ktfbure Jone e. Aberdeen, ave ttooauneata! Company tiriSths rotter and Co.

v. Hacnak Hall e. Fmallpiic tdaekbara v. Yoalc and another Tonbnds Local Roard v. Jones 111 OCormts bweet and other Die and eon Leouon Const Cowneil tjrix Exacw Cormr VL Drvtsioaat.

Cocar. Before Mr. Je ticx YatroBAw WiixxAWs and Ma. JcsTies La waiver, tt 1030 kt pan Motions ea tb CiwlSeda. lyppoted Meueeca tb Civil bide.

Claik Sovmenacbeta. part beard Re Uoprrutha Acts, tl part Bonner end aken Deek e.tirma bi 4 Co. Ure.o v. Lawrence Ue a hVda eor. el rsuto ie orporated Law SorJeiy Hurnr xe v.

Snyder Palmer Tata Crowtbar v. Taraer aa ArbHratme reteeea Ward tad Can HfoairTlt Bteardta CXI tcxE' Burets Cocar YIL e)rm nr SiSttcrTtTv Defor Ms. JcaTica Cava, at 13 30 FickL part Prat v. Tboma and Mberl, pari beard He Same, part e. Lewi and 4ber.

put bears Re RMtway, pan Robtawa aad Father be FliadeiUex parte laard RjcbarO Re Brytat. parte mart Looa. ex parte ebenffof Sawrey a Geaea, part Wuliaw, v. Hastock part fceap Jone Doael .1 part OceU v. Harper 1X1 Wrroti iw BAsaarrrvr.

Dtvtsiosax. Cacar. Ms. Jrsrrca Cava aad Ms. Jcnita Lawaascz C1 ait bear appeals from Caveat Court, uaa nee Wadseedayt, at 1930.

tjrisjr. Best Cocar IIL Setor Ma. Jtvllt Dtthaw tt 10 30 MioMlr el Actiraa. Utiawl dartre. Dew e.

TraA a aad 14 etb Westcfa Railway Coapaa Iks e. Rural SaautarT Aathwritw these place. LAW NOTICES, This Day (Tuesday), April 22. noCSI OFL0HD3. Wisvam yaa At 10 IS Carae.

tw i ranc v. Lord Kerrey tad other, (oooeideraaionl Hrurhee Merter Dock aad harbour Board Uarther betnngl Be Ipavrpsr) v. Befg. and Be (pauper) v. Bc red actio liaise.

8UTRXME COURT OF JUD I CATCRI COURT or APPEAL. ArriAi. Cocar Before tb Uiim of th Solas, tad Louts carters Far and Lore, at 10 Appeals frost tb Qoeea'a and as to any damage caused Ly rain tbe evidence was insufficient. On tbe whole there would be judg ment fcr the defendants. (Siffitt; in Bauirupttj Wore Mr.

JCSTICX Cayx.) IX RK RKXD FARTK SALAMAX. The eircumstsoee of this case were very singular, bankruptcy petition was. in Septemler last pre sented against tbe bankrupt. John Reed, tut be failed to attend his pnblie examinatioi and a warrant of arrest waa issued against him. The bankrupt then stated that be bad no property, and an.

extraordinary ry was told by mm to toe ezect teat about tee year rl a Mrs. Tbomaa. who resided at Exeter, came on to London and placed in hia hands bank notes and gold amounting to 4,500 with directions to apply tbe money for the benefit of ber grandchildren or any of them according to his discretion. Shortly afterwards Mn. Thomas died, and there were no documents of any kind in existence with reference to tbe transaction.

Tbe bankrupt alleged that be bad invested the money in nouses ana otner property, ana tnat ce naa executed several deeds of declaration of trust in favour of Catherine and Rose Ada Ttomn, two of the grandchildren, and that all the property be cad belonged to tbem. On the adjudication Ue Court ordered tbe ankrunt to file a list of all the documents connected with the property ot which be aUeged that he wa trustee, (bowing the securities in which the money was invested. He tailed to comply with this order, bow. ever, or to sppear for bis public examination, a warrant be ins issued for bis arrest and on November 19 last be was brought up from prison for examination, but then refused to state where certain money was which he admitted to be in his poseession or to give any information to tbe Court, aad the Registrar thereupon declined to proceed farther with the examination and directed the bankrupt to be taken neiore Jir. Justice Cave; who, on the further refusal of the bankrupt to answer any questions, committed bim to priscn for six months unless be sooner purged bis contempt and submitted to be examined.

Application was now made by tbe trustee in tbe bankruptcy for a declaration that be was entitled to certain property mentioned in the notice of motion which the bankrupt alleged to be held by him in trust, it being alleged tbat inquiries which had been instituted showed that th whole conduct of the bankrupt wa an impudent fraud and that there wa ao trust at all. Mr. HXRBXRT Rxxd appeared for the trustee, aad stated that the whole story of tbe allerred trad was a fabrication. Both Catherine Tboaas and her father, ol PMleitafe tTaaa (fcatura BTaica rKSL Cotraa Befor Ma. Baaow Htmnxcrroyr.

UVKhMt Bates OotTBT lXrShefera Ma. Jrrrrtfw n.w 13 30 Loadea Artirat, npecial erica. Gordon e. Cardiff aa4 Newcastle Coal Coaeaa Fhallip Laadoa aat ladia Joan Docks Marks Twv FUnuabia, Ac Ctepaar LS271 V' YIIL tiefar MX jerries A. I gaunt 10 20 Leodo Aeuocs.

Special Janet. Means v. WUaoa aad souther, pert heard ea potit v. Xotwood Trotttr lsaaetoa aad ii Vrttura Bases CmraT Y. Before Mm.

Jrrrrrw wrvrv. aa 13 30 MildlMs Aeuoaa. JariaH Aw Le im Yerte. atoch. tad lUberteoa a.

Jaw4r aUrta v. bSZZ Adas Isaac OitX jr' Fnrtkev Hrannc lOm v. Braaia. iv. Before Ms.

Carre caj Das v. 30: 2UidWa Aetio. i aad others Waito v. Sr.yq aalJ Hum Lock Uxeell V.Jt aw jto mn a sat is cseq.